大学倾销权合同中与健康、营养和健康饮料推广有关的条款:内容分析。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Eva Greenthal, Katherine Marx, Elyse R Grossman, Martha Ruffin, Stephanie A Lucas, Sara E Benjamin-Neelon
{"title":"大学倾销权合同中与健康、营养和健康饮料推广有关的条款:内容分析。","authors":"Eva Greenthal, Katherine Marx, Elyse R Grossman, Martha Ruffin, Stephanie A Lucas, Sara E Benjamin-Neelon","doi":"10.1177/08901171241271402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Many universities maintain pouring rights contracts (PRCs) with beverage companies wherein one company exchanges sponsorship payments for exclusive beverage marketing rights. Separately, universities may have healthy beverage initiatives (HBIs) to encourage healthier choices on campus. This study aimed to assess how and how frequently PRCs included provisions related to health and nutrition to examine how PRCs may support or undermine HBIs.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>U.S. public universities with >20,000 students.</p><p><strong>Sample: </strong>131 PRCs obtained from 124 of 143 universities in 2019-2020.</p><p><strong>Measures: </strong>Primary outcomes were the presence of provisions that could encourage or discourage promotion of healthy beverages (water, diet soda, unsweetened coffee or tea, and 100% juice), and any other provisions explicitly or implicitly referencing health or nutrition.</p><p><strong>Analysis: </strong>Descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve contracts (9%) had explicit commitments from the company or university to promote healthy beverages or adhere to nutrition standards, including five committing to support HBIs, four committing to healthy vending policies, and three describing activities to promote healthy beverage brands. Ten (8%) had provisions explicitly inhibiting water promotion and 55 (42%) had provisions that could be interpreted that way. Eleven (8%) included other health and nutrition provisions, such as funding for unspecified wellness activities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most university beverage contracts did not expressly aim to support healthy choices, and more than half had provisions potentially limiting universities' ability to implement HBIs. When present, nutrition standards were weak.</p>","PeriodicalId":7481,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health Promotion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Provisions Related to Health, Nutrition, and Healthy Beverage Promotion in University Pouring Rights Contracts: A Content Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Eva Greenthal, Katherine Marx, Elyse R Grossman, Martha Ruffin, Stephanie A Lucas, Sara E Benjamin-Neelon\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08901171241271402\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Many universities maintain pouring rights contracts (PRCs) with beverage companies wherein one company exchanges sponsorship payments for exclusive beverage marketing rights. Separately, universities may have healthy beverage initiatives (HBIs) to encourage healthier choices on campus. This study aimed to assess how and how frequently PRCs included provisions related to health and nutrition to examine how PRCs may support or undermine HBIs.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>U.S. public universities with >20,000 students.</p><p><strong>Sample: </strong>131 PRCs obtained from 124 of 143 universities in 2019-2020.</p><p><strong>Measures: </strong>Primary outcomes were the presence of provisions that could encourage or discourage promotion of healthy beverages (water, diet soda, unsweetened coffee or tea, and 100% juice), and any other provisions explicitly or implicitly referencing health or nutrition.</p><p><strong>Analysis: </strong>Descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve contracts (9%) had explicit commitments from the company or university to promote healthy beverages or adhere to nutrition standards, including five committing to support HBIs, four committing to healthy vending policies, and three describing activities to promote healthy beverage brands. Ten (8%) had provisions explicitly inhibiting water promotion and 55 (42%) had provisions that could be interpreted that way. Eleven (8%) included other health and nutrition provisions, such as funding for unspecified wellness activities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most university beverage contracts did not expressly aim to support healthy choices, and more than half had provisions potentially limiting universities' ability to implement HBIs. When present, nutrition standards were weak.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7481,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Health Promotion\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Health Promotion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08901171241271402\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08901171241271402","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:许多大学与饮料公司签订了倾销权合同(PRC),其中一家公司以赞助费换取独家饮料营销权。此外,大学还可能有健康饮料倡议 (HBI),以鼓励在校园内选择更健康的饮料。本研究旨在评估PRC如何以及如何频繁地包含与健康和营养相关的条款,以研究PRC如何支持或削弱HBI:设计:横断面:样本:2019-2020年从143所大学中的124所大学获得的131份PRC:主要结果:是否存在鼓励或不鼓励推广健康饮料(水、减肥苏打水、不加糖的咖啡或茶、100%果汁)的规定,以及任何其他明确或隐含提及健康或营养的规定:分析:描述性统计:有 12 份合同(占 9%)明确承诺公司或大学将推广健康饮料或遵守营养标准,其中 5 份承诺支持健康饮料倡议,4 份承诺健康自动售货机政策,3 份描述了推广健康饮料品牌的活动。有 10 项(8%)规定明确禁止推广水,有 55 项(42%)规定可以这样理解。有 11 份(8%)合同包含了其他健康与营养条款,如为未指明的健康活动提供资金:结论:大多数大学的饮料合同并没有明确支持健康选择的目标,一半以上的合同条款可能会限制大学实施健康与营养措施的能力。即使有,营养标准也很薄弱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Provisions Related to Health, Nutrition, and Healthy Beverage Promotion in University Pouring Rights Contracts: A Content Analysis.

Purpose: Many universities maintain pouring rights contracts (PRCs) with beverage companies wherein one company exchanges sponsorship payments for exclusive beverage marketing rights. Separately, universities may have healthy beverage initiatives (HBIs) to encourage healthier choices on campus. This study aimed to assess how and how frequently PRCs included provisions related to health and nutrition to examine how PRCs may support or undermine HBIs.

Design: Cross-sectional.

Setting: U.S. public universities with >20,000 students.

Sample: 131 PRCs obtained from 124 of 143 universities in 2019-2020.

Measures: Primary outcomes were the presence of provisions that could encourage or discourage promotion of healthy beverages (water, diet soda, unsweetened coffee or tea, and 100% juice), and any other provisions explicitly or implicitly referencing health or nutrition.

Analysis: Descriptive statistics.

Results: Twelve contracts (9%) had explicit commitments from the company or university to promote healthy beverages or adhere to nutrition standards, including five committing to support HBIs, four committing to healthy vending policies, and three describing activities to promote healthy beverage brands. Ten (8%) had provisions explicitly inhibiting water promotion and 55 (42%) had provisions that could be interpreted that way. Eleven (8%) included other health and nutrition provisions, such as funding for unspecified wellness activities.

Conclusion: Most university beverage contracts did not expressly aim to support healthy choices, and more than half had provisions potentially limiting universities' ability to implement HBIs. When present, nutrition standards were weak.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Health Promotion
American Journal of Health Promotion PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: The editorial goal of the American Journal of Health Promotion is to provide a forum for exchange among the many disciplines involved in health promotion and an interface between researchers and practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信