{"title":"机器人是否挤走了农民工?来自中国城市的证据","authors":"Jiantao Zhou , Eddie Chi-Man Hui , Huiwen Peng","doi":"10.1016/j.habitatint.2024.103154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The heated debate on automation versus labor pulls at the heartstrings of many in both academia and industry, as automation can trigger dramatic adjustments in the urban labor market. Yet, little is known about how migrant workers respond to such technological advances. To contribute to this debate, this paper empirically investigates the effects of automation (proxied by the exposure degree of industrial robots) on the settlement intention of migrant workers in urban China. Employing data from the <em>China Migrants Dynamic Survey</em> (CMDS) 2014–2017, our results reveal that cities with greater exposure to industrial robots are more likely to attract migrant workers to settle. Yet, the promotion of settlement intentions is more pronounced for migrant workers at the high and low tails of the skill distribution, leading to a U-shaped selection. Further analyses confirm that this nonlinearity is mainly due to the displacement of routine-intensive occupations, the reinstatement of high-skilled machine-complementing occupations, and the indirect boom in service-related occupations at all skill levels. In addition to economic incentives as the decisive impact channel, mechanism analyses found that the resulting labor market adjustment simultaneously enhances the social integration of migrant workers, acting as a secondary impact channel on the willingness of migrant workers to settle. Our findings raise concerns about the polarization of skills and wages among migrant workers despite their general benefit from automation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48376,"journal":{"name":"Habitat International","volume":"152 ","pages":"Article 103154"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are robots crowding out migrant workers? Evidence from urban China\",\"authors\":\"Jiantao Zhou , Eddie Chi-Man Hui , Huiwen Peng\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.habitatint.2024.103154\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The heated debate on automation versus labor pulls at the heartstrings of many in both academia and industry, as automation can trigger dramatic adjustments in the urban labor market. Yet, little is known about how migrant workers respond to such technological advances. To contribute to this debate, this paper empirically investigates the effects of automation (proxied by the exposure degree of industrial robots) on the settlement intention of migrant workers in urban China. Employing data from the <em>China Migrants Dynamic Survey</em> (CMDS) 2014–2017, our results reveal that cities with greater exposure to industrial robots are more likely to attract migrant workers to settle. Yet, the promotion of settlement intentions is more pronounced for migrant workers at the high and low tails of the skill distribution, leading to a U-shaped selection. Further analyses confirm that this nonlinearity is mainly due to the displacement of routine-intensive occupations, the reinstatement of high-skilled machine-complementing occupations, and the indirect boom in service-related occupations at all skill levels. In addition to economic incentives as the decisive impact channel, mechanism analyses found that the resulting labor market adjustment simultaneously enhances the social integration of migrant workers, acting as a secondary impact channel on the willingness of migrant workers to settle. Our findings raise concerns about the polarization of skills and wages among migrant workers despite their general benefit from automation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48376,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Habitat International\",\"volume\":\"152 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103154\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Habitat International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0197397524001541\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Habitat International","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0197397524001541","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Are robots crowding out migrant workers? Evidence from urban China
The heated debate on automation versus labor pulls at the heartstrings of many in both academia and industry, as automation can trigger dramatic adjustments in the urban labor market. Yet, little is known about how migrant workers respond to such technological advances. To contribute to this debate, this paper empirically investigates the effects of automation (proxied by the exposure degree of industrial robots) on the settlement intention of migrant workers in urban China. Employing data from the China Migrants Dynamic Survey (CMDS) 2014–2017, our results reveal that cities with greater exposure to industrial robots are more likely to attract migrant workers to settle. Yet, the promotion of settlement intentions is more pronounced for migrant workers at the high and low tails of the skill distribution, leading to a U-shaped selection. Further analyses confirm that this nonlinearity is mainly due to the displacement of routine-intensive occupations, the reinstatement of high-skilled machine-complementing occupations, and the indirect boom in service-related occupations at all skill levels. In addition to economic incentives as the decisive impact channel, mechanism analyses found that the resulting labor market adjustment simultaneously enhances the social integration of migrant workers, acting as a secondary impact channel on the willingness of migrant workers to settle. Our findings raise concerns about the polarization of skills and wages among migrant workers despite their general benefit from automation.
期刊介绍:
Habitat International is dedicated to the study of urban and rural human settlements: their planning, design, production and management. Its main focus is on urbanisation in its broadest sense in the developing world. However, increasingly the interrelationships and linkages between cities and towns in the developing and developed worlds are becoming apparent and solutions to the problems that result are urgently required. The economic, social, technological and political systems of the world are intertwined and changes in one region almost always affect other regions.