在高年级实验课程中使用 ChatGPT 进行方法开发和绿色化学教育

IF 2.9 3区 教育学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Emily F. Ruff*, Jeanne L. Franz and Joseph K. West, 
{"title":"在高年级实验课程中使用 ChatGPT 进行方法开发和绿色化学教育","authors":"Emily F. Ruff*,&nbsp;Jeanne L. Franz and Joseph K. West,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c0019310.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT are being used for outlining, writing assistance, and higher-level research tasks in many areas of science. The purpose of the work described here was to assess ChatGPT version 3.5’s ability to help upper-level Analytical and Inorganic Chemistry students find methods and green modifications to use in laboratory proposals. Some students found that ChatGPT provided a helpful starting point, but it mostly gave vague and erroneous responses when asked to provide upper-level methods in these areas, particularly in green chemistry. Few ChatGPT suggestions were useful for students’ proposals. Students usually used reasonable prompts, and they often evaluated ChatGPT outputs correctly; however, most students reported they were not confident using its responses. Some lacked confidence in ChatGPT outputs because it rarely provided references, and some said they preferred formal literature searching. Despite ChatGPT’s deficiencies in producing usable methods, we found evidence that these were valuable exercises for helping students think critically about procedures and artificial intelligence (AI) outputs. An accompanying anonymous survey suggested that student opinions of ChatGPT and AI technologies varied depending on what they had used them for. Based on this work, we offer suggestions for other instructors who wish to design similar method development assignments that incorporate LLMs.</p>","PeriodicalId":43,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical Education","volume":"101 8","pages":"3224–3232 3224–3232"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00193","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using ChatGPT for Method Development and Green Chemistry Education in Upper-Level Laboratory Courses\",\"authors\":\"Emily F. Ruff*,&nbsp;Jeanne L. Franz and Joseph K. West,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c0019310.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00193\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT are being used for outlining, writing assistance, and higher-level research tasks in many areas of science. The purpose of the work described here was to assess ChatGPT version 3.5’s ability to help upper-level Analytical and Inorganic Chemistry students find methods and green modifications to use in laboratory proposals. Some students found that ChatGPT provided a helpful starting point, but it mostly gave vague and erroneous responses when asked to provide upper-level methods in these areas, particularly in green chemistry. Few ChatGPT suggestions were useful for students’ proposals. Students usually used reasonable prompts, and they often evaluated ChatGPT outputs correctly; however, most students reported they were not confident using its responses. Some lacked confidence in ChatGPT outputs because it rarely provided references, and some said they preferred formal literature searching. Despite ChatGPT’s deficiencies in producing usable methods, we found evidence that these were valuable exercises for helping students think critically about procedures and artificial intelligence (AI) outputs. An accompanying anonymous survey suggested that student opinions of ChatGPT and AI technologies varied depending on what they had used them for. Based on this work, we offer suggestions for other instructors who wish to design similar method development assignments that incorporate LLMs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Chemical Education\",\"volume\":\"101 8\",\"pages\":\"3224–3232 3224–3232\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00193\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Chemical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00193\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical Education","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00193","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大型语言模型(LLM),如 ChatGPT,正被用于许多科学领域的大纲制定、写作帮助和更高层次的研究任务。本文所述工作的目的是评估 ChatGPT 3.5 版在帮助分析化学和无机化学高年级学生找到可用于实验室计划书的方法和绿色修改方面的能力。一些学生发现 ChatGPT 提供了一个有用的起点,但当被要求提供这些领域,尤其是绿色化学领域的高年级方法时,它大多给出了模糊和错误的回答。很少有 ChatGPT 建议对学生的提案有用。学生通常会使用合理的提示,他们通常会正确评估 ChatGPT 的输出结果;但是,大多数学生表示,他们对使用 ChatGPT 的答复没有信心。有些人对 ChatGPT 的输出结果缺乏信心,因为它很少提供参考文献,有些人说他们更喜欢正式的文献检索。尽管 ChatGPT 在生成可用方法方面存在不足,但我们发现有证据表明,这些练习对于帮助学生批判性地思考程序和人工智能(AI)输出结果很有价值。一项随附的匿名调查显示,学生对 ChatGPT 和人工智能技术的看法因使用目的而异。在这项工作的基础上,我们为其他希望设计包含 LLM 的类似方法开发作业的教师提供了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Using ChatGPT for Method Development and Green Chemistry Education in Upper-Level Laboratory Courses

Using ChatGPT for Method Development and Green Chemistry Education in Upper-Level Laboratory Courses

Large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT are being used for outlining, writing assistance, and higher-level research tasks in many areas of science. The purpose of the work described here was to assess ChatGPT version 3.5’s ability to help upper-level Analytical and Inorganic Chemistry students find methods and green modifications to use in laboratory proposals. Some students found that ChatGPT provided a helpful starting point, but it mostly gave vague and erroneous responses when asked to provide upper-level methods in these areas, particularly in green chemistry. Few ChatGPT suggestions were useful for students’ proposals. Students usually used reasonable prompts, and they often evaluated ChatGPT outputs correctly; however, most students reported they were not confident using its responses. Some lacked confidence in ChatGPT outputs because it rarely provided references, and some said they preferred formal literature searching. Despite ChatGPT’s deficiencies in producing usable methods, we found evidence that these were valuable exercises for helping students think critically about procedures and artificial intelligence (AI) outputs. An accompanying anonymous survey suggested that student opinions of ChatGPT and AI technologies varied depending on what they had used them for. Based on this work, we offer suggestions for other instructors who wish to design similar method development assignments that incorporate LLMs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Chemical Education
Journal of Chemical Education 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
50.00%
发文量
465
审稿时长
6.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chemical Education is the official journal of the Division of Chemical Education of the American Chemical Society, co-published with the American Chemical Society Publications Division. Launched in 1924, the Journal of Chemical Education is the world’s premier chemical education journal. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed articles and related information as a resource to those in the field of chemical education and to those institutions that serve them. JCE typically addresses chemical content, activities, laboratory experiments, instructional methods, and pedagogies. The Journal serves as a means of communication among people across the world who are interested in the teaching and learning of chemistry. This includes instructors of chemistry from middle school through graduate school, professional staff who support these teaching activities, as well as some scientists in commerce, industry, and government.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信