了解驾驶员对自动驾驶过程中使用驾驶员监控系统的看法:焦点小组定性研究的结果

IF 3.5 2区 工程技术 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Rory Coyne , Michelle Hanlon , Alan F Smeaton , Peter Corcoran , Jane C Walsh
{"title":"了解驾驶员对自动驾驶过程中使用驾驶员监控系统的看法:焦点小组定性研究的结果","authors":"Rory Coyne ,&nbsp;Michelle Hanlon ,&nbsp;Alan F Smeaton ,&nbsp;Peter Corcoran ,&nbsp;Jane C Walsh","doi":"10.1016/j.trf.2024.07.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The ability to measure psychological states such as fatigue will become increasingly important with the introduction of automated driving systems (ADS) to everyday driving. Driver monitoring systems (DMS), which will soon be a required feature in all new vehicles, will be responsible for assessing the driver’s mental state in real-time. This will help to maximise the safety and social benefits of ADS. However, little is known about drivers’ perceptions of DMS. This qualitative focus group study used a reflexive thematic analysis approach to understand drivers’ perspectives on the use of DMS during automated driving. Seventeen drivers with no prior experience of ADS or DMS were interviewed across three focus group sessions and were shown a video outlining some of the capabilities of both systems. A semi-structured interview guide was used to gather qualitative data concerning drivers’ perceptions of the prospect of driver monitoring within automated driving and the expectations that they have. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to develop five themes. The findings show that drivers have more favourable attitudes towards DMS than ADS, due to an expectation that the latter will require a greater sacrifice of the driver’s control. Nonetheless, participants were sceptical of the reliability, security and privacy of driver monitoring, and expressed that it could detract from the enjoyment derived from driving. Participants were also concerned regarding the potential for driver data to be sold to third parties and used against them in various ways. Overall, drivers are sceptical of the value of driver monitoring and ADS and perceive them as separate entities as opposed to two systems working in partnership. This highlights an emerging challenge for researchers and system manufacturers, which will need be addressed in order to fully realise the individual and societal benefits of these new forms of technology.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48355,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847824001840/pdfft?md5=b7154a376be040556bc0656d31ed9adc&pid=1-s2.0-S1369847824001840-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding drivers’ perspectives on the use of driver monitoring systems during automated driving: Findings from a qualitative focus group study\",\"authors\":\"Rory Coyne ,&nbsp;Michelle Hanlon ,&nbsp;Alan F Smeaton ,&nbsp;Peter Corcoran ,&nbsp;Jane C Walsh\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.trf.2024.07.015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The ability to measure psychological states such as fatigue will become increasingly important with the introduction of automated driving systems (ADS) to everyday driving. Driver monitoring systems (DMS), which will soon be a required feature in all new vehicles, will be responsible for assessing the driver’s mental state in real-time. This will help to maximise the safety and social benefits of ADS. However, little is known about drivers’ perceptions of DMS. This qualitative focus group study used a reflexive thematic analysis approach to understand drivers’ perspectives on the use of DMS during automated driving. Seventeen drivers with no prior experience of ADS or DMS were interviewed across three focus group sessions and were shown a video outlining some of the capabilities of both systems. A semi-structured interview guide was used to gather qualitative data concerning drivers’ perceptions of the prospect of driver monitoring within automated driving and the expectations that they have. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to develop five themes. The findings show that drivers have more favourable attitudes towards DMS than ADS, due to an expectation that the latter will require a greater sacrifice of the driver’s control. Nonetheless, participants were sceptical of the reliability, security and privacy of driver monitoring, and expressed that it could detract from the enjoyment derived from driving. Participants were also concerned regarding the potential for driver data to be sold to third parties and used against them in various ways. Overall, drivers are sceptical of the value of driver monitoring and ADS and perceive them as separate entities as opposed to two systems working in partnership. This highlights an emerging challenge for researchers and system manufacturers, which will need be addressed in order to fully realise the individual and societal benefits of these new forms of technology.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847824001840/pdfft?md5=b7154a376be040556bc0656d31ed9adc&pid=1-s2.0-S1369847824001840-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847824001840\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847824001840","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着自动驾驶系统(ADS)被引入日常驾驶,测量疲劳等心理状态的能力将变得越来越重要。驾驶员监控系统(DMS)很快将成为所有新车的必备功能,它将负责实时评估驾驶员的心理状态。这将有助于最大限度地发挥自动驾驶辅助系统的安全和社会效益。然而,人们对驾驶员对 DMS 的看法知之甚少。这项定性焦点小组研究采用了反思性主题分析方法,以了解驾驶员对自动驾驶过程中使用 DMS 的看法。17 名驾驶员此前从未接触过 ADS 或 DMS,他们在三次焦点小组会议中接受了访谈,并观看了概述这两种系统部分功能的视频。采用半结构化访谈指南收集定性数据,了解驾驶员对自动驾驶中驾驶员监控前景的看法和期望。采用反思性主题分析法确定了五个主题。调查结果显示,与自动驾驶辅助系统相比,驾驶员对自动驾驶辅助系统的态度更为积极,因为他们认为自动驾驶辅助系统需要驾驶员做出更大的控制牺牲。然而,参与者对驾驶员监控的可靠性、安全性和隐私性持怀疑态度,并表示这可能会影响驾驶乐趣。与会者还担心驾驶员数据可能会被出售给第三方,并以各种方式被用来对付他们。总体而言,驾驶员对驾驶员监控和自动驾驶辅助系统的价值持怀疑态度,认为它们是两个独立的实体,而不是两个合作的系统。这凸显了研究人员和系统制造商面临的新挑战,要想充分实现这些新技术对个人和社会的益处,就必须解决这一问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Understanding drivers’ perspectives on the use of driver monitoring systems during automated driving: Findings from a qualitative focus group study

The ability to measure psychological states such as fatigue will become increasingly important with the introduction of automated driving systems (ADS) to everyday driving. Driver monitoring systems (DMS), which will soon be a required feature in all new vehicles, will be responsible for assessing the driver’s mental state in real-time. This will help to maximise the safety and social benefits of ADS. However, little is known about drivers’ perceptions of DMS. This qualitative focus group study used a reflexive thematic analysis approach to understand drivers’ perspectives on the use of DMS during automated driving. Seventeen drivers with no prior experience of ADS or DMS were interviewed across three focus group sessions and were shown a video outlining some of the capabilities of both systems. A semi-structured interview guide was used to gather qualitative data concerning drivers’ perceptions of the prospect of driver monitoring within automated driving and the expectations that they have. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to develop five themes. The findings show that drivers have more favourable attitudes towards DMS than ADS, due to an expectation that the latter will require a greater sacrifice of the driver’s control. Nonetheless, participants were sceptical of the reliability, security and privacy of driver monitoring, and expressed that it could detract from the enjoyment derived from driving. Participants were also concerned regarding the potential for driver data to be sold to third parties and used against them in various ways. Overall, drivers are sceptical of the value of driver monitoring and ADS and perceive them as separate entities as opposed to two systems working in partnership. This highlights an emerging challenge for researchers and system manufacturers, which will need be addressed in order to fully realise the individual and societal benefits of these new forms of technology.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
14.60%
发文量
239
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour focuses on the behavioural and psychological aspects of traffic and transport. The aim of the journal is to enhance theory development, improve the quality of empirical studies and to stimulate the application of research findings in practice. TRF provides a focus and a means of communication for the considerable amount of research activities that are now being carried out in this field. The journal provides a forum for transportation researchers, psychologists, ergonomists, engineers and policy-makers with an interest in traffic and transport psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信