评估医生对植物检疫系统的认识、想法和态度。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Expert Opinion on Drug Safety Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-19 DOI:10.1080/14740338.2024.2392866
İçim Gökkaya, Ömer Faruk Özceylan, Beyza Çolak, Gülin Renda, Mine Duman, Erdem Nail Duman
{"title":"评估医生对植物检疫系统的认识、想法和态度。","authors":"İçim Gökkaya, Ömer Faruk Özceylan, Beyza Çolak, Gülin Renda, Mine Duman, Erdem Nail Duman","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2392866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In this study, physicians' awareness of phytovigilance and their knowledge of safety processes for herbal products were evaluated for the first time in Türkiye.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>A descriptive quantitative study was conducted using face-to-face interview techniques with physicians working in a training and research hospital in Türkiye. A total of 268 (35.2%) questionnaires with appropriate data quality were analyzed with IBM SPSS Statistics 23.0. The factors that had the strongest effect on phytovigilance awareness were determined by binary logistic regression analysis. Values of <i>p</i> < 0.05 were accepted as statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey results revealed that 45.5% of physicians were aware of the concept of phytovigilance. Physicians who knew that adverse effects were reported due to the use of herbal products, physicians who asked about the use of herbal products while taking their patients' medical history, and specialist physicians had higher awareness of the concept of phytovigilance. Only 30.2% of participants were aware that feedback on adverse reactions from herbal products was being collected and only 27.2% were aware that there was a phytovigilance contact point in the hospital.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The awareness of physicians regarding phytovigilance should be increased. Physicians should ask about the use of herbal products while taking medical history, identify possible adverse effects associated with herbal products, and provide feedback.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1015-1022"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of physicians' knowledge, thoughts, and attitudes regarding the phytovigilance system.\",\"authors\":\"İçim Gökkaya, Ömer Faruk Özceylan, Beyza Çolak, Gülin Renda, Mine Duman, Erdem Nail Duman\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14740338.2024.2392866\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In this study, physicians' awareness of phytovigilance and their knowledge of safety processes for herbal products were evaluated for the first time in Türkiye.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>A descriptive quantitative study was conducted using face-to-face interview techniques with physicians working in a training and research hospital in Türkiye. A total of 268 (35.2%) questionnaires with appropriate data quality were analyzed with IBM SPSS Statistics 23.0. The factors that had the strongest effect on phytovigilance awareness were determined by binary logistic regression analysis. Values of <i>p</i> < 0.05 were accepted as statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey results revealed that 45.5% of physicians were aware of the concept of phytovigilance. Physicians who knew that adverse effects were reported due to the use of herbal products, physicians who asked about the use of herbal products while taking their patients' medical history, and specialist physicians had higher awareness of the concept of phytovigilance. Only 30.2% of participants were aware that feedback on adverse reactions from herbal products was being collected and only 27.2% were aware that there was a phytovigilance contact point in the hospital.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The awareness of physicians regarding phytovigilance should be increased. Physicians should ask about the use of herbal products while taking medical history, identify possible adverse effects associated with herbal products, and provide feedback.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1015-1022\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2024.2392866\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2024.2392866","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究背景本研究首次评估了土耳其医生对植物警戒的认识及其对草药产品安全程序的了解:研究设计和方法:本研究采用面对面访谈技术,对在土耳其一家培训和研究医院工作的医生进行了描述性定量研究。通过 IBM SPSS Statistics 23.0 对 268 份(35.2%)具有适当数据质量的问卷进行了分析。通过二元逻辑回归分析确定了对植物检疫意识影响最大的因素。p 值结果:调查结果显示,45.5% 的医生了解植物免疫的概念。知道因使用草药产品而出现不良反应的医生、在询问患者病史时了解草药产品使用情况的医生以及专科医生对植物免疫这一概念的认知度较高。只有 30.2% 的参与者知道医院正在收集有关草药产品不良反应的反馈信息,只有 27.2% 的参与者知道医院设有植物检疫联络点:结论:应提高医生对植物检疫的认识。结论:应提高医生对植物药物警戒的认识,医生在询问病史时应问及草药产品的使用情况,识别草药产品可能带来的不良反应,并提供反馈意见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of physicians' knowledge, thoughts, and attitudes regarding the phytovigilance system.

Background: In this study, physicians' awareness of phytovigilance and their knowledge of safety processes for herbal products were evaluated for the first time in Türkiye.

Research design and methods: A descriptive quantitative study was conducted using face-to-face interview techniques with physicians working in a training and research hospital in Türkiye. A total of 268 (35.2%) questionnaires with appropriate data quality were analyzed with IBM SPSS Statistics 23.0. The factors that had the strongest effect on phytovigilance awareness were determined by binary logistic regression analysis. Values of p < 0.05 were accepted as statistically significant.

Results: The survey results revealed that 45.5% of physicians were aware of the concept of phytovigilance. Physicians who knew that adverse effects were reported due to the use of herbal products, physicians who asked about the use of herbal products while taking their patients' medical history, and specialist physicians had higher awareness of the concept of phytovigilance. Only 30.2% of participants were aware that feedback on adverse reactions from herbal products was being collected and only 27.2% were aware that there was a phytovigilance contact point in the hospital.

Conclusion: The awareness of physicians regarding phytovigilance should be increased. Physicians should ask about the use of herbal products while taking medical history, identify possible adverse effects associated with herbal products, and provide feedback.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Drug Safety ranks #62 of 216 in the Pharmacology & Pharmacy category in the 2008 ISI Journal Citation Reports. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (ISSN 1474-0338 [print], 1744-764X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of drug safety and original papers on the clinical implications of drug treatment safety issues, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信