{"title":"\"学校离家近 \"还是 \"学校离家近\"?对于 Y 型网络中的个人和家庭旅行者而言,哪种方式更适合早晨通勤?","authors":"Zhao-Rui Li, Xiao Han, Rui Jiang","doi":"10.1016/j.trc.2024.104793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Household travelers typically need to coordinate their travel decisions in various aspects, such as destination and trip-timing, resulting in distinctive travel patterns compared to individual travelers. This paper investigates the morning commute problem in a “Y-shaped” network featuring “school near workplace” in consideration of both individual and household travelers and further understands the impact of school locations on the morning commute by comparing it with the “school near home” network. We analytically derive all equilibrium cases in the “school near workplace” network and classify them into three traffic patterns. We analyze the welfare effects of the staggering policy, finding that implementing the staggering policy in the “school near workplace” network can achieve a “win–win” scenario for individuals and household travelers in some equilibrium cases. Also, when the capacity ratio of school-constrained bottleneck to common-constrained bottleneck is below a threshold, which one is better (i.e., “school near workplace” or “school near home”) depends on the free-flow travel costs of the two networks. Locating the school “near workplace” is better than “near home” when the difference in the free-flow related costs for children between the two networks is not very large. Furthermore, we analyze the welfare effects of bottleneck expansion in the “school near workplace” network, finding that bottleneck expansion paradox may emerge when expanding the school-constrained bottleneck. Although properly designing the schedule gap can eliminate the paradox, a significant increase in the schedule gap may be needed to escape from the paradoxical cases when the common-constrained bottleneck capacity is slightly larger than the school-constrained bottleneck capacity. Our study sheds light on the importance of school locations in determining the performance of traffic management policies in the morning commute with both individual and household travelers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54417,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part C-Emerging Technologies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“School near workplace” or “school near home”: Which one is better for the morning commute with both individual and household travelers in Y-shaped networks?\",\"authors\":\"Zhao-Rui Li, Xiao Han, Rui Jiang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.trc.2024.104793\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Household travelers typically need to coordinate their travel decisions in various aspects, such as destination and trip-timing, resulting in distinctive travel patterns compared to individual travelers. This paper investigates the morning commute problem in a “Y-shaped” network featuring “school near workplace” in consideration of both individual and household travelers and further understands the impact of school locations on the morning commute by comparing it with the “school near home” network. We analytically derive all equilibrium cases in the “school near workplace” network and classify them into three traffic patterns. We analyze the welfare effects of the staggering policy, finding that implementing the staggering policy in the “school near workplace” network can achieve a “win–win” scenario for individuals and household travelers in some equilibrium cases. Also, when the capacity ratio of school-constrained bottleneck to common-constrained bottleneck is below a threshold, which one is better (i.e., “school near workplace” or “school near home”) depends on the free-flow travel costs of the two networks. Locating the school “near workplace” is better than “near home” when the difference in the free-flow related costs for children between the two networks is not very large. Furthermore, we analyze the welfare effects of bottleneck expansion in the “school near workplace” network, finding that bottleneck expansion paradox may emerge when expanding the school-constrained bottleneck. Although properly designing the schedule gap can eliminate the paradox, a significant increase in the schedule gap may be needed to escape from the paradoxical cases when the common-constrained bottleneck capacity is slightly larger than the school-constrained bottleneck capacity. Our study sheds light on the importance of school locations in determining the performance of traffic management policies in the morning commute with both individual and household travelers.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54417,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Research Part C-Emerging Technologies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Research Part C-Emerging Technologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968090X24003140\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part C-Emerging Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968090X24003140","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
“School near workplace” or “school near home”: Which one is better for the morning commute with both individual and household travelers in Y-shaped networks?
Household travelers typically need to coordinate their travel decisions in various aspects, such as destination and trip-timing, resulting in distinctive travel patterns compared to individual travelers. This paper investigates the morning commute problem in a “Y-shaped” network featuring “school near workplace” in consideration of both individual and household travelers and further understands the impact of school locations on the morning commute by comparing it with the “school near home” network. We analytically derive all equilibrium cases in the “school near workplace” network and classify them into three traffic patterns. We analyze the welfare effects of the staggering policy, finding that implementing the staggering policy in the “school near workplace” network can achieve a “win–win” scenario for individuals and household travelers in some equilibrium cases. Also, when the capacity ratio of school-constrained bottleneck to common-constrained bottleneck is below a threshold, which one is better (i.e., “school near workplace” or “school near home”) depends on the free-flow travel costs of the two networks. Locating the school “near workplace” is better than “near home” when the difference in the free-flow related costs for children between the two networks is not very large. Furthermore, we analyze the welfare effects of bottleneck expansion in the “school near workplace” network, finding that bottleneck expansion paradox may emerge when expanding the school-constrained bottleneck. Although properly designing the schedule gap can eliminate the paradox, a significant increase in the schedule gap may be needed to escape from the paradoxical cases when the common-constrained bottleneck capacity is slightly larger than the school-constrained bottleneck capacity. Our study sheds light on the importance of school locations in determining the performance of traffic management policies in the morning commute with both individual and household travelers.
期刊介绍:
Transportation Research: Part C (TR_C) is dedicated to showcasing high-quality, scholarly research that delves into the development, applications, and implications of transportation systems and emerging technologies. Our focus lies not solely on individual technologies, but rather on their broader implications for the planning, design, operation, control, maintenance, and rehabilitation of transportation systems, services, and components. In essence, the intellectual core of the journal revolves around the transportation aspect rather than the technology itself. We actively encourage the integration of quantitative methods from diverse fields such as operations research, control systems, complex networks, computer science, and artificial intelligence. Join us in exploring the intersection of transportation systems and emerging technologies to drive innovation and progress in the field.