尼泊尔社区林业实践中持续存在排斥妇女的现象

IF 3.4 2区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Srijana Baral , Krishna K. Shrestha , Sarada Tiwari
{"title":"尼泊尔社区林业实践中持续存在排斥妇女的现象","authors":"Srijana Baral ,&nbsp;Krishna K. Shrestha ,&nbsp;Sarada Tiwari","doi":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2024.104092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Women’s knowledge, roles, and responsibilities are increasingly recognised in natural resource management (NRM). A raft of affirmative action policies in the forestry sector has amplified the importance of women in the conservation, management, and use of natural resources. Yet, women are often excluded in NRM decision-making practices. This paper investigates the persistence of the exclusion of women in Nepal’s community forestry practices. We focus on the forces of exclusion of women in community forestry decision-making in the context of changes in politics, institutional hierarchies, markets, and knowledge domains. We draw on an innovative research method − <em>Planning Studio</em>, bringing together key ideas from critical action research from seven case study sites, five years of participant observation, 40 Key Informant Interviews (KII), 10 Focus Group Discussions (FDG) and six research workshops. Findings demonstrate that several forces of exclusion shape and sustain the persistence of women’s exclusion in Nepal’s community forestry practice. These forces include a) CFUG institutions in the new political landscape of Nepal, b) the emergent market for forest products and services, c) technical knowledge hegemony in policy, and d) cultural hegemony in which CFUG decisions are made. Women’s exclusion increases in the institutional hierarchy, from the CFUG decision-making to the state’s policymaking and adopting technocratic rules in forest management and market access. The pre-existing patriarchy shapes and excludes the aspiration of women’s agency in active engagement in community forestry. The exclusion continues and worsens if these forces are not recognised and addressed at various levels of decision-making.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12497,"journal":{"name":"Geoforum","volume":"155 ","pages":"Article 104092"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Persistence of women’s exclusion in Nepal’s community forestry practice\",\"authors\":\"Srijana Baral ,&nbsp;Krishna K. Shrestha ,&nbsp;Sarada Tiwari\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.geoforum.2024.104092\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Women’s knowledge, roles, and responsibilities are increasingly recognised in natural resource management (NRM). A raft of affirmative action policies in the forestry sector has amplified the importance of women in the conservation, management, and use of natural resources. Yet, women are often excluded in NRM decision-making practices. This paper investigates the persistence of the exclusion of women in Nepal’s community forestry practices. We focus on the forces of exclusion of women in community forestry decision-making in the context of changes in politics, institutional hierarchies, markets, and knowledge domains. We draw on an innovative research method − <em>Planning Studio</em>, bringing together key ideas from critical action research from seven case study sites, five years of participant observation, 40 Key Informant Interviews (KII), 10 Focus Group Discussions (FDG) and six research workshops. Findings demonstrate that several forces of exclusion shape and sustain the persistence of women’s exclusion in Nepal’s community forestry practice. These forces include a) CFUG institutions in the new political landscape of Nepal, b) the emergent market for forest products and services, c) technical knowledge hegemony in policy, and d) cultural hegemony in which CFUG decisions are made. Women’s exclusion increases in the institutional hierarchy, from the CFUG decision-making to the state’s policymaking and adopting technocratic rules in forest management and market access. The pre-existing patriarchy shapes and excludes the aspiration of women’s agency in active engagement in community forestry. The exclusion continues and worsens if these forces are not recognised and addressed at various levels of decision-making.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12497,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geoforum\",\"volume\":\"155 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104092\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geoforum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718524001532\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoforum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718524001532","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在自然资源管理 (NRM) 中,妇女的知识、作用和责任日益得到认可。林业部门的一系列平权行动政策提高了妇女在自然资源保护、管理和使用方面的重要性。然而,妇女往往被排除在自然资源管理决策实践之外。本文调查了尼泊尔社区林业实践中持续存在的排斥妇女现象。我们重点关注在政治、制度等级、市场和知识领域发生变化的背景下,社区林业决策中排斥妇女的力量。我们采用了一种创新的研究方法--规划工作室(Planning Studio),从七个案例研究地点、五年的参与观察、40 次关键知情人访谈(KII)、10 次焦点小组讨论(FDG)和六次研究研讨会中汇集了批判性行动研究的主要观点。研究结果表明,在尼泊尔的社区林业实践中,有几种排斥力量形成并维持着对妇女的持续排斥。这些力量包括:a) 尼泊尔新政治格局中的社区林业小组机构;b) 新出现的森林产品和服务市场;c) 政策中的技术知识霸权;d) 社区林业小组决策中的文化霸权。从 CFUG 的决策到国家的政策制定,以及在森林管理和市场准入方面采用技术官僚规则,妇女在制度层次上受到的排斥越来越大。先前存在的父权制影响并排斥了妇女积极参与社区林业的愿望。如果在各级决策中没有认识到这些力量并加以解决,这种排斥就会继续存在并加剧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Persistence of women’s exclusion in Nepal’s community forestry practice

Women’s knowledge, roles, and responsibilities are increasingly recognised in natural resource management (NRM). A raft of affirmative action policies in the forestry sector has amplified the importance of women in the conservation, management, and use of natural resources. Yet, women are often excluded in NRM decision-making practices. This paper investigates the persistence of the exclusion of women in Nepal’s community forestry practices. We focus on the forces of exclusion of women in community forestry decision-making in the context of changes in politics, institutional hierarchies, markets, and knowledge domains. We draw on an innovative research method − Planning Studio, bringing together key ideas from critical action research from seven case study sites, five years of participant observation, 40 Key Informant Interviews (KII), 10 Focus Group Discussions (FDG) and six research workshops. Findings demonstrate that several forces of exclusion shape and sustain the persistence of women’s exclusion in Nepal’s community forestry practice. These forces include a) CFUG institutions in the new political landscape of Nepal, b) the emergent market for forest products and services, c) technical knowledge hegemony in policy, and d) cultural hegemony in which CFUG decisions are made. Women’s exclusion increases in the institutional hierarchy, from the CFUG decision-making to the state’s policymaking and adopting technocratic rules in forest management and market access. The pre-existing patriarchy shapes and excludes the aspiration of women’s agency in active engagement in community forestry. The exclusion continues and worsens if these forces are not recognised and addressed at various levels of decision-making.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geoforum
Geoforum GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
201
期刊介绍: Geoforum is an international, inter-disciplinary journal, global in outlook, and integrative in approach. The broad focus of Geoforum is the organisation of economic, political, social and environmental systems through space and over time. Areas of study range from the analysis of the global political economy and environment, through national systems of regulation and governance, to urban and regional development, local economic and urban planning and resources management. The journal also includes a Critical Review section which features critical assessments of research in all the above areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信