听觉幻象感知中异常预测错误处理的有效连接网络

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Feifan Chen, Mansoureh Fahimi Hnazaee, Sven Vanneste, Anusha Yasoda-Mohan
{"title":"听觉幻象感知中异常预测错误处理的有效连接网络","authors":"Feifan Chen, Mansoureh Fahimi Hnazaee, Sven Vanneste, Anusha Yasoda-Mohan","doi":"10.1089/brain.2024.0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Prediction error (PE) is key to perception in the predictive coding framework. However, previous studies indicated the varied neural activities evoked by PE in tinnitus patients. Here, we aimed to reconcile the conflict by (1) a more nuanced view of PE, which could be driven by changing stimulus (stimulus-driven PE [sPE]) and violation of current context (context-driven PE [cPE]) and (2) investigating the aberrant connectivity networks that are engaged in the processing of the two types of PEs in tinnitus patients. <b>Methods:</b> Ten tinnitus patients with normal hearing and healthy controls were recruited, and a local-global auditory oddball paradigm was applied to measure the electroencephalographic difference between the two groups during sPE and cPE conditions. <b>Results:</b> Overall, the sPE condition engaged bottom-up and top-down connections, whereas the cPE condition engaged mostly top-down connections. The tinnitus group showed decreased sensitivity to the sPE and increased sensitivity to the cPE condition. Particularly, the auditory cortex and posterior cingulate cortex were the hubs for processing cPE in the control and tinnitus groups, respectively, showing the orientation to an internal state in tinnitus. Furthermore, tinnitus patients showed stronger connectivity to the parahippocampus and pregenual anterior cingulate cortex for the establishment of the prediction during the cPE condition. <b>Conclusion:</b> These results begin to dissect the role of changes in stimulus characteristics versus changes in the context of processing the same stimulus in mechanisms of tinnitus generation.</p>","PeriodicalId":9155,"journal":{"name":"Brain connectivity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effective Connectivity Network of Aberrant Prediction Error Processing in Auditory Phantom Perception.\",\"authors\":\"Feifan Chen, Mansoureh Fahimi Hnazaee, Sven Vanneste, Anusha Yasoda-Mohan\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/brain.2024.0013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Prediction error (PE) is key to perception in the predictive coding framework. However, previous studies indicated the varied neural activities evoked by PE in tinnitus patients. Here, we aimed to reconcile the conflict by (1) a more nuanced view of PE, which could be driven by changing stimulus (stimulus-driven PE [sPE]) and violation of current context (context-driven PE [cPE]) and (2) investigating the aberrant connectivity networks that are engaged in the processing of the two types of PEs in tinnitus patients. <b>Methods:</b> Ten tinnitus patients with normal hearing and healthy controls were recruited, and a local-global auditory oddball paradigm was applied to measure the electroencephalographic difference between the two groups during sPE and cPE conditions. <b>Results:</b> Overall, the sPE condition engaged bottom-up and top-down connections, whereas the cPE condition engaged mostly top-down connections. The tinnitus group showed decreased sensitivity to the sPE and increased sensitivity to the cPE condition. Particularly, the auditory cortex and posterior cingulate cortex were the hubs for processing cPE in the control and tinnitus groups, respectively, showing the orientation to an internal state in tinnitus. Furthermore, tinnitus patients showed stronger connectivity to the parahippocampus and pregenual anterior cingulate cortex for the establishment of the prediction during the cPE condition. <b>Conclusion:</b> These results begin to dissect the role of changes in stimulus characteristics versus changes in the context of processing the same stimulus in mechanisms of tinnitus generation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9155,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain connectivity\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain connectivity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/brain.2024.0013\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain connectivity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/brain.2024.0013","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

预测误差(PE)是预测编码框架中感知的关键。然而,以往的研究表明,耳鸣患者的预测错误会诱发不同的神经活动。在此,我们旨在通过以下方法调和这一矛盾:1)从更细微的角度看待预测误差,预测误差可能由刺激变化(刺激驱动的预测误差,sPE)和违反当前语境(语境驱动的预测误差,cPE)驱动;2)研究耳鸣患者参与处理这两种预测误差的异常连接网络。研究人员招募了 10 名听力正常的耳鸣患者和健康对照组患者,并采用局部-全局听觉奇异球范式测量两组患者在 sPE 和 cPE 条件下的脑电图差异。总体而言,sPE 条件涉及自下而上和自上而下的连接,而 cPE 条件主要涉及自上而下的连接。耳鸣组对 sPE 条件的敏感度下降,而对 cPE 条件的敏感度上升。特别是,在对照组和耳鸣组中,听觉皮层和后扣带回皮层分别是处理 cPE 的中心,这表明耳鸣患者对内部状态的定向。此外,在 cPE 条件下,耳鸣患者在建立预测时与副海马和前扣带皮层的连接更强。这些结果开始剖析刺激特征的变化与处理同一刺激的环境变化在耳鸣产生机制中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effective Connectivity Network of Aberrant Prediction Error Processing in Auditory Phantom Perception.

Introduction: Prediction error (PE) is key to perception in the predictive coding framework. However, previous studies indicated the varied neural activities evoked by PE in tinnitus patients. Here, we aimed to reconcile the conflict by (1) a more nuanced view of PE, which could be driven by changing stimulus (stimulus-driven PE [sPE]) and violation of current context (context-driven PE [cPE]) and (2) investigating the aberrant connectivity networks that are engaged in the processing of the two types of PEs in tinnitus patients. Methods: Ten tinnitus patients with normal hearing and healthy controls were recruited, and a local-global auditory oddball paradigm was applied to measure the electroencephalographic difference between the two groups during sPE and cPE conditions. Results: Overall, the sPE condition engaged bottom-up and top-down connections, whereas the cPE condition engaged mostly top-down connections. The tinnitus group showed decreased sensitivity to the sPE and increased sensitivity to the cPE condition. Particularly, the auditory cortex and posterior cingulate cortex were the hubs for processing cPE in the control and tinnitus groups, respectively, showing the orientation to an internal state in tinnitus. Furthermore, tinnitus patients showed stronger connectivity to the parahippocampus and pregenual anterior cingulate cortex for the establishment of the prediction during the cPE condition. Conclusion: These results begin to dissect the role of changes in stimulus characteristics versus changes in the context of processing the same stimulus in mechanisms of tinnitus generation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Brain connectivity
Brain connectivity Neuroscience-General Neuroscience
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: Brain Connectivity provides groundbreaking findings in the rapidly advancing field of connectivity research at the systems and network levels. The Journal disseminates information on brain mapping, modeling, novel research techniques, new imaging modalities, preclinical animal studies, and the translation of research discoveries from the laboratory to the clinic. This essential journal fosters the application of basic biological discoveries and contributes to the development of novel diagnostic and therapeutic interventions to recognize and treat a broad range of neurodegenerative and psychiatric disorders such as: Alzheimer’s disease, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder, epilepsy, traumatic brain injury, stroke, dementia, and depression.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信