术中骨膜下抬高尺神经是减少肱骨远端骨折术后尺神经炎的一种安全有效的方法。

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Margaret A Sinkler, Luc M Fortier, Mina Ayad, Ramon Arza, Joshua Napora, George Ochenjele
{"title":"术中骨膜下抬高尺神经是减少肱骨远端骨折术后尺神经炎的一种安全有效的方法。","authors":"Margaret A Sinkler, Luc M Fortier, Mina Ayad, Ramon Arza, Joshua Napora, George Ochenjele","doi":"10.1097/BOT.0000000000002898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe subperiosteal elevation of the ulnar nerve and compare to anterior transposition and in situ decompression techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Design: Retrospective comparative study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Urban Level 1 trauma center.</p><p><strong>Patient selection criteria: </strong>Distal humerus fractures (OTA/AO 13) treated with open reduction internal fixation between 2014-2022.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures and comparisons: </strong>Rate of pre- and post-operative neuritis grouped by management of the ulnar nerve. During subperiosteal elevation, the ulnar nerve was identified and raised off the ulna subperiosteally and mobilized submuscularly anterior to the medial epicondyle to protect the nerve. The nerve was released only laterally off the triceps and the medial soft tissue attachment is maintained. The main outcomes measurements was rate of neuritis documented within physical exam.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Within the 125 patients, 35 underwent subperiosteal elevation (mean age of 56 ± 21 years, 57% female), 63 in situ decompression (mean age of 60 ± 18 years, 46% female), and 27 anterior transposition (mean age of 55 ± 20 years, 59% female). Pre-operative ulnar neuritis was present in 34%, 21%, and 33% of patients treated with subperiosteal elevation, in situ decompression, and anterior transposition, respectively (p=0.26). At post-operative evaluation symptom resolution occurred in 100%, 69%, and 33% of patients treated with subperiosteal elevation, in situ decompression, and anterior transposition, respectively (p=0.003). New cases of post-operative ulnar neuritis occurred in 6%, 8%, and 26% of patients treated with subperiosteal elevation, in situ decompression, and anterior transposition, respectively (p=0.054). Subperiosteal elevation outperformed anterior transposition regarding post-operative ulnar neuritis (p=0.019) and symptom resolution (p=0.002) and performed similarly to in situ decompression (p>0.05). On multiple regression analysis, anterior transposition was an independent risk factor for post-operative neuritis (OR=5.2, p=0.023).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Subperiosteal elevation is an effective way to minimize post-operative neuritis and similar to an in-situ decompression during distal humerus fracture fixation. Based on the results of this cohort, authors recommended that anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve be used with caution due to association with post-operative ulnar neuritis.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":16644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intra-operative subperiosteal elevation of the ulnar nerve is a safe and effective way to minimize post-operative ulnar neuritis in distal humerus fractures.\",\"authors\":\"Margaret A Sinkler, Luc M Fortier, Mina Ayad, Ramon Arza, Joshua Napora, George Ochenjele\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BOT.0000000000002898\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe subperiosteal elevation of the ulnar nerve and compare to anterior transposition and in situ decompression techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Design: Retrospective comparative study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Urban Level 1 trauma center.</p><p><strong>Patient selection criteria: </strong>Distal humerus fractures (OTA/AO 13) treated with open reduction internal fixation between 2014-2022.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures and comparisons: </strong>Rate of pre- and post-operative neuritis grouped by management of the ulnar nerve. During subperiosteal elevation, the ulnar nerve was identified and raised off the ulna subperiosteally and mobilized submuscularly anterior to the medial epicondyle to protect the nerve. The nerve was released only laterally off the triceps and the medial soft tissue attachment is maintained. The main outcomes measurements was rate of neuritis documented within physical exam.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Within the 125 patients, 35 underwent subperiosteal elevation (mean age of 56 ± 21 years, 57% female), 63 in situ decompression (mean age of 60 ± 18 years, 46% female), and 27 anterior transposition (mean age of 55 ± 20 years, 59% female). Pre-operative ulnar neuritis was present in 34%, 21%, and 33% of patients treated with subperiosteal elevation, in situ decompression, and anterior transposition, respectively (p=0.26). At post-operative evaluation symptom resolution occurred in 100%, 69%, and 33% of patients treated with subperiosteal elevation, in situ decompression, and anterior transposition, respectively (p=0.003). New cases of post-operative ulnar neuritis occurred in 6%, 8%, and 26% of patients treated with subperiosteal elevation, in situ decompression, and anterior transposition, respectively (p=0.054). Subperiosteal elevation outperformed anterior transposition regarding post-operative ulnar neuritis (p=0.019) and symptom resolution (p=0.002) and performed similarly to in situ decompression (p>0.05). On multiple regression analysis, anterior transposition was an independent risk factor for post-operative neuritis (OR=5.2, p=0.023).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Subperiosteal elevation is an effective way to minimize post-operative neuritis and similar to an in-situ decompression during distal humerus fracture fixation. Based on the results of this cohort, authors recommended that anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve be used with caution due to association with post-operative ulnar neuritis.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16644,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000002898\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000002898","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的描述尺神经骨膜下抬高术,并与前方转位术和原位减压术进行比较:设计:回顾性比较研究:设计:回顾性比较研究:城市一级创伤中心:2014-2022年间接受开放复位内固定治疗的肱骨远端骨折(OTA/AO 13):根据尺神经的处理方式分组的术前和术后神经炎发生率。在骨膜下抬高术中,确定尺神经并将其从尺骨骨膜下抬起,在内侧上髁前方肌肉下移动以保护神经。神经只从肱三头肌外侧松解,内侧软组织附着保持不变。主要测量结果是体格检查中记录的神经炎发生率:在 125 名患者中,35 人接受了骨膜下抬高术(平均年龄为 56 ± 21 岁,女性占 57%),63 人接受了原位减压术(平均年龄为 60 ± 18 岁,女性占 46%),27 人接受了前方转位术(平均年龄为 55 ± 20 岁,女性占 59%)。在接受骨膜下隆起术、原位减压术和前路转位术治疗的患者中,术前出现尺神经炎的比例分别为 34%、21% 和 33%(P=0.26)。在术后评估中,分别有100%、69%和33%的骨膜下抬高术、原位减压术和前路转位术患者症状得到缓解(P=0.003)。在接受骨膜下隆起术、原位减压术和前路转位术治疗的患者中,分别有6%、8%和26%的患者术后出现新的尺神经炎病例(P=0.054)。在术后尺神经炎(p=0.019)和症状缓解(p=0.002)方面,骨膜下抬高术优于前路转位术,与原位减压术效果相似(p>0.05)。多重回归分析显示,前路转位是术后神经炎的独立风险因素(OR=5.2,p=0.023):骨膜下抬高是减少术后神经炎的有效方法,与肱骨远端骨折固定术中的原位减压相似。基于该队列的结果,作者建议慎用尺神经前方转位术,因为该手术与术后尺神经炎有关:预后III级。有关证据等级的完整描述,请参阅 "作者须知"。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intra-operative subperiosteal elevation of the ulnar nerve is a safe and effective way to minimize post-operative ulnar neuritis in distal humerus fractures.

Objectives: To describe subperiosteal elevation of the ulnar nerve and compare to anterior transposition and in situ decompression techniques.

Methods: Design: Retrospective comparative study.

Setting: Urban Level 1 trauma center.

Patient selection criteria: Distal humerus fractures (OTA/AO 13) treated with open reduction internal fixation between 2014-2022.

Outcome measures and comparisons: Rate of pre- and post-operative neuritis grouped by management of the ulnar nerve. During subperiosteal elevation, the ulnar nerve was identified and raised off the ulna subperiosteally and mobilized submuscularly anterior to the medial epicondyle to protect the nerve. The nerve was released only laterally off the triceps and the medial soft tissue attachment is maintained. The main outcomes measurements was rate of neuritis documented within physical exam.

Results: Within the 125 patients, 35 underwent subperiosteal elevation (mean age of 56 ± 21 years, 57% female), 63 in situ decompression (mean age of 60 ± 18 years, 46% female), and 27 anterior transposition (mean age of 55 ± 20 years, 59% female). Pre-operative ulnar neuritis was present in 34%, 21%, and 33% of patients treated with subperiosteal elevation, in situ decompression, and anterior transposition, respectively (p=0.26). At post-operative evaluation symptom resolution occurred in 100%, 69%, and 33% of patients treated with subperiosteal elevation, in situ decompression, and anterior transposition, respectively (p=0.003). New cases of post-operative ulnar neuritis occurred in 6%, 8%, and 26% of patients treated with subperiosteal elevation, in situ decompression, and anterior transposition, respectively (p=0.054). Subperiosteal elevation outperformed anterior transposition regarding post-operative ulnar neuritis (p=0.019) and symptom resolution (p=0.002) and performed similarly to in situ decompression (p>0.05). On multiple regression analysis, anterior transposition was an independent risk factor for post-operative neuritis (OR=5.2, p=0.023).

Conclusions: Subperiosteal elevation is an effective way to minimize post-operative neuritis and similar to an in-situ decompression during distal humerus fracture fixation. Based on the results of this cohort, authors recommended that anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve be used with caution due to association with post-operative ulnar neuritis.

Level of evidence: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 医学-运动科学
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
8.70%
发文量
396
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma is devoted exclusively to the diagnosis and management of hard and soft tissue trauma, including injuries to bone, muscle, ligament, and tendons, as well as spinal cord injuries. Under the guidance of a distinguished international board of editors, the journal provides the most current information on diagnostic techniques, new and improved surgical instruments and procedures, surgical implants and prosthetic devices, bioplastics and biometals; and physical therapy and rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信