独立于型号的拒收跟踪测试

IF 1.5 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
{"title":"独立于型号的拒收跟踪测试","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.scico.2024.103173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Software Testing is normally one of the main forms of verification and validation used in software development but it is often manual and so expensive and error prone. One of the proposed solutions to this is to use model-based testing, in which testing is based on a model of how the system should behave. If the model has a formal semantics, then there is potential to automate systematic test generation. In this paper we consider the case where the semantics of the model is a set of refusal traces, also called failure traces. We show how the notions of fundamental refusal and fundamental refusal trace can be used to derive a normalised transition system, which we call an <em>observation transition system</em> (OTS), from the semantics. We then show how, if this OTS has finitely many states, and we are given a bound <em>m</em>, one can produce a corresponding complete test suite: one that is guaranteed to determine correctness as long as the number of states of the OTS defined by the semantics of the system under test has no more than <em>m</em> states. In practice, the choice of value for <em>m</em> might be based on domain knowledge or a cost-benefit analysis. As far as we are aware, this is the first work to show how a finite complete test suite can be derived when the semantics under consideration is a set of refusal traces.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49561,"journal":{"name":"Science of Computer Programming","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167642324000960/pdfft?md5=424d76b3b101250fcecfac3f3f518da6&pid=1-s2.0-S0167642324000960-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Model independent refusal trace testing\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.scico.2024.103173\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Software Testing is normally one of the main forms of verification and validation used in software development but it is often manual and so expensive and error prone. One of the proposed solutions to this is to use model-based testing, in which testing is based on a model of how the system should behave. If the model has a formal semantics, then there is potential to automate systematic test generation. In this paper we consider the case where the semantics of the model is a set of refusal traces, also called failure traces. We show how the notions of fundamental refusal and fundamental refusal trace can be used to derive a normalised transition system, which we call an <em>observation transition system</em> (OTS), from the semantics. We then show how, if this OTS has finitely many states, and we are given a bound <em>m</em>, one can produce a corresponding complete test suite: one that is guaranteed to determine correctness as long as the number of states of the OTS defined by the semantics of the system under test has no more than <em>m</em> states. In practice, the choice of value for <em>m</em> might be based on domain knowledge or a cost-benefit analysis. As far as we are aware, this is the first work to show how a finite complete test suite can be derived when the semantics under consideration is a set of refusal traces.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49561,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science of Computer Programming\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167642324000960/pdfft?md5=424d76b3b101250fcecfac3f3f518da6&pid=1-s2.0-S0167642324000960-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science of Computer Programming\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167642324000960\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of Computer Programming","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167642324000960","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

软件测试通常是软件开发过程中验证和确认的主要形式之一,但通常都是手工操作,成本高昂且容易出错。为此提出的解决方案之一是使用基于模型的测试,即根据系统应如何运行的模型进行测试。如果模型具有正式的语义,那么就有可能自动生成系统测试。在本文中,我们考虑的情况是,模型的语义是一组拒绝痕迹,也称为故障痕迹。我们展示了如何利用基本拒绝和基本拒绝轨迹的概念,从语义中推导出一个规范化的转换系统,我们称之为观测转换系统(OTS)。然后,我们将展示,如果这个 OTS 有有限多个状态,并且我们给定了一个约束 m,那么如何生成相应的完整测试套件:只要被测系统的语义所定义的 OTS 的状态数不超过 m,就能保证确定其正确性。在实践中,m 值的选择可能基于领域知识或成本效益分析。据我们所知,这是第一项展示如何在所考虑的语义是一组拒绝轨迹的情况下推导出有限的完整测试套件的工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Model independent refusal trace testing

Software Testing is normally one of the main forms of verification and validation used in software development but it is often manual and so expensive and error prone. One of the proposed solutions to this is to use model-based testing, in which testing is based on a model of how the system should behave. If the model has a formal semantics, then there is potential to automate systematic test generation. In this paper we consider the case where the semantics of the model is a set of refusal traces, also called failure traces. We show how the notions of fundamental refusal and fundamental refusal trace can be used to derive a normalised transition system, which we call an observation transition system (OTS), from the semantics. We then show how, if this OTS has finitely many states, and we are given a bound m, one can produce a corresponding complete test suite: one that is guaranteed to determine correctness as long as the number of states of the OTS defined by the semantics of the system under test has no more than m states. In practice, the choice of value for m might be based on domain knowledge or a cost-benefit analysis. As far as we are aware, this is the first work to show how a finite complete test suite can be derived when the semantics under consideration is a set of refusal traces.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Science of Computer Programming
Science of Computer Programming 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Science of Computer Programming is dedicated to the distribution of research results in the areas of software systems development, use and maintenance, including the software aspects of hardware design. The journal has a wide scope ranging from the many facets of methodological foundations to the details of technical issues andthe aspects of industrial practice. The subjects of interest to SCP cover the entire spectrum of methods for the entire life cycle of software systems, including • Requirements, specification, design, validation, verification, coding, testing, maintenance, metrics and renovation of software; • Design, implementation and evaluation of programming languages; • Programming environments, development tools, visualisation and animation; • Management of the development process; • Human factors in software, software for social interaction, software for social computing; • Cyber physical systems, and software for the interaction between the physical and the machine; • Software aspects of infrastructure services, system administration, and network management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信