美国军队医疗系统中纤维肌痛的诊断和治疗情况。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Germaine F Herrera, Patricia K Carreño, Ysehak Wondwossen, Alexander G Velosky, Michael S Patzkowski, Krista B Highland
{"title":"美国军队医疗系统中纤维肌痛的诊断和治疗情况。","authors":"Germaine F Herrera, Patricia K Carreño, Ysehak Wondwossen, Alexander G Velosky, Michael S Patzkowski, Krista B Highland","doi":"10.1093/milmed/usae384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Meta-analytic findings and clinical practice guidance recommend pharmacological (e.g., pregabalin, duloxetine, and milnacipran) and non-pharmacological (e.g., exercise and sleep hygiene) interventions to reduce symptoms and improve quality of life in people living with fibromyalgia. However, some of these therapies may lack robust evidence as to their efficacy, have side effects that may outweigh benefits, or carry risks. Although the annual prevalence of fibromyalgia in active duty service members was estimated to be 0.015% in 2018, the likelihood of receiving a fibromyalgia diagnosis was 9 times greater in patients assigned female than male and twice as common in non-Hispanic Black than White service members. Therefore, the primary goal of this retrospective study is to examine co-occurring conditions and pain-management care receipt in the 3 months before and 3 months after fibromyalgia diagnosis in active duty service members from 2015 to 2022.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Medical record information from active duty service members who received a fibromyalgia diagnosis between 2015 and 2022 in the U.S. Military Health System was included in the analyses. Bivariate analyses evaluated inequities in co-occurring diagnoses (abdominal and pelvic pain, insomnia, psychiatric conditions, and migraines), health care (acupuncture and dry needling, biofeedback and other muscle relaxation, chiropractic and osteopathic treatments, exercise classes and activities, massage therapy, behavioral health care, other physical interventions, physical therapy, self-care management, and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation), and prescription receipt (anxiolytics, gabapentinoids, muscle relaxants, non-opioid pain medication, opioids, selective serotonin and norepinephrine inhibitors, and tramadol) across race and ethnicity and assigned sex. Pairwise comparisons were made using a false discovery rate adjusted P value.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 13,663 service members received a fibromyalgia diagnosis during the study period. Approximately 52% received a follow-up visit within 3 months of index diagnosis. Most service members received a co-occurring psychiatric diagnosis (35%), followed by insomnia (24%), migraines (20%), and abdominal and pelvic pain diagnoses (19%) fibromyalgia diagnosis. At least half received exercise classes and activities (52%), behavioral health care (52%), or physical therapy (50%). Less commonly received therapies included other physical interventions (41%), chiropractic/osteopathic care (40%), massage therapy (40%), transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (33%), self-care education (29%), biofeedback and other muscle relaxation therapies (22%), and acupuncture or dry needling (14%). The most common prescriptions received were non-opioid pain medications (72%), followed by muscle relaxers (44%), opioids (32%), anxiolytics (31%), gabapentinoids (26%), serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (21%), selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (20%), and tramadol (15%). There were many inequities identified across outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, service members diagnosed with fibromyalgia received variable guideline-congruent health care within the 3 months before and after fibromyalgia diagnosis. Almost 1 in 3 service members received an opioid prescription, which has been explicitly recommended against use in guidelines. Pairwise comparisons indicated unwarranted variation across assigned sex and race and ethnicity in both co-occurring health conditions and care receipt. Underlying reasons for health and health care inequities can be multisourced and modifiable. It is unclear whether the U.S. Military Health System has consolidated patient resources to support patients living with fibromyalgia and if so, the extent to which such resources are accessible and known to patients and their clinicians.</p>","PeriodicalId":18638,"journal":{"name":"Military Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"e666-e674"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fibromyalgia Diagnosis and Treatment Receipt in the U.S. Military Health System.\",\"authors\":\"Germaine F Herrera, Patricia K Carreño, Ysehak Wondwossen, Alexander G Velosky, Michael S Patzkowski, Krista B Highland\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/milmed/usae384\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Meta-analytic findings and clinical practice guidance recommend pharmacological (e.g., pregabalin, duloxetine, and milnacipran) and non-pharmacological (e.g., exercise and sleep hygiene) interventions to reduce symptoms and improve quality of life in people living with fibromyalgia. However, some of these therapies may lack robust evidence as to their efficacy, have side effects that may outweigh benefits, or carry risks. Although the annual prevalence of fibromyalgia in active duty service members was estimated to be 0.015% in 2018, the likelihood of receiving a fibromyalgia diagnosis was 9 times greater in patients assigned female than male and twice as common in non-Hispanic Black than White service members. Therefore, the primary goal of this retrospective study is to examine co-occurring conditions and pain-management care receipt in the 3 months before and 3 months after fibromyalgia diagnosis in active duty service members from 2015 to 2022.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Medical record information from active duty service members who received a fibromyalgia diagnosis between 2015 and 2022 in the U.S. Military Health System was included in the analyses. Bivariate analyses evaluated inequities in co-occurring diagnoses (abdominal and pelvic pain, insomnia, psychiatric conditions, and migraines), health care (acupuncture and dry needling, biofeedback and other muscle relaxation, chiropractic and osteopathic treatments, exercise classes and activities, massage therapy, behavioral health care, other physical interventions, physical therapy, self-care management, and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation), and prescription receipt (anxiolytics, gabapentinoids, muscle relaxants, non-opioid pain medication, opioids, selective serotonin and norepinephrine inhibitors, and tramadol) across race and ethnicity and assigned sex. Pairwise comparisons were made using a false discovery rate adjusted P value.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 13,663 service members received a fibromyalgia diagnosis during the study period. Approximately 52% received a follow-up visit within 3 months of index diagnosis. Most service members received a co-occurring psychiatric diagnosis (35%), followed by insomnia (24%), migraines (20%), and abdominal and pelvic pain diagnoses (19%) fibromyalgia diagnosis. At least half received exercise classes and activities (52%), behavioral health care (52%), or physical therapy (50%). Less commonly received therapies included other physical interventions (41%), chiropractic/osteopathic care (40%), massage therapy (40%), transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (33%), self-care education (29%), biofeedback and other muscle relaxation therapies (22%), and acupuncture or dry needling (14%). The most common prescriptions received were non-opioid pain medications (72%), followed by muscle relaxers (44%), opioids (32%), anxiolytics (31%), gabapentinoids (26%), serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (21%), selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (20%), and tramadol (15%). There were many inequities identified across outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, service members diagnosed with fibromyalgia received variable guideline-congruent health care within the 3 months before and after fibromyalgia diagnosis. Almost 1 in 3 service members received an opioid prescription, which has been explicitly recommended against use in guidelines. Pairwise comparisons indicated unwarranted variation across assigned sex and race and ethnicity in both co-occurring health conditions and care receipt. Underlying reasons for health and health care inequities can be multisourced and modifiable. It is unclear whether the U.S. Military Health System has consolidated patient resources to support patients living with fibromyalgia and if so, the extent to which such resources are accessible and known to patients and their clinicians.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18638,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Military Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e666-e674\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Military Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usae384\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Military Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usae384","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介Meta 分析结果和临床实践指南推荐了药物(如普瑞巴林、度洛西汀和米那西普兰)和非药物(如运动和睡眠卫生)干预措施,以减轻纤维肌痛患者的症状并改善其生活质量。然而,其中一些疗法的疗效可能缺乏有力证据,副作用可能大于益处,或存在风险。尽管 2018 年现役军人中纤维肌痛的年发病率估计为 0.015%,但在被分配到女性的患者中,纤维肌痛诊断的可能性是男性的 9 倍,在非西班牙裔黑人军人中的常见程度是白人的两倍。因此,这项回顾性研究的主要目的是检查 2015 年至 2022 年现役军人纤维肌痛诊断前 3 个月和诊断后 3 个月的并发症和疼痛管理护理接受情况:分析纳入了 2015 年至 2022 年期间在美国军事卫生系统接受纤维肌痛诊断的现役军人的病历信息。双变量分析评估了并发诊断(腹部和骨盆疼痛、失眠、精神疾病和偏头痛)、医疗保健(针灸和干针疗法、生物反馈和其他肌肉放松疗法、脊椎按摩和整骨疗法、运动课程和活动、按摩疗法、行为医疗保健、其他物理干预措施、物理治疗、自我保健)方面的不平等、其他物理干预、物理治疗、自我护理管理和经皮神经电刺激),以及不同种族和民族以及指定性别的处方接受情况(抗焦虑药、加巴喷丁类药物、肌肉松弛剂、非阿片类止痛药、阿片类药物、选择性血清素和去甲肾上腺素抑制剂以及曲马多)。使用假发现率调整后的 P 值进行配对比较:在研究期间,共有 13,663 名军人被诊断患有纤维肌痛。约 52% 的人在确诊后 3 个月内接受了随访。大多数军人接受了并发精神病诊断(35%),其次是失眠(24%)、偏头痛(20%)以及腹部和骨盆疼痛诊断(19%)纤维肌痛诊断。至少有一半人接受过运动课程和活动(52%)、行为健康护理(52%)或物理治疗(50%)。较少接受的疗法包括其他物理干预(41%)、整脊/整骨疗法(40%)、按摩疗法(40%)、经皮神经电刺激(33%)、自我保健教育(29%)、生物反馈和其他肌肉放松疗法(22%)以及针灸或干针疗法(14%)。最常见的处方是非阿片类止痛药(72%),其次是肌肉松弛剂(44%)、阿片类(32%)、抗焦虑药(31%)、加巴喷丁类(26%)、血清素-去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂(21%)、选择性血清素再摄取抑制剂(20%)和曲马多(15%)。在各种结果中发现了许多不公平现象:总体而言,被诊断为纤维肌痛的军人在纤维肌痛确诊前后 3 个月内接受的与指南一致的医疗保健服务各不相同。几乎每3名军人中就有1人接受了阿片类药物处方,而指南中明确建议不要使用阿片类药物。配对比较显示,在并发健康状况和接受医疗服务方面,不同性别、种族和民族之间存在不必要的差异。造成健康和医疗不平等的根本原因可能是多方面的,也是可以改变的。目前尚不清楚美国军事卫生系统是否整合了患者资源来支持纤维肌痛患者,如果是,患者及其临床医生在多大程度上可以获得并了解这些资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fibromyalgia Diagnosis and Treatment Receipt in the U.S. Military Health System.

Introduction: Meta-analytic findings and clinical practice guidance recommend pharmacological (e.g., pregabalin, duloxetine, and milnacipran) and non-pharmacological (e.g., exercise and sleep hygiene) interventions to reduce symptoms and improve quality of life in people living with fibromyalgia. However, some of these therapies may lack robust evidence as to their efficacy, have side effects that may outweigh benefits, or carry risks. Although the annual prevalence of fibromyalgia in active duty service members was estimated to be 0.015% in 2018, the likelihood of receiving a fibromyalgia diagnosis was 9 times greater in patients assigned female than male and twice as common in non-Hispanic Black than White service members. Therefore, the primary goal of this retrospective study is to examine co-occurring conditions and pain-management care receipt in the 3 months before and 3 months after fibromyalgia diagnosis in active duty service members from 2015 to 2022.

Materials and methods: Medical record information from active duty service members who received a fibromyalgia diagnosis between 2015 and 2022 in the U.S. Military Health System was included in the analyses. Bivariate analyses evaluated inequities in co-occurring diagnoses (abdominal and pelvic pain, insomnia, psychiatric conditions, and migraines), health care (acupuncture and dry needling, biofeedback and other muscle relaxation, chiropractic and osteopathic treatments, exercise classes and activities, massage therapy, behavioral health care, other physical interventions, physical therapy, self-care management, and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation), and prescription receipt (anxiolytics, gabapentinoids, muscle relaxants, non-opioid pain medication, opioids, selective serotonin and norepinephrine inhibitors, and tramadol) across race and ethnicity and assigned sex. Pairwise comparisons were made using a false discovery rate adjusted P value.

Results: Overall, 13,663 service members received a fibromyalgia diagnosis during the study period. Approximately 52% received a follow-up visit within 3 months of index diagnosis. Most service members received a co-occurring psychiatric diagnosis (35%), followed by insomnia (24%), migraines (20%), and abdominal and pelvic pain diagnoses (19%) fibromyalgia diagnosis. At least half received exercise classes and activities (52%), behavioral health care (52%), or physical therapy (50%). Less commonly received therapies included other physical interventions (41%), chiropractic/osteopathic care (40%), massage therapy (40%), transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (33%), self-care education (29%), biofeedback and other muscle relaxation therapies (22%), and acupuncture or dry needling (14%). The most common prescriptions received were non-opioid pain medications (72%), followed by muscle relaxers (44%), opioids (32%), anxiolytics (31%), gabapentinoids (26%), serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (21%), selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (20%), and tramadol (15%). There were many inequities identified across outcomes.

Conclusion: Overall, service members diagnosed with fibromyalgia received variable guideline-congruent health care within the 3 months before and after fibromyalgia diagnosis. Almost 1 in 3 service members received an opioid prescription, which has been explicitly recommended against use in guidelines. Pairwise comparisons indicated unwarranted variation across assigned sex and race and ethnicity in both co-occurring health conditions and care receipt. Underlying reasons for health and health care inequities can be multisourced and modifiable. It is unclear whether the U.S. Military Health System has consolidated patient resources to support patients living with fibromyalgia and if so, the extent to which such resources are accessible and known to patients and their clinicians.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Military Medicine
Military Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
393
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Military Medicine is the official international journal of AMSUS. Articles published in the journal are peer-reviewed scientific papers, case reports, and editorials. The journal also publishes letters to the editor. The objective of the journal is to promote awareness of federal medicine by providing a forum for responsible discussion of common ideas and problems relevant to federal healthcare. Its mission is: To increase healthcare education by providing scientific and other information to its readers; to facilitate communication; and to offer a prestige publication for members’ writings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信