被禁止和被放逐:多伦多的营地驱逐、公共空间和永久性流离失所问题

IF 3.6 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Antipode Pub Date : 2024-02-19 DOI:10.1111/anti.13030
Farida Rady, Luisa Sotomayor
{"title":"被禁止和被放逐:多伦多的营地驱逐、公共空间和永久性流离失所问题","authors":"Farida Rady,&nbsp;Luisa Sotomayor","doi":"10.1111/anti.13030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Despite Toronto's motto of diversity and inclusion, the municipality has recently mobilised exclusionary spatio-legal tools against unhoused populations using claims to law and order. This article examines one such case of legal action, its precedents, and its constitutive effects on urban citizenship and governance. In 2021, amidst a homelessness crisis aggravated by COVID-19, Toronto police executed violent raids against encampment residents in three public parks. In response to the public relations backlash, the municipality changed course, issuing suspension notices to encampment leaders that barred them from public spaces and services. The suspension notice, while unenforceable, allows municipal administrators to exclude those whose conduct allegedly disturbs the quiet enjoyment of property from public space. Building on critical planning and socio-legal debates on propertied urban citizenship, we use legal research and semi-structured interviews to identify how these arbitrary yet legal tools exacerbate permanent displaceability, banishment, and colonial modes of governance.</p>","PeriodicalId":8241,"journal":{"name":"Antipode","volume":"56 5","pages":"1830-1856"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barred and Banished: Encampment Evictions, Public Space, and Permanent Displaceability in Toronto\",\"authors\":\"Farida Rady,&nbsp;Luisa Sotomayor\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/anti.13030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Despite Toronto's motto of diversity and inclusion, the municipality has recently mobilised exclusionary spatio-legal tools against unhoused populations using claims to law and order. This article examines one such case of legal action, its precedents, and its constitutive effects on urban citizenship and governance. In 2021, amidst a homelessness crisis aggravated by COVID-19, Toronto police executed violent raids against encampment residents in three public parks. In response to the public relations backlash, the municipality changed course, issuing suspension notices to encampment leaders that barred them from public spaces and services. The suspension notice, while unenforceable, allows municipal administrators to exclude those whose conduct allegedly disturbs the quiet enjoyment of property from public space. Building on critical planning and socio-legal debates on propertied urban citizenship, we use legal research and semi-structured interviews to identify how these arbitrary yet legal tools exacerbate permanent displaceability, banishment, and colonial modes of governance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Antipode\",\"volume\":\"56 5\",\"pages\":\"1830-1856\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Antipode\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/anti.13030\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antipode","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/anti.13030","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管多伦多的座右铭是多样性和包容性,但市政府最近却以法律和秩序为由,对无住房人口采取了排斥性的空间法律手段。本文探讨了此类法律行动的一个案例、其先例及其对城市公民身份和治理的构成性影响。2021 年,在因 COVID-19 而加剧的无家可归者危机中,多伦多警方对三个公共公园中的露营者实施了暴力袭击。为了应对公共关系方面的反弹,市政府改变了方针,向露营地的领导者发出了中止通知,禁止他们进入公共场所和使用公共服务。暂停通知虽然无法执行,但却允许市政管理人员将那些据称其行为扰乱了公共空间财产的安静享受的人排除在外。在关于有产权城市公民身份的重要规划和社会法律辩论的基础上,我们利用法律研究和半结构式访谈来确定这些武断但合法的工具如何加剧了永久性的流离失所、放逐和殖民治理模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Barred and Banished: Encampment Evictions, Public Space, and Permanent Displaceability in Toronto

Despite Toronto's motto of diversity and inclusion, the municipality has recently mobilised exclusionary spatio-legal tools against unhoused populations using claims to law and order. This article examines one such case of legal action, its precedents, and its constitutive effects on urban citizenship and governance. In 2021, amidst a homelessness crisis aggravated by COVID-19, Toronto police executed violent raids against encampment residents in three public parks. In response to the public relations backlash, the municipality changed course, issuing suspension notices to encampment leaders that barred them from public spaces and services. The suspension notice, while unenforceable, allows municipal administrators to exclude those whose conduct allegedly disturbs the quiet enjoyment of property from public space. Building on critical planning and socio-legal debates on propertied urban citizenship, we use legal research and semi-structured interviews to identify how these arbitrary yet legal tools exacerbate permanent displaceability, banishment, and colonial modes of governance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Antipode
Antipode GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
111
期刊介绍: Antipode has published dissenting scholarship that explores and utilizes key geographical ideas like space, scale, place, borders and landscape. It aims to challenge dominant and orthodox views of the world through debate, scholarship and politically-committed research, creating new spaces and envisioning new futures. Antipode welcomes the infusion of new ideas and the shaking up of old positions, without being committed to just one view of radical analysis or politics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信