评估机器学习技术,通过瞳孔光反射分析加强青光眼筛查

IF 2.3 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS
Array Pub Date : 2024-08-02 DOI:10.1016/j.array.2024.100359
Hedenir Monteiro Pinheiro , Eduardo Nery Rossi Camilo , Augusto Paranhos Junior , Afonso Ueslei Fonseca , Gustavo Teodoro Laureano , Ronaldo Martins da Costa
{"title":"评估机器学习技术,通过瞳孔光反射分析加强青光眼筛查","authors":"Hedenir Monteiro Pinheiro ,&nbsp;Eduardo Nery Rossi Camilo ,&nbsp;Augusto Paranhos Junior ,&nbsp;Afonso Ueslei Fonseca ,&nbsp;Gustavo Teodoro Laureano ,&nbsp;Ronaldo Martins da Costa","doi":"10.1016/j.array.2024.100359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Glaucoma is a leading cause of irreversible visual field degradation, significantly impacting ocular health. Timely identification and diagnosis of this condition are critical to prevent vision loss. A range of diagnostic techniques is employed to achieve this, from traditional methods reliant on expert interpretation to modern, fully computerized diagnostic approaches. The integration of computerized systems designed for the early detection and classification of clinical indicators of glaucoma holds immense potential to enhance the accuracy of disease diagnosis. Pupillary Light Reflex (PLR) analysis emerges as a promising avenue for glaucoma screening, mainly due to its cost-effectiveness compared to exams such as Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT), Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA), and fundoscopic examinations. The noninvasive nature of PLR testing obviates the need for disposable components and agents for pupil dilation. This facilitates multiple successive administrations of the test and enables the possibility of remote execution. This study aimed to improve the automated diagnosis of glaucoma using PLR data, conducting an extensive comparative analysis incorporating neural networks and machine learning techniques. It also compared the performance of different data processing methods, including filtering techniques, feature extraction, data balancing, feature selection, and their effects on classification. The findings offer insights and guidelines for future methodologies in glaucoma screening utilizing pupillary light response signals.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8417,"journal":{"name":"Array","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 100359"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590005624000250/pdfft?md5=17199a115ebd5deefc6427889a273079&pid=1-s2.0-S2590005624000250-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating machine learning techniques for enhanced glaucoma screening through Pupillary Light Reflex analysis\",\"authors\":\"Hedenir Monteiro Pinheiro ,&nbsp;Eduardo Nery Rossi Camilo ,&nbsp;Augusto Paranhos Junior ,&nbsp;Afonso Ueslei Fonseca ,&nbsp;Gustavo Teodoro Laureano ,&nbsp;Ronaldo Martins da Costa\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.array.2024.100359\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Glaucoma is a leading cause of irreversible visual field degradation, significantly impacting ocular health. Timely identification and diagnosis of this condition are critical to prevent vision loss. A range of diagnostic techniques is employed to achieve this, from traditional methods reliant on expert interpretation to modern, fully computerized diagnostic approaches. The integration of computerized systems designed for the early detection and classification of clinical indicators of glaucoma holds immense potential to enhance the accuracy of disease diagnosis. Pupillary Light Reflex (PLR) analysis emerges as a promising avenue for glaucoma screening, mainly due to its cost-effectiveness compared to exams such as Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT), Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA), and fundoscopic examinations. The noninvasive nature of PLR testing obviates the need for disposable components and agents for pupil dilation. This facilitates multiple successive administrations of the test and enables the possibility of remote execution. This study aimed to improve the automated diagnosis of glaucoma using PLR data, conducting an extensive comparative analysis incorporating neural networks and machine learning techniques. It also compared the performance of different data processing methods, including filtering techniques, feature extraction, data balancing, feature selection, and their effects on classification. The findings offer insights and guidelines for future methodologies in glaucoma screening utilizing pupillary light response signals.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8417,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Array\",\"volume\":\"23 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100359\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590005624000250/pdfft?md5=17199a115ebd5deefc6427889a273079&pid=1-s2.0-S2590005624000250-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Array\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590005624000250\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Array","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590005624000250","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

青光眼是造成不可逆转的视野退化的主要原因,严重影响眼部健康。及时发现和诊断这种疾病对于防止视力丧失至关重要。为此,我们采用了一系列诊断技术,从依赖专家解读的传统方法到完全计算机化的现代诊断方法。整合计算机化系统,用于早期检测和分类青光眼的临床指标,在提高疾病诊断的准确性方面具有巨大的潜力。瞳孔光反射(PLR)分析是一种很有前景的青光眼筛查方法,这主要是因为与光学相干断层扫描(OCT)、汉弗莱视野分析仪(HFA)和眼底镜检查等检查方法相比,PLR分析具有成本效益。PLR 测试的非侵入性无需使用一次性组件和散瞳剂。这为连续多次进行测试提供了便利,并使远程执行测试成为可能。这项研究旨在利用 PLR 数据改进青光眼的自动诊断,结合神经网络和机器学习技术进行了广泛的比较分析。研究还比较了不同数据处理方法的性能,包括过滤技术、特征提取、数据平衡、特征选择及其对分类的影响。研究结果为今后利用瞳孔光反应信号筛查青光眼的方法提供了启示和指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Evaluating machine learning techniques for enhanced glaucoma screening through Pupillary Light Reflex analysis

Evaluating machine learning techniques for enhanced glaucoma screening through Pupillary Light Reflex analysis

Glaucoma is a leading cause of irreversible visual field degradation, significantly impacting ocular health. Timely identification and diagnosis of this condition are critical to prevent vision loss. A range of diagnostic techniques is employed to achieve this, from traditional methods reliant on expert interpretation to modern, fully computerized diagnostic approaches. The integration of computerized systems designed for the early detection and classification of clinical indicators of glaucoma holds immense potential to enhance the accuracy of disease diagnosis. Pupillary Light Reflex (PLR) analysis emerges as a promising avenue for glaucoma screening, mainly due to its cost-effectiveness compared to exams such as Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT), Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA), and fundoscopic examinations. The noninvasive nature of PLR testing obviates the need for disposable components and agents for pupil dilation. This facilitates multiple successive administrations of the test and enables the possibility of remote execution. This study aimed to improve the automated diagnosis of glaucoma using PLR data, conducting an extensive comparative analysis incorporating neural networks and machine learning techniques. It also compared the performance of different data processing methods, including filtering techniques, feature extraction, data balancing, feature selection, and their effects on classification. The findings offer insights and guidelines for future methodologies in glaucoma screening utilizing pupillary light response signals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Array
Array Computer Science-General Computer Science
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
93
审稿时长
45 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信