R. Meng , A.K. Dowdell , A. Vita , D. Hanes , B. Bapat , S.-C. Chang , L. Harold , M. Schmidt , C. Wong , H. Poon , B. Schroeder , R. Weerasinghe , R. Sanborn , R. Leidner , W.J. Urba , C. Bifulco , B. Piening
{"title":"美国一家大型医疗保健系统利用综合基因组图谱测试对晚期非小细胞肺癌患者的临床影响","authors":"R. Meng , A.K. Dowdell , A. Vita , D. Hanes , B. Bapat , S.-C. Chang , L. Harold , M. Schmidt , C. Wong , H. Poon , B. Schroeder , R. Weerasinghe , R. Sanborn , R. Leidner , W.J. Urba , C. Bifulco , B. Piening","doi":"10.1016/j.esmorw.2024.100057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>New breakthroughs in precision therapies are transforming cancer care for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). To this effect, comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) has emerged as a streamlined workflow to test for all relevant tumor biomarkers within a single assay. Despite this, there are still significant gaps in access to CGP testing, with many patients only tested for a subset of biomarkers or not tested at all.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>We assessed the clinical impact of wide deployment of an in-house CGP assay at a large health care system in the United States by analyzing a cohort of advanced-stage NSCLC patients who received CGP testing and a retrospective cohort that was tested with a prior-generation 50-gene assay (small panel).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Seventy-seven percent of CGP-tested NSCLC patients had one or more tumor biomarkers that were actionable for a precision therapy compared to 63% of small panel-tested patients. CGP-tested patients with an actionable biomarker received appropriate precision therapies at a higher rate than small panel-tested patients (64% versus 50%, <em>P</em> < 0.001), and there were marked improvements in survival outcomes for patients tested with CGP [median overall survival (OS) 15.7 months versus 7 months, <em>P</em> < 0.0001].</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>These data demonstrate clear precision therapy selection and patient OS benefits from universal access to CGP testing. Despite this, not all patients with an actionable biomarker received a precision therapy, suggesting that there are still gaps between access to CGP testing and access to precision therapies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100491,"journal":{"name":"ESMO Real World Data and Digital Oncology","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100057"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949820124000353/pdfft?md5=d0e01e23ae951e134ce56aabf66c771f&pid=1-s2.0-S2949820124000353-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical impact for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients tested using comprehensive genomic profiling at a large USA health care system\",\"authors\":\"R. Meng , A.K. Dowdell , A. Vita , D. Hanes , B. Bapat , S.-C. Chang , L. Harold , M. Schmidt , C. Wong , H. Poon , B. Schroeder , R. Weerasinghe , R. Sanborn , R. Leidner , W.J. Urba , C. Bifulco , B. Piening\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.esmorw.2024.100057\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>New breakthroughs in precision therapies are transforming cancer care for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). To this effect, comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) has emerged as a streamlined workflow to test for all relevant tumor biomarkers within a single assay. Despite this, there are still significant gaps in access to CGP testing, with many patients only tested for a subset of biomarkers or not tested at all.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>We assessed the clinical impact of wide deployment of an in-house CGP assay at a large health care system in the United States by analyzing a cohort of advanced-stage NSCLC patients who received CGP testing and a retrospective cohort that was tested with a prior-generation 50-gene assay (small panel).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Seventy-seven percent of CGP-tested NSCLC patients had one or more tumor biomarkers that were actionable for a precision therapy compared to 63% of small panel-tested patients. CGP-tested patients with an actionable biomarker received appropriate precision therapies at a higher rate than small panel-tested patients (64% versus 50%, <em>P</em> < 0.001), and there were marked improvements in survival outcomes for patients tested with CGP [median overall survival (OS) 15.7 months versus 7 months, <em>P</em> < 0.0001].</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>These data demonstrate clear precision therapy selection and patient OS benefits from universal access to CGP testing. Despite this, not all patients with an actionable biomarker received a precision therapy, suggesting that there are still gaps between access to CGP testing and access to precision therapies.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100491,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ESMO Real World Data and Digital Oncology\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100057\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949820124000353/pdfft?md5=d0e01e23ae951e134ce56aabf66c771f&pid=1-s2.0-S2949820124000353-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ESMO Real World Data and Digital Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949820124000353\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ESMO Real World Data and Digital Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949820124000353","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Clinical impact for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients tested using comprehensive genomic profiling at a large USA health care system
Background
New breakthroughs in precision therapies are transforming cancer care for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). To this effect, comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) has emerged as a streamlined workflow to test for all relevant tumor biomarkers within a single assay. Despite this, there are still significant gaps in access to CGP testing, with many patients only tested for a subset of biomarkers or not tested at all.
Materials and methods
We assessed the clinical impact of wide deployment of an in-house CGP assay at a large health care system in the United States by analyzing a cohort of advanced-stage NSCLC patients who received CGP testing and a retrospective cohort that was tested with a prior-generation 50-gene assay (small panel).
Results
Seventy-seven percent of CGP-tested NSCLC patients had one or more tumor biomarkers that were actionable for a precision therapy compared to 63% of small panel-tested patients. CGP-tested patients with an actionable biomarker received appropriate precision therapies at a higher rate than small panel-tested patients (64% versus 50%, P < 0.001), and there were marked improvements in survival outcomes for patients tested with CGP [median overall survival (OS) 15.7 months versus 7 months, P < 0.0001].
Conclusions
These data demonstrate clear precision therapy selection and patient OS benefits from universal access to CGP testing. Despite this, not all patients with an actionable biomarker received a precision therapy, suggesting that there are still gaps between access to CGP testing and access to precision therapies.