[新一代测序与 FISH 法检测 B 细胞淋巴瘤基因重排的一致性比较]。

Q3 Medicine
Z Yan, Z H Yao, S N Yao, S Zhao, H Y Wang, J F Chu, Y L Xu, J Y Zhang, B Wei, J W Zheng, Q X Xia, D Y Wu, X F Luo, W P Zhou, Y Y Liu
{"title":"[新一代测序与 FISH 法检测 B 细胞淋巴瘤基因重排的一致性比较]。","authors":"Z Yan, Z H Yao, S N Yao, S Zhao, H Y Wang, J F Chu, Y L Xu, J Y Zhang, B Wei, J W Zheng, Q X Xia, D Y Wu, X F Luo, W P Zhou, Y Y Liu","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn121090-20231225-00340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To compare the consistency of lymphoma multigene detection panels based on next-generation sequencing (NGS) with FISH detection of B-cell lymphoma gene rearrangement. <b>Methods:</b> From January 2019 to May 2023, fusion genes detected by lymphoma-related 413 genes that targeted capture sequencing of 489 B-cell lymphoma tissues embedded in paraffin were collected from Henan Cancer Hospital, and the results were compared with simultaneous FISH detection of four break/fusion genes: BCL2, BCL6, MYC, and CCND1. Consistency was defined as both methods yielding positive or negative results for the same sample. The relationship between fusion mutation abundance in NGS and the positivity rate of cells in FISH was also analyzed. <b>Results:</b> Kappa consistency analysis revealed high consistency between NGS and FISH in detecting the four B-cell lymphoma-related gene rearrangement (<i>P</i><0.001 for all) ; however, the detection rates of positive individuals differed for the four genes. Compared with FISH, NGS demonstrated a higher detection rate for BCL2 rearrangement, a lower detection rate for BCL6 and MYC rearrangement, and a similar detection rate for CCND1 rearrangement. No correlation was found between fusion mutation abundance in NGS and the positivity rate of cells in FISH. <b>Conclusions:</b> NGS and FISH detection of B-cell lymphoma gene rearrangement demonstrate overall good consistency. NGS is superior to FISH in detecting BCL2 rearrangement, inferior in detecting MYC rearrangement, and comparable in detecting CCND1 rearrangement.</p>","PeriodicalId":24016,"journal":{"name":"Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[A consistency comparison between next-generation sequencing and the FISH method for gene rearrangement detection in B-cell lymphomas].\",\"authors\":\"Z Yan, Z H Yao, S N Yao, S Zhao, H Y Wang, J F Chu, Y L Xu, J Y Zhang, B Wei, J W Zheng, Q X Xia, D Y Wu, X F Luo, W P Zhou, Y Y Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/cma.j.cn121090-20231225-00340\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To compare the consistency of lymphoma multigene detection panels based on next-generation sequencing (NGS) with FISH detection of B-cell lymphoma gene rearrangement. <b>Methods:</b> From January 2019 to May 2023, fusion genes detected by lymphoma-related 413 genes that targeted capture sequencing of 489 B-cell lymphoma tissues embedded in paraffin were collected from Henan Cancer Hospital, and the results were compared with simultaneous FISH detection of four break/fusion genes: BCL2, BCL6, MYC, and CCND1. Consistency was defined as both methods yielding positive or negative results for the same sample. The relationship between fusion mutation abundance in NGS and the positivity rate of cells in FISH was also analyzed. <b>Results:</b> Kappa consistency analysis revealed high consistency between NGS and FISH in detecting the four B-cell lymphoma-related gene rearrangement (<i>P</i><0.001 for all) ; however, the detection rates of positive individuals differed for the four genes. Compared with FISH, NGS demonstrated a higher detection rate for BCL2 rearrangement, a lower detection rate for BCL6 and MYC rearrangement, and a similar detection rate for CCND1 rearrangement. No correlation was found between fusion mutation abundance in NGS and the positivity rate of cells in FISH. <b>Conclusions:</b> NGS and FISH detection of B-cell lymphoma gene rearrangement demonstrate overall good consistency. NGS is superior to FISH in detecting BCL2 rearrangement, inferior in detecting MYC rearrangement, and comparable in detecting CCND1 rearrangement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":24016,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn121090-20231225-00340\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn121090-20231225-00340","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的比较基于新一代测序(NGS)的淋巴瘤多基因检测面板与 FISH 检测 B 细胞淋巴瘤基因重排的一致性。方法:从 2019 年 1 月至 2023 年 5 月,对检测到的基因重排进行分析:2019年1月至2023年5月,收集河南省肿瘤医院489例石蜡包埋B细胞淋巴瘤组织的淋巴瘤相关413个基因靶向捕获测序检测的融合基因,结果与同时FISH检测4个断裂/融合基因进行比较:结果与同时进行的 BCL2、BCL6、MYC 和 CCND1 四种断裂/融合基因的 FISH 检测结果进行了比较。一致性是指两种方法对同一样本的检测结果均为阳性或阴性。还分析了 NGS 中融合突变丰度与 FISH 中细胞阳性率之间的关系。结果卡帕一致性分析表明,NGS 和 FISH 在检测四种 B 细胞淋巴瘤相关基因重排(PConclusions:NGS 和 FISH 对 B 细胞淋巴瘤基因重排的检测总体上表现出良好的一致性。NGS 在检测 BCL2 基因重排方面优于 FISH,在检测 MYC 基因重排方面不如 FISH,而在检测 CCND1 基因重排方面不相上下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[A consistency comparison between next-generation sequencing and the FISH method for gene rearrangement detection in B-cell lymphomas].

Objective: To compare the consistency of lymphoma multigene detection panels based on next-generation sequencing (NGS) with FISH detection of B-cell lymphoma gene rearrangement. Methods: From January 2019 to May 2023, fusion genes detected by lymphoma-related 413 genes that targeted capture sequencing of 489 B-cell lymphoma tissues embedded in paraffin were collected from Henan Cancer Hospital, and the results were compared with simultaneous FISH detection of four break/fusion genes: BCL2, BCL6, MYC, and CCND1. Consistency was defined as both methods yielding positive or negative results for the same sample. The relationship between fusion mutation abundance in NGS and the positivity rate of cells in FISH was also analyzed. Results: Kappa consistency analysis revealed high consistency between NGS and FISH in detecting the four B-cell lymphoma-related gene rearrangement (P<0.001 for all) ; however, the detection rates of positive individuals differed for the four genes. Compared with FISH, NGS demonstrated a higher detection rate for BCL2 rearrangement, a lower detection rate for BCL6 and MYC rearrangement, and a similar detection rate for CCND1 rearrangement. No correlation was found between fusion mutation abundance in NGS and the positivity rate of cells in FISH. Conclusions: NGS and FISH detection of B-cell lymphoma gene rearrangement demonstrate overall good consistency. NGS is superior to FISH in detecting BCL2 rearrangement, inferior in detecting MYC rearrangement, and comparable in detecting CCND1 rearrangement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
100
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信