卫生和社会护理工作者之间合作的专业性:对芬兰工会成员的调查

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Piiku Pakkanen, Arja Häggman-Laitila, Miko Pasanen, Mari Kangasniemi
{"title":"卫生和社会护理工作者之间合作的专业性:对芬兰工会成员的调查","authors":"Piiku Pakkanen,&nbsp;Arja Häggman-Laitila,&nbsp;Miko Pasanen,&nbsp;Mari Kangasniemi","doi":"10.1155/2024/2418812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><i>Background</i>. Professionalism in collaboration means working based on competencies and ethics, showing accountability and respect in communication and care by each professional group. It is required to ensure seamless, integrated, and quality of care for patients. Previous research has focused on professionalism among single professional groups; little is known about how ethics of professionalism appear in collaboration between different professional groups. Our aim was to fill the gap in this knowledge. The objectives of the study were how health and social care workers evaluated professionalism in collaboration, how professionalism was associated with the various professional groups, and how it was related to the personal characteristics of the workers. <i>Methods</i>. A cross-sectional study with an online survey was conducted in collaboration with 15 professional trade unions in Finland. The 26-item Interprofessional Professionalism Assessment questionnaire was used. The R program, version 4.0.2, was used for advanced descriptive and statistical methods. <i>Results</i>. Together, 1,769 trade union members participated in the study, representing eight professional groups and students from care, rehabilitation, and social services. The mean professionalism score was 4.20 ± 0.70 out of 5, suggesting excellent professionalism in collaboration. Care assistants, childcare and youth workers, and nurses scored professionalism statistically significantly higher than social workers (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Participants who experienced mutual ethical reflections at work (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), received organizational support for ethical practice (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01), and experienced satisfaction at work (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) scored professionalism statistically significantly higher. <i>Conclusions</i>. Professionalism in collaboration between health and social workers was very consistent and strong, despite the fact that different professional groups participated in the survey. Organizations should further work satisfaction and opportunities to participate in shared ethical reflection. Future studies should investigate organizational structures and leadership that support this kind of well-executed professionalism in collaboration between professional groups and if workers recognize these.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/2418812","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Professionalism in Collaboration between Health and Social Care Workers: A Survey to Members of the Finnish Trade Unions\",\"authors\":\"Piiku Pakkanen,&nbsp;Arja Häggman-Laitila,&nbsp;Miko Pasanen,&nbsp;Mari Kangasniemi\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2024/2418812\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n <p><i>Background</i>. Professionalism in collaboration means working based on competencies and ethics, showing accountability and respect in communication and care by each professional group. It is required to ensure seamless, integrated, and quality of care for patients. Previous research has focused on professionalism among single professional groups; little is known about how ethics of professionalism appear in collaboration between different professional groups. Our aim was to fill the gap in this knowledge. The objectives of the study were how health and social care workers evaluated professionalism in collaboration, how professionalism was associated with the various professional groups, and how it was related to the personal characteristics of the workers. <i>Methods</i>. A cross-sectional study with an online survey was conducted in collaboration with 15 professional trade unions in Finland. The 26-item Interprofessional Professionalism Assessment questionnaire was used. The R program, version 4.0.2, was used for advanced descriptive and statistical methods. <i>Results</i>. Together, 1,769 trade union members participated in the study, representing eight professional groups and students from care, rehabilitation, and social services. The mean professionalism score was 4.20 ± 0.70 out of 5, suggesting excellent professionalism in collaboration. Care assistants, childcare and youth workers, and nurses scored professionalism statistically significantly higher than social workers (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Participants who experienced mutual ethical reflections at work (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), received organizational support for ethical practice (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01), and experienced satisfaction at work (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) scored professionalism statistically significantly higher. <i>Conclusions</i>. Professionalism in collaboration between health and social workers was very consistent and strong, despite the fact that different professional groups participated in the survey. Organizations should further work satisfaction and opportunities to participate in shared ethical reflection. Future studies should investigate organizational structures and leadership that support this kind of well-executed professionalism in collaboration between professional groups and if workers recognize these.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/2418812\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/2418812\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/2418812","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景。合作中的专业精神是指每个专业团体在工作中都要以能力和职业道德为基础,在沟通和护理中表现出责任感和尊重。要确保为患者提供无缝、综合和高质量的护理,就必须具备职业精神。以往的研究主要集中在单一专业团体之间的职业精神,而对于不同专业团体之间的合作中如何体现职业道德则知之甚少。我们的目的就是要填补这方面的知识空白。本研究的目标是:医疗和社会护理工作者如何评价合作中的职业道德、职业道德与不同专业团体的关系以及职业道德与工作者个人特征的关系。研究方法我们与芬兰的 15 个专业工会合作开展了一项在线调查的横断面研究。调查使用了 26 个项目的跨专业职业精神评估问卷。高级描述和统计方法使用了 4.0.2 版 R 程序。研究结果共有 1,769 名工会会员参与了研究,他们代表了八个专业团体以及护理、康复和社会服务专业的学生。职业素养的平均得分为 4.20 ± 0.70(满分 5 分),表明在合作中表现出了良好的职业素养。护理助理、儿童保育和青少年工作者以及护士的职业素养得分明显高于社会工作者(p < 0.001)。在工作中经历过相互道德反思(p <0.001)、在道德实践中获得组织支持(p <0.01)以及在工作中获得满足感(p <0.001)的参与者,其专业性得分在统计学上明显更高。结论尽管参与调查的专业群体不同,但卫生工作者和社会工作者之间合作的专业性非常一致且很强。各组织应进一步提高工作满意度,增加参与共同伦理反思的机会。未来的研究应调查组织结构和领导力是否支持专业团体之间合作中这种执行良好的专业精神,以及工作者是否认可这些。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Professionalism in Collaboration between Health and Social Care Workers: A Survey to Members of the Finnish Trade Unions

Background. Professionalism in collaboration means working based on competencies and ethics, showing accountability and respect in communication and care by each professional group. It is required to ensure seamless, integrated, and quality of care for patients. Previous research has focused on professionalism among single professional groups; little is known about how ethics of professionalism appear in collaboration between different professional groups. Our aim was to fill the gap in this knowledge. The objectives of the study were how health and social care workers evaluated professionalism in collaboration, how professionalism was associated with the various professional groups, and how it was related to the personal characteristics of the workers. Methods. A cross-sectional study with an online survey was conducted in collaboration with 15 professional trade unions in Finland. The 26-item Interprofessional Professionalism Assessment questionnaire was used. The R program, version 4.0.2, was used for advanced descriptive and statistical methods. Results. Together, 1,769 trade union members participated in the study, representing eight professional groups and students from care, rehabilitation, and social services. The mean professionalism score was 4.20 ± 0.70 out of 5, suggesting excellent professionalism in collaboration. Care assistants, childcare and youth workers, and nurses scored professionalism statistically significantly higher than social workers (p < 0.001). Participants who experienced mutual ethical reflections at work (p < 0.001), received organizational support for ethical practice (p < 0.01), and experienced satisfaction at work (p < 0.001) scored professionalism statistically significantly higher. Conclusions. Professionalism in collaboration between health and social workers was very consistent and strong, despite the fact that different professional groups participated in the survey. Organizations should further work satisfaction and opportunities to participate in shared ethical reflection. Future studies should investigate organizational structures and leadership that support this kind of well-executed professionalism in collaboration between professional groups and if workers recognize these.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信