明智选择模拟器:自动驾驶开源模拟器评述

IF 14 1区 工程技术 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Yueyuan Li;Wei Yuan;Songan Zhang;Weihao Yan;Qiyuan Shen;Chunxiang Wang;Ming Yang
{"title":"明智选择模拟器:自动驾驶开源模拟器评述","authors":"Yueyuan Li;Wei Yuan;Songan Zhang;Weihao Yan;Qiyuan Shen;Chunxiang Wang;Ming Yang","doi":"10.1109/TIV.2024.3374044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Simulators play a crucial role in autonomous driving, offering significant time, cost, and labor savings. Over the past few years, the number of simulators for autonomous driving has grown substantially. However, there is a growing concern about the validity of algorithms developed and evaluated in simulators, indicating a need for a thorough analysis of the development status of the simulators. To address existing gaps in research, this paper undertakes a comprehensive review of the history of simulators, proposes a utility-based taxonomy, and investigates the critical issues within open-source simulators. Analysis of the past thirty years' development trajectory reveals a trend characterized by an increase in open-source simulators and an expansion of their functionality scope. The categorization of simulators based on feature functionalities delineates five primary classes: traffic flow, sensory data, driving policy, vehicle dynamics, and comprehensive simulators. Furthermore, the paper identifies critical unresolved issues in open-source simulators, including concerns regarding the fidelity of sensory data, representation of traffic scenarios, and accuracy in vehicle dynamics simulation, all of which have the potential to undermine experimental confidence. Additionally, challenges in data format inconsistency, labor-intensive map construction processes, sluggish step updating, and insufficient support for Hardware-In-the-Loop testing are discussed as hindrances to experimental efficiency. In light of these findings, the survey furnishes task-oriented recommendations to aid in the selection of simulators, taking into account factors such as accessibility, maintenance status, and quality, while highlighting the inherent limitations of existing open-source simulators in validating algorithms and facilitating real-world experimentation.","PeriodicalId":36532,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles","volume":"9 5","pages":"4861-4876"},"PeriodicalIF":14.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Choose Your Simulator Wisely: A Review on Open-Source Simulators for Autonomous Driving\",\"authors\":\"Yueyuan Li;Wei Yuan;Songan Zhang;Weihao Yan;Qiyuan Shen;Chunxiang Wang;Ming Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TIV.2024.3374044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Simulators play a crucial role in autonomous driving, offering significant time, cost, and labor savings. Over the past few years, the number of simulators for autonomous driving has grown substantially. However, there is a growing concern about the validity of algorithms developed and evaluated in simulators, indicating a need for a thorough analysis of the development status of the simulators. To address existing gaps in research, this paper undertakes a comprehensive review of the history of simulators, proposes a utility-based taxonomy, and investigates the critical issues within open-source simulators. Analysis of the past thirty years' development trajectory reveals a trend characterized by an increase in open-source simulators and an expansion of their functionality scope. The categorization of simulators based on feature functionalities delineates five primary classes: traffic flow, sensory data, driving policy, vehicle dynamics, and comprehensive simulators. Furthermore, the paper identifies critical unresolved issues in open-source simulators, including concerns regarding the fidelity of sensory data, representation of traffic scenarios, and accuracy in vehicle dynamics simulation, all of which have the potential to undermine experimental confidence. Additionally, challenges in data format inconsistency, labor-intensive map construction processes, sluggish step updating, and insufficient support for Hardware-In-the-Loop testing are discussed as hindrances to experimental efficiency. In light of these findings, the survey furnishes task-oriented recommendations to aid in the selection of simulators, taking into account factors such as accessibility, maintenance status, and quality, while highlighting the inherent limitations of existing open-source simulators in validating algorithms and facilitating real-world experimentation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36532,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles\",\"volume\":\"9 5\",\"pages\":\"4861-4876\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":14.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10461065/\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10461065/","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

模拟器在自动驾驶中发挥着至关重要的作用,可大大节省时间、成本和人力。在过去几年中,自动驾驶模拟器的数量大幅增加。然而,人们越来越关注在模拟器中开发和评估的算法的有效性,这表明有必要对模拟器的开发状况进行全面分析。针对现有的研究空白,本文对模拟器的历史进行了全面回顾,提出了基于效用的分类法,并对开源模拟器中的关键问题进行了研究。对过去三十年发展轨迹的分析表明,开源模拟器呈现出不断增加、功能范围不断扩大的趋势。根据特征功能对模拟器进行分类,划分出五个主要类别:交通流、感官数据、驾驶政策、车辆动力学和综合模拟器。此外,论文还指出了开源模拟器中尚未解决的关键问题,包括感官数据的保真度、交通场景的表现力以及车辆动态模拟的准确性,所有这些问题都有可能削弱实验的可信度。此外,数据格式不一致、地图构建过程耗费大量人力、步骤更新缓慢以及对硬件在环测试的支持不足等挑战也被视为实验效率的障碍。鉴于这些发现,调查提供了以任务为导向的建议,以帮助选择模拟器,同时考虑到可访问性、维护状态和质量等因素,并强调了现有开源模拟器在验证算法和促进真实世界实验方面的固有局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Choose Your Simulator Wisely: A Review on Open-Source Simulators for Autonomous Driving
Simulators play a crucial role in autonomous driving, offering significant time, cost, and labor savings. Over the past few years, the number of simulators for autonomous driving has grown substantially. However, there is a growing concern about the validity of algorithms developed and evaluated in simulators, indicating a need for a thorough analysis of the development status of the simulators. To address existing gaps in research, this paper undertakes a comprehensive review of the history of simulators, proposes a utility-based taxonomy, and investigates the critical issues within open-source simulators. Analysis of the past thirty years' development trajectory reveals a trend characterized by an increase in open-source simulators and an expansion of their functionality scope. The categorization of simulators based on feature functionalities delineates five primary classes: traffic flow, sensory data, driving policy, vehicle dynamics, and comprehensive simulators. Furthermore, the paper identifies critical unresolved issues in open-source simulators, including concerns regarding the fidelity of sensory data, representation of traffic scenarios, and accuracy in vehicle dynamics simulation, all of which have the potential to undermine experimental confidence. Additionally, challenges in data format inconsistency, labor-intensive map construction processes, sluggish step updating, and insufficient support for Hardware-In-the-Loop testing are discussed as hindrances to experimental efficiency. In light of these findings, the survey furnishes task-oriented recommendations to aid in the selection of simulators, taking into account factors such as accessibility, maintenance status, and quality, while highlighting the inherent limitations of existing open-source simulators in validating algorithms and facilitating real-world experimentation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles
IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles Mathematics-Control and Optimization
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
13.40%
发文量
177
期刊介绍: The IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles (T-IV) is a premier platform for publishing peer-reviewed articles that present innovative research concepts, application results, significant theoretical findings, and application case studies in the field of intelligent vehicles. With a particular emphasis on automated vehicles within roadway environments, T-IV aims to raise awareness of pressing research and application challenges. Our focus is on providing critical information to the intelligent vehicle community, serving as a dissemination vehicle for IEEE ITS Society members and others interested in learning about the state-of-the-art developments and progress in research and applications related to intelligent vehicles. Join us in advancing knowledge and innovation in this dynamic field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信