18F-FDG-PET/CT在检测多发性风湿痛或巨细胞动脉炎患者颅外大血管炎中的作用:系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
{"title":"18F-FDG-PET/CT在检测多发性风湿痛或巨细胞动脉炎患者颅外大血管炎中的作用:系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.rce.2024.04.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Systematic review of current evidence to analyze the prevalence of extracranial large vessel vasculitis (LVV) using <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT in patients with polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) or giant cell arteritis (GCA).</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>PubMed and EMBASE were searched and the results were screened by two reviewers. Study quality was assessed using a modified version of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Heterogeneity between studies was assessed using the I<sup>2</sup> statistic and the Q test. Further subgroup analyses were performed by disease type, study quality, and <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT uptake criteria. Publication bias was assessed by funnel plot and Egger's test.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>268 publications were identified, of which 17 met the selection criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. The overall pooled prevalence of extracranial VGV by <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT was 54.5% [95% CI: 42.6% to 66.1%]. In patients with GCA the prevalence was significantly higher than in patients with PMR (60.1% vs. 41.8%, <em>P</em>= .006). Likewise, studies with a lower risk of bias reported a higher prevalence of extracranial VGV (61.1% vs. 46.9%; <em>P</em>= .010). No publication bias was observed.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The <sup>18</sup>F-FDGPET/CT test may be useful in the detection of extracranial VGV, both in patients with PMR or GCA. Such involvement is more frequent in patients with GCA, and may vary depending on the quality of the studies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21223,"journal":{"name":"Revista clinica espanola","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utilidad del 18F-FDG-PET/TC en la detección de vasculitis de gran vaso extracraneal en pacientes con polimialgia reumática o arteritis de células gigantes: revisión sistemática y metaanálisis\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rce.2024.04.016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Systematic review of current evidence to analyze the prevalence of extracranial large vessel vasculitis (LVV) using <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT in patients with polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) or giant cell arteritis (GCA).</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>PubMed and EMBASE were searched and the results were screened by two reviewers. Study quality was assessed using a modified version of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Heterogeneity between studies was assessed using the I<sup>2</sup> statistic and the Q test. Further subgroup analyses were performed by disease type, study quality, and <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT uptake criteria. Publication bias was assessed by funnel plot and Egger's test.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>268 publications were identified, of which 17 met the selection criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. The overall pooled prevalence of extracranial VGV by <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT was 54.5% [95% CI: 42.6% to 66.1%]. In patients with GCA the prevalence was significantly higher than in patients with PMR (60.1% vs. 41.8%, <em>P</em>= .006). Likewise, studies with a lower risk of bias reported a higher prevalence of extracranial VGV (61.1% vs. 46.9%; <em>P</em>= .010). No publication bias was observed.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The <sup>18</sup>F-FDGPET/CT test may be useful in the detection of extracranial VGV, both in patients with PMR or GCA. Such involvement is more frequent in patients with GCA, and may vary depending on the quality of the studies.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista clinica espanola\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista clinica espanola\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014256524001103\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista clinica espanola","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014256524001103","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的系统回顾目前的证据,利用 18F-FDG PET/CT 分析多发性风湿痛(PMR)或巨细胞动脉炎(GCA)患者颅外大血管炎(LVV)的患病率。研究质量采用修订版纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表进行评估。研究之间的异质性采用 I2 统计量和 Q 检验进行评估。根据疾病类型、研究质量和 18F-FDG PET/CT 摄取标准进行了进一步的亚组分析。通过漏斗图和 Egger 检验对发表偏倚进行了评估。结果 共发现 268 篇文献,其中 17 篇符合筛选标准,被纳入荟萃分析。通过18F-FDG PET/CT汇总的颅外VGV总患病率为54.5%[95% CI:42.6%至66.1%]。GCA患者的患病率明显高于PMR患者(60.1%对41.8%,P= .006)。同样,偏倚风险较低的研究报告了较高的颅外VGV患病率(61.1% vs. 46.9%;P= .010)。结论18F-FDGPET/CT检查可用于检测颅外VGV,无论是PMR患者还是GCA患者。这种累及在 GCA 患者中更为常见,而且可能因研究质量而异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Utilidad del 18F-FDG-PET/TC en la detección de vasculitis de gran vaso extracraneal en pacientes con polimialgia reumática o arteritis de células gigantes: revisión sistemática y metaanálisis

Objective

Systematic review of current evidence to analyze the prevalence of extracranial large vessel vasculitis (LVV) using 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) or giant cell arteritis (GCA).

Materials and methods

PubMed and EMBASE were searched and the results were screened by two reviewers. Study quality was assessed using a modified version of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Heterogeneity between studies was assessed using the I2 statistic and the Q test. Further subgroup analyses were performed by disease type, study quality, and 18F-FDG PET/CT uptake criteria. Publication bias was assessed by funnel plot and Egger's test.

Results

268 publications were identified, of which 17 met the selection criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. The overall pooled prevalence of extracranial VGV by 18F-FDG PET/CT was 54.5% [95% CI: 42.6% to 66.1%]. In patients with GCA the prevalence was significantly higher than in patients with PMR (60.1% vs. 41.8%, P= .006). Likewise, studies with a lower risk of bias reported a higher prevalence of extracranial VGV (61.1% vs. 46.9%; P= .010). No publication bias was observed.

Conclusions

The 18F-FDGPET/CT test may be useful in the detection of extracranial VGV, both in patients with PMR or GCA. Such involvement is more frequent in patients with GCA, and may vary depending on the quality of the studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista clinica espanola
Revista clinica espanola 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.90%
发文量
73
审稿时长
28 days
期刊介绍: Revista Clínica Española published its first issue in 1940 and is the body of expression of the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine (SEMI). The journal fully endorses the goals of updating knowledge and facilitating the acquisition of key developments in internal medicine applied to clinical practice. Revista Clínica Española is subject to a thorough double blind review of the received articles written in Spanish or English. Nine issues are published each year, including mostly originals, reviews and consensus documents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信