利用安装在公交车上的自动体外除颤器优化除颤器的部署。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Hongmei Li, Ying Wu, Taibo Luo
{"title":"利用安装在公交车上的自动体外除颤器优化除颤器的部署。","authors":"Hongmei Li, Ying Wu, Taibo Luo","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2024.2393319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Early defibrillation with an automated external defibrillator (AED) can effectively improve the survival rate of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Placing AEDs in public locations can reduce the defibrillation response interval from collapse to defibrillation. Most public AEDs are currently placed in a stationary way (S-AED) with limited coverage area. Bus mounted AED (B-AED) can be delivered directly to the demand point. Although B-AEDs are only available during bus operating hours, they provide greater coverage area. When the number of available AEDs is insufficient, better coverage may be achieved by placing a portion of AEDs as B-AEDs. Our purpose is developing a model to determine the optimal locations of B-AEDs and S-AEDs with a predetermined number of available AEDs. The goal is to maximize the total coverage level of all demand points.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We proposed a joint location model to place B-AEDs and S-AEDs based on the p-median problem (JPMP). Using data from Chang'an District, Xi'an City, China, we determined the optimal AED deployment. The performance of JPMP was compared with several other models. The coverage results of JPMP are analyzed in details, including the quantity assignment, coverage level, and geographical location of B-AEDs and S-AEDs. The impact of the bus departure intervals on coverage was also discussed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The use of B-AEDs results in an average 98.43% increase in the number of covered demand points, and an average 74.05% increase in total coverage level. In optimal AED deployment, B-AEDs coverage follows an inverted U-shaped curve with increasing number of available AEDs. It begins to decrease when all demand points during the operating hours are covered. With a constant number of available AEDs, the total coverage level increases and then decreases as the bus departure interval increases. The larger the number of available AEDs, the smaller the optimal departure interval.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>With a given number of available AEDs, combinational deployment of B-AEDs and S-AEDs significantly improves the coverage level. B-AEDs are recommended when AEDs are insufficient. If more AEDs are available, better coverage can be obtained with reasonable location of S-AEDs and B-AEDs.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing Defibrillator Deployment with Bus-Mounted Automated External Defibrillator.\",\"authors\":\"Hongmei Li, Ying Wu, Taibo Luo\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10903127.2024.2393319\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Early defibrillation with an automated external defibrillator (AED) can effectively improve the survival rate of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Placing AEDs in public locations can reduce the defibrillation response interval from collapse to defibrillation. Most public AEDs are currently placed in a stationary way (S-AED) with limited coverage area. Bus mounted AED (B-AED) can be delivered directly to the demand point. Although B-AEDs are only available during bus operating hours, they provide greater coverage area. When the number of available AEDs is insufficient, better coverage may be achieved by placing a portion of AEDs as B-AEDs. Our purpose is developing a model to determine the optimal locations of B-AEDs and S-AEDs with a predetermined number of available AEDs. The goal is to maximize the total coverage level of all demand points.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We proposed a joint location model to place B-AEDs and S-AEDs based on the p-median problem (JPMP). Using data from Chang'an District, Xi'an City, China, we determined the optimal AED deployment. The performance of JPMP was compared with several other models. The coverage results of JPMP are analyzed in details, including the quantity assignment, coverage level, and geographical location of B-AEDs and S-AEDs. The impact of the bus departure intervals on coverage was also discussed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The use of B-AEDs results in an average 98.43% increase in the number of covered demand points, and an average 74.05% increase in total coverage level. In optimal AED deployment, B-AEDs coverage follows an inverted U-shaped curve with increasing number of available AEDs. It begins to decrease when all demand points during the operating hours are covered. With a constant number of available AEDs, the total coverage level increases and then decreases as the bus departure interval increases. The larger the number of available AEDs, the smaller the optimal departure interval.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>With a given number of available AEDs, combinational deployment of B-AEDs and S-AEDs significantly improves the coverage level. B-AEDs are recommended when AEDs are insufficient. If more AEDs are available, better coverage can be obtained with reasonable location of S-AEDs and B-AEDs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prehospital Emergency Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prehospital Emergency Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2024.2393319\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prehospital Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2024.2393319","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:尽早使用自动体外除颤器(AED)进行除颤可有效提高院外心脏骤停(OHCA)患者的存活率。在公共场所放置自动体外除颤器可以缩短从倒地到除颤的响应时间间隔。目前,大多数公共自动体外除颤器都是固定放置(S-AED),覆盖范围有限。安装在公共汽车上的自动体外除颤器(B-AED)可直接送达需求点。虽然 B 型自动体外除颤器只能在巴士运营时间内使用,但其覆盖范围更大。当可用的自动体外除颤器数量不足时,将部分自动体外除颤器作为 B-AED 放置可实现更好的覆盖。我们的目的是开发一个模型,以确定在可用自动体外除颤器数量预先确定的情况下 B-AED 和 S-AED 的最佳位置。目标是使所有需求点的总覆盖水平最大化:方法:我们提出了一个基于p-中值问题(JPMP)的B-AED和S-AED联合位置模型。利用中国西安市长安区的数据,我们确定了 AED 的最优部署。JPMP 的性能与其他几个模型进行了比较。详细分析了 JPMP 的覆盖结果,包括 B-AED 和 S-AED 的数量分配、覆盖水平和地理位置。此外,还讨论了巴士发车间隔对覆盖范围的影响:使用 B-AED 后,覆盖的需求点数量平均增加了 98.43%,总覆盖水平平均增加了 74.05%。在最佳自动体外除颤器部署中,随着可用自动体外除颤器数量的增加,B-AEDs 的覆盖率呈倒 U 型曲线。当工作时间内的所有需求点都被覆盖时,覆盖率开始下降。在可用自动体外除颤器数量不变的情况下,随着公交车发车间隔的增加,总覆盖水平先增加后减小。可用的自动紧急停机坪数量越多,最佳发车间隔就越小:在可用自动体外除颤器数量给定的情况下,B-AED 和 S-AED 的组合部署可显著提高覆盖水平。当自动体外除颤器数量不足时,建议使用 B-AED 。如果有更多的自动体外除颤器,则可以通过合理安排 S-AED 和 B-AED 的位置来获得更好的覆盖率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimizing Defibrillator Deployment with Bus-Mounted Automated External Defibrillator.

Objectives: Early defibrillation with an automated external defibrillator (AED) can effectively improve the survival rate of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Placing AEDs in public locations can reduce the defibrillation response interval from collapse to defibrillation. Most public AEDs are currently placed in a stationary way (S-AED) with limited coverage area. Bus mounted AED (B-AED) can be delivered directly to the demand point. Although B-AEDs are only available during bus operating hours, they provide greater coverage area. When the number of available AEDs is insufficient, better coverage may be achieved by placing a portion of AEDs as B-AEDs. Our purpose is developing a model to determine the optimal locations of B-AEDs and S-AEDs with a predetermined number of available AEDs. The goal is to maximize the total coverage level of all demand points.

Methods: We proposed a joint location model to place B-AEDs and S-AEDs based on the p-median problem (JPMP). Using data from Chang'an District, Xi'an City, China, we determined the optimal AED deployment. The performance of JPMP was compared with several other models. The coverage results of JPMP are analyzed in details, including the quantity assignment, coverage level, and geographical location of B-AEDs and S-AEDs. The impact of the bus departure intervals on coverage was also discussed.

Results: The use of B-AEDs results in an average 98.43% increase in the number of covered demand points, and an average 74.05% increase in total coverage level. In optimal AED deployment, B-AEDs coverage follows an inverted U-shaped curve with increasing number of available AEDs. It begins to decrease when all demand points during the operating hours are covered. With a constant number of available AEDs, the total coverage level increases and then decreases as the bus departure interval increases. The larger the number of available AEDs, the smaller the optimal departure interval.

Conclusions: With a given number of available AEDs, combinational deployment of B-AEDs and S-AEDs significantly improves the coverage level. B-AEDs are recommended when AEDs are insufficient. If more AEDs are available, better coverage can be obtained with reasonable location of S-AEDs and B-AEDs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Prehospital Emergency Care
Prehospital Emergency Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
137
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Prehospital Emergency Care publishes peer-reviewed information relevant to the practice, educational advancement, and investigation of prehospital emergency care, including the following types of articles: Special Contributions - Original Articles - Education and Practice - Preliminary Reports - Case Conferences - Position Papers - Collective Reviews - Editorials - Letters to the Editor - Media Reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信