个人支持性工作安置(ReISE)用于改善患有持续性疼痛的失业人员的持续重返工作:一项队列随机对照方法的内部试点研究。

IF 1.5 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Pål André Amundsen, Martin Underwood, Kim Burton, Margreth Grotle, Martin Stav Engedahl, Ira Malmberg-Heimonen, Pernille Marie Stähr Irgens, Magnus Højen, Adnan Kisa, Milada Hagen, Thor Einar Holmgard, Amy Martinsen, Jakob Lothe, Sølvi Spilde Monsen, Robert Froud
{"title":"个人支持性工作安置(ReISE)用于改善患有持续性疼痛的失业人员的持续重返工作:一项队列随机对照方法的内部试点研究。","authors":"Pål André Amundsen, Martin Underwood, Kim Burton, Margreth Grotle, Martin Stav Engedahl, Ira Malmberg-Heimonen, Pernille Marie Stähr Irgens, Magnus Højen, Adnan Kisa, Milada Hagen, Thor Einar Holmgard, Amy Martinsen, Jakob Lothe, Sølvi Spilde Monsen, Robert Froud","doi":"10.1186/s40814-024-01538-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Persistent pain is a frequent cause of sick leave and work disability in Norway. A return-to-work intervention featuring supported work placements, developed in the UK, demonstrated feasibility, and a return-to-work rate of 20% within 6 months was observed in the sample. We sought to adapt the intervention for delivery in Norway and to confirm feasibility prior to a full-scale trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this internal pilot, we used a pragmatic cohort randomised controlled approach with national recruitment in Norway. We recruited people who were unemployed (for at least 1 month), having persistent pain (for at least 3 months), aged between 18 and 64, and wanting to return to work. We initially recruited people to an observational cohort study of the impact of being unemployed with persistent pain. After baseline measurement, we randomly sub-sampled participants to whom we offered the intervention, which featured individual case management and support, work-familiarisation sessions, and the offer of a 6-week part-time unpaid work placement. We assessed recruitment rates (aiming to recruit 66, and sub-sample 17 within 6 months); optimal recruitment pathways; intervention acceptance rates; the feasibility of data collection; using video links for work-familiarisation sessions and remote case manager support.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The pilot ran from June to November 2022. Of 168 people expressing interest, 94 consented. Recruitment posts on Facebook yielded the most 'expressions of interest' (66%, n = 111). After screening for eligibility, we included 55 participants. Of these, 19 were randomised to be offered the intervention. Of these, less than half (n = 8) consented to intervention participation. Remote case manager and work-familiarisation sessions appeared feasible. Following a delay in identifying placements, three participants received offers of work placements, with one starting and completing during the pilot period. Data collection methods were feasible, and no adverse events were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Recruitment and logistical processes, such as remote management by video link, are feasible. However, delivery of the intervention is challenging. In particular, sourcing placements and the time required for identifying appropriate placements was more challenging than anticipated. A full-scale trial is feasible but will require improvements to the placement identification processes.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ISRCTN85437524 (Referring to the ReISE trial, of which this internal pilot was a part), Registered 31 of May 2022 https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN85437524 TRIAL FUNDING: Norwegian Research Council.</p>","PeriodicalId":20176,"journal":{"name":"Pilot and Feasibility Studies","volume":"10 1","pages":"110"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11321075/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Individual supported work placements (ReISE) for improving sustained return to work in unemployed people with persistent pain: an internal pilot study of a cohort randomised controlled approach.\",\"authors\":\"Pål André Amundsen, Martin Underwood, Kim Burton, Margreth Grotle, Martin Stav Engedahl, Ira Malmberg-Heimonen, Pernille Marie Stähr Irgens, Magnus Højen, Adnan Kisa, Milada Hagen, Thor Einar Holmgard, Amy Martinsen, Jakob Lothe, Sølvi Spilde Monsen, Robert Froud\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40814-024-01538-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Persistent pain is a frequent cause of sick leave and work disability in Norway. A return-to-work intervention featuring supported work placements, developed in the UK, demonstrated feasibility, and a return-to-work rate of 20% within 6 months was observed in the sample. We sought to adapt the intervention for delivery in Norway and to confirm feasibility prior to a full-scale trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this internal pilot, we used a pragmatic cohort randomised controlled approach with national recruitment in Norway. We recruited people who were unemployed (for at least 1 month), having persistent pain (for at least 3 months), aged between 18 and 64, and wanting to return to work. We initially recruited people to an observational cohort study of the impact of being unemployed with persistent pain. After baseline measurement, we randomly sub-sampled participants to whom we offered the intervention, which featured individual case management and support, work-familiarisation sessions, and the offer of a 6-week part-time unpaid work placement. We assessed recruitment rates (aiming to recruit 66, and sub-sample 17 within 6 months); optimal recruitment pathways; intervention acceptance rates; the feasibility of data collection; using video links for work-familiarisation sessions and remote case manager support.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The pilot ran from June to November 2022. Of 168 people expressing interest, 94 consented. Recruitment posts on Facebook yielded the most 'expressions of interest' (66%, n = 111). After screening for eligibility, we included 55 participants. Of these, 19 were randomised to be offered the intervention. Of these, less than half (n = 8) consented to intervention participation. Remote case manager and work-familiarisation sessions appeared feasible. Following a delay in identifying placements, three participants received offers of work placements, with one starting and completing during the pilot period. Data collection methods were feasible, and no adverse events were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Recruitment and logistical processes, such as remote management by video link, are feasible. However, delivery of the intervention is challenging. In particular, sourcing placements and the time required for identifying appropriate placements was more challenging than anticipated. A full-scale trial is feasible but will require improvements to the placement identification processes.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ISRCTN85437524 (Referring to the ReISE trial, of which this internal pilot was a part), Registered 31 of May 2022 https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN85437524 TRIAL FUNDING: Norwegian Research Council.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pilot and Feasibility Studies\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"110\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11321075/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pilot and Feasibility Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-024-01538-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pilot and Feasibility Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-024-01538-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在挪威,持续疼痛是导致病假和工作残疾的一个常见原因。在英国开发的一项以支持性工作安置为特色的重返工作岗位干预措施证明了其可行性,在样本中观察到,6个月内重返工作岗位的比例为20%。我们试图调整该干预措施,使其适用于挪威,并在全面试验前确认其可行性:在这次内部试点中,我们采用了一种务实的队列随机对照方法,在挪威全国范围内进行招募。我们招募了失业(至少1个月)、持续疼痛(至少3个月)、年龄在18至64岁之间、希望重返工作岗位的人。我们最初招募的对象是一项观察性队列研究,研究对象是失业并伴有持续疼痛所造成的影响。在进行基线测量后,我们随机抽取参与者进行干预,干预内容包括个人个案管理和支持、工作熟悉课程以及为期 6 周的无偿兼职工作安排。我们评估了招募率(目标是招募 66 人,并在 6 个月内抽取 17 个样本)、最佳招募途径、干预接受率、数据收集的可行性、使用视频链接进行工作熟悉课程和远程个案经理支持:试点时间为 2022 年 6 月至 11 月。168人表示有兴趣,其中94人同意。在 Facebook 上发布的招募信息获得了最多的 "意向表达"(66%,n = 111)。经过资格筛选,我们纳入了 55 名参与者。其中,19 人被随机纳入干预计划。其中,不到一半的参与者(n = 8)同意参与干预。远程个案经理和工作熟悉课程似乎是可行的。在确定工作岗位方面出现延误后,三名参与者收到了工作岗位通知,其中一人在试点期间开始工作并完成了工作。数据收集方法可行,没有不良事件报告:结论:招募和后勤流程(如通过视频链接进行远程管理)是可行的。结论:招募和后勤流程,如通过视频连接进行远程管理,是可行的。特别是,寻找安置地点和确定合适安置地点所需的时间比预期的更具挑战性。全面试验是可行的,但需要改进安置识别流程:试验注册:ISRCTN85437524(指 ReISE 试验,本内部试验是其一部分),注册日期为 2022 年 5 月 31 日 https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN85437524 试验资助:挪威研究理事会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Individual supported work placements (ReISE) for improving sustained return to work in unemployed people with persistent pain: an internal pilot study of a cohort randomised controlled approach.

Background: Persistent pain is a frequent cause of sick leave and work disability in Norway. A return-to-work intervention featuring supported work placements, developed in the UK, demonstrated feasibility, and a return-to-work rate of 20% within 6 months was observed in the sample. We sought to adapt the intervention for delivery in Norway and to confirm feasibility prior to a full-scale trial.

Methods: In this internal pilot, we used a pragmatic cohort randomised controlled approach with national recruitment in Norway. We recruited people who were unemployed (for at least 1 month), having persistent pain (for at least 3 months), aged between 18 and 64, and wanting to return to work. We initially recruited people to an observational cohort study of the impact of being unemployed with persistent pain. After baseline measurement, we randomly sub-sampled participants to whom we offered the intervention, which featured individual case management and support, work-familiarisation sessions, and the offer of a 6-week part-time unpaid work placement. We assessed recruitment rates (aiming to recruit 66, and sub-sample 17 within 6 months); optimal recruitment pathways; intervention acceptance rates; the feasibility of data collection; using video links for work-familiarisation sessions and remote case manager support.

Results: The pilot ran from June to November 2022. Of 168 people expressing interest, 94 consented. Recruitment posts on Facebook yielded the most 'expressions of interest' (66%, n = 111). After screening for eligibility, we included 55 participants. Of these, 19 were randomised to be offered the intervention. Of these, less than half (n = 8) consented to intervention participation. Remote case manager and work-familiarisation sessions appeared feasible. Following a delay in identifying placements, three participants received offers of work placements, with one starting and completing during the pilot period. Data collection methods were feasible, and no adverse events were reported.

Conclusions: Recruitment and logistical processes, such as remote management by video link, are feasible. However, delivery of the intervention is challenging. In particular, sourcing placements and the time required for identifying appropriate placements was more challenging than anticipated. A full-scale trial is feasible but will require improvements to the placement identification processes.

Trial registration: ISRCTN85437524 (Referring to the ReISE trial, of which this internal pilot was a part), Registered 31 of May 2022 https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN85437524 TRIAL FUNDING: Norwegian Research Council.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
Pilot and Feasibility Studies Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
241
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Pilot and Feasibility Studies encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of pilot and feasibility studies in biomedicine. The journal publishes research articles that are intended to directly influence future clinical trials or large scale observational studies, as well as protocols, commentaries and methodology articles. The journal also ensures that the results of all well-conducted, peer-reviewed, pilot and feasibility studies are published, regardless of outcome or significance of findings. Pilot and feasibility studies are increasingly conducted prior to a full randomized controlled trial. However, these studies often lack clear objectives, many remain unpublished, and there is confusion over the meanings of the words “pilot” and “feasibility”. Pilot and Feasibility Studies provides a forum for discussion around this key aspect of the scientific process, and seeks to ensure that these studies are published, so as to complete the publication thread for clinical research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信