口服中药联合多奈哌齐治疗轻度认知障碍:系统综述和荟萃分析。

Lingling Liu, Claire Shuiqing Zhang, Anthony Lin Zhang, Yefeng Cai, Charlie Changli Xue
{"title":"口服中药联合多奈哌齐治疗轻度认知障碍:系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Lingling Liu, Claire Shuiqing Zhang, Anthony Lin Zhang, Yefeng Cai, Charlie Changli Xue","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the add-on effects of oral Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) for mild cognitive impairment (MCI), when used in addition to donepezil compared to donepezil alone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Randomized controlled trials comparing these treatments across all types of MCI were identified from nine databases and three registers until August 2023. Outcome measures were Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and adverse events (AEs). Methodological quality was assessed using Cochrane risk-of-bias tool, and evidence certainty was evaluated using the GRADE method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Involving 1611 participants across 20 studies, meta-analysis results indicate that oral CHM combined with donepezil significantly improved cognitive function in MCI patients compared to donepezil alone, as evidenced by MMSE (1.88 [1.52, 2.24], I<sup>2</sup> = 41%, 12 studies, 993 participants) and MoCA (MD: 2.01 [1.57, 2.44], I<sup>2</sup> = 52%, 11 studies, 854 participants). Eleven studies reported details of AEs, identifying gastrointestinal symptoms and insomnia as the most common symptoms. No significant difference in AEs frequency was found between the groups (RR: 0.91 [0.59, 1.39], I<sup>2</sup> = 4%, 11 studies, 808 participants). All 20 studies were evaluated as having \"some concerns\" regarding the overall risk of bias. The certainty of evidence for MMSE was \"moderate\" and \"low\" for MoCA. From frequently utilized herbs, two classical CHM formulae were identified: Kai xin san and Si wu decoction. The observed treatment effects of commonly used herbs may be exerted through multiple pharmacological mechanisms, including anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidative stress, anti-apoptotic actions, promotion of neuronal survival and modulation of the cholinergic system.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The concurrent use of oral CHM and donepezil appears to be more effective than donepezil alone in improving the cognitive function of MCI, without leading to an increase in AEs. While recognizing concerns of overall methodological quality, this combined therapy should be considered as an alternative option for clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":94112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Oral Chinese herbal medicine combined with donepezil for mild cognitive impairment: A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Lingling Liu, Claire Shuiqing Zhang, Anthony Lin Zhang, Yefeng Cai, Charlie Changli Xue\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jgs.19125\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the add-on effects of oral Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) for mild cognitive impairment (MCI), when used in addition to donepezil compared to donepezil alone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Randomized controlled trials comparing these treatments across all types of MCI were identified from nine databases and three registers until August 2023. Outcome measures were Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and adverse events (AEs). Methodological quality was assessed using Cochrane risk-of-bias tool, and evidence certainty was evaluated using the GRADE method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Involving 1611 participants across 20 studies, meta-analysis results indicate that oral CHM combined with donepezil significantly improved cognitive function in MCI patients compared to donepezil alone, as evidenced by MMSE (1.88 [1.52, 2.24], I<sup>2</sup> = 41%, 12 studies, 993 participants) and MoCA (MD: 2.01 [1.57, 2.44], I<sup>2</sup> = 52%, 11 studies, 854 participants). Eleven studies reported details of AEs, identifying gastrointestinal symptoms and insomnia as the most common symptoms. No significant difference in AEs frequency was found between the groups (RR: 0.91 [0.59, 1.39], I<sup>2</sup> = 4%, 11 studies, 808 participants). All 20 studies were evaluated as having \\\"some concerns\\\" regarding the overall risk of bias. The certainty of evidence for MMSE was \\\"moderate\\\" and \\\"low\\\" for MoCA. From frequently utilized herbs, two classical CHM formulae were identified: Kai xin san and Si wu decoction. The observed treatment effects of commonly used herbs may be exerted through multiple pharmacological mechanisms, including anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidative stress, anti-apoptotic actions, promotion of neuronal survival and modulation of the cholinergic system.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The concurrent use of oral CHM and donepezil appears to be more effective than donepezil alone in improving the cognitive function of MCI, without leading to an increase in AEs. While recognizing concerns of overall methodological quality, this combined therapy should be considered as an alternative option for clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94112,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19125\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在评估口服中药与单用多奈哌齐相比,对轻度认知障碍(MCI)的辅助作用:本研究旨在评估口服中药(CHM)治疗轻度认知障碍(MCI)时,与单独使用多奈哌齐相比的附加效果:方法:从九个数据库和三个登记簿中找出了截至 2023 年 8 月的随机对照试验,这些试验比较了所有类型 MCI 的这些治疗方法。结果测量指标为迷你精神状态检查(MMSE)、蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)和不良事件(AEs)。方法学质量采用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具进行评估,证据确定性采用 GRADE 方法进行评估:荟萃分析结果表明,与单独使用多奈哌齐相比,口服CHM联合多奈哌齐可显著改善MCI患者的认知功能,这体现在MMSE(1.88 [1.52, 2.24], I2 = 41%, 12项研究,993名参与者)和MoCA(MD:2.01 [1.57, 2.44], I2 = 52%, 11项研究,854名参与者)上。11项研究报告了AEs的详细情况,其中胃肠道症状和失眠是最常见的症状。各组间的 AEs 频率无明显差异(RR:0.91 [0.59, 1.39],I2 = 4%,11 项研究,808 名参与者)。所有 20 项研究的总体偏倚风险均被评估为 "令人担忧"。MMSE的证据确定性为 "中度",MoCA的证据确定性为 "低度"。从常用的中草药中,确定了两个经典的 CHM 方剂:开心散和四物汤。常用中药的治疗效果可能是通过多种药理机制发挥的,包括抗炎、抗氧化、抗凋亡、促进神经元存活和调节胆碱能系统:结论:在改善 MCI 认知功能方面,同时使用口服 CHM 和多奈哌齐似乎比单独使用多奈哌齐更有效,且不会导致 AEs 增加。在承认整体方法学质量存在问题的同时,这种联合疗法应被视为临床实践中的一种替代选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Oral Chinese herbal medicine combined with donepezil for mild cognitive impairment: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: This study aims to evaluate the add-on effects of oral Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) for mild cognitive impairment (MCI), when used in addition to donepezil compared to donepezil alone.

Methods: Randomized controlled trials comparing these treatments across all types of MCI were identified from nine databases and three registers until August 2023. Outcome measures were Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and adverse events (AEs). Methodological quality was assessed using Cochrane risk-of-bias tool, and evidence certainty was evaluated using the GRADE method.

Results: Involving 1611 participants across 20 studies, meta-analysis results indicate that oral CHM combined with donepezil significantly improved cognitive function in MCI patients compared to donepezil alone, as evidenced by MMSE (1.88 [1.52, 2.24], I2 = 41%, 12 studies, 993 participants) and MoCA (MD: 2.01 [1.57, 2.44], I2 = 52%, 11 studies, 854 participants). Eleven studies reported details of AEs, identifying gastrointestinal symptoms and insomnia as the most common symptoms. No significant difference in AEs frequency was found between the groups (RR: 0.91 [0.59, 1.39], I2 = 4%, 11 studies, 808 participants). All 20 studies were evaluated as having "some concerns" regarding the overall risk of bias. The certainty of evidence for MMSE was "moderate" and "low" for MoCA. From frequently utilized herbs, two classical CHM formulae were identified: Kai xin san and Si wu decoction. The observed treatment effects of commonly used herbs may be exerted through multiple pharmacological mechanisms, including anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidative stress, anti-apoptotic actions, promotion of neuronal survival and modulation of the cholinergic system.

Conclusions: The concurrent use of oral CHM and donepezil appears to be more effective than donepezil alone in improving the cognitive function of MCI, without leading to an increase in AEs. While recognizing concerns of overall methodological quality, this combined therapy should be considered as an alternative option for clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信