与品牌产品相比,仿制药 Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir 的生物等效性和安全性:一项针对健康志愿者的随机交叉研究。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Sergei Noskov, Olesya Parulya, Lyudmila Lutskova, Anna Arefeva, Ekaterina Protsenko, Veniamin Banko, Kseniia Radaeva, Iuliia Matvienko, Maria Gefen, Polina Karnakova, Alina Knyazeva, Timofey Komarov, Olga Archakova, Igor Shohin
{"title":"与品牌产品相比,仿制药 Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir 的生物等效性和安全性:一项针对健康志愿者的随机交叉研究。","authors":"Sergei Noskov, Olesya Parulya, Lyudmila Lutskova, Anna Arefeva, Ekaterina Protsenko, Veniamin Banko, Kseniia Radaeva, Iuliia Matvienko, Maria Gefen, Polina Karnakova, Alina Knyazeva, Timofey Komarov, Olga Archakova, Igor Shohin","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.1463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This was an open-label, randomized, single-dose, 2-period, crossover clinical trial with an adaptive design to evaluate the bioequivalence and comparative pharmacokinetics of generic glecaprevir/pibrentasvir versus the brand name product in healthy White male and female volunteers under fed conditions. Safety profiles were also assessed. A total of 56 healthy adult volunteers were enrolled and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive a single dose of either the generic or reference formulation. After a 7-day washout period, subjects received the alternate product. Blood samples were collected at pre-specified time points up to 48 hours post-dosing. Plasma concentrations of glecaprevir and pibrentasvir were determined using a validated high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. The geometric mean ratios of the test to the reference formulation for maximum plasma concentration (C<sub>max</sub>) and area under the concentration-time curve from drug administration to the last measurable concentration (AUC<sub>0-t</sub>) fell within the predefined bioequivalence range of 80%-125%. Both formulations demonstrated comparable pharmacokinetic profiles for glecaprevir and pibrentasvir, and can be considered bioequivalent. No adverse events were reported, and both formulations were well tolerated by all participants.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bioequivalence and Safety of Generic Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir Compared to a Branded Product: A Randomized, Crossover Study in Healthy Volunteers.\",\"authors\":\"Sergei Noskov, Olesya Parulya, Lyudmila Lutskova, Anna Arefeva, Ekaterina Protsenko, Veniamin Banko, Kseniia Radaeva, Iuliia Matvienko, Maria Gefen, Polina Karnakova, Alina Knyazeva, Timofey Komarov, Olga Archakova, Igor Shohin\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cpdd.1463\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This was an open-label, randomized, single-dose, 2-period, crossover clinical trial with an adaptive design to evaluate the bioequivalence and comparative pharmacokinetics of generic glecaprevir/pibrentasvir versus the brand name product in healthy White male and female volunteers under fed conditions. Safety profiles were also assessed. A total of 56 healthy adult volunteers were enrolled and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive a single dose of either the generic or reference formulation. After a 7-day washout period, subjects received the alternate product. Blood samples were collected at pre-specified time points up to 48 hours post-dosing. Plasma concentrations of glecaprevir and pibrentasvir were determined using a validated high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. The geometric mean ratios of the test to the reference formulation for maximum plasma concentration (C<sub>max</sub>) and area under the concentration-time curve from drug administration to the last measurable concentration (AUC<sub>0-t</sub>) fell within the predefined bioequivalence range of 80%-125%. Both formulations demonstrated comparable pharmacokinetic profiles for glecaprevir and pibrentasvir, and can be considered bioequivalent. No adverse events were reported, and both formulations were well tolerated by all participants.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpdd.1463\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpdd.1463","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这是一项采用适应性设计的开放标签、随机、单剂量、两阶段、交叉临床试验,目的是评估在喂养条件下,仿制药格列卡韦/匹仑那韦与品牌药格列卡韦/匹仑那韦在健康白人男性和女性志愿者中的生物等效性和药代动力学比较。此外,还对安全性进行了评估。共招募了 56 名健康成年志愿者,并按 1:1 的比例随机分配他们接受单剂量的仿制药或参比制剂。经过 7 天的洗脱期后,受试者接受替代产品。在用药后 48 小时内的指定时间点采集血样。使用经过验证的高效液相色谱-串联质谱法测定格列卡韦和匹仑那韦的血浆浓度。试验制剂与参比制剂的最大血浆浓度(Cmax)和从给药到最后一次可测量浓度的浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC0-t)的几何平均比在 80%-125% 的预定生物等效范围内。两种制剂的格列卡韦和匹仑他韦的药代动力学特征相当,可视为具有生物等效性。没有不良反应报告,所有参与者对两种制剂的耐受性都很好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bioequivalence and Safety of Generic Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir Compared to a Branded Product: A Randomized, Crossover Study in Healthy Volunteers.

This was an open-label, randomized, single-dose, 2-period, crossover clinical trial with an adaptive design to evaluate the bioequivalence and comparative pharmacokinetics of generic glecaprevir/pibrentasvir versus the brand name product in healthy White male and female volunteers under fed conditions. Safety profiles were also assessed. A total of 56 healthy adult volunteers were enrolled and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive a single dose of either the generic or reference formulation. After a 7-day washout period, subjects received the alternate product. Blood samples were collected at pre-specified time points up to 48 hours post-dosing. Plasma concentrations of glecaprevir and pibrentasvir were determined using a validated high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. The geometric mean ratios of the test to the reference formulation for maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration-time curve from drug administration to the last measurable concentration (AUC0-t) fell within the predefined bioequivalence range of 80%-125%. Both formulations demonstrated comparable pharmacokinetic profiles for glecaprevir and pibrentasvir, and can be considered bioequivalent. No adverse events were reported, and both formulations were well tolerated by all participants.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
154
期刊介绍: Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development is an international, peer-reviewed, online publication focused on publishing high-quality clinical pharmacology studies in drug development which are primarily (but not exclusively) performed in early development phases in healthy subjects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信