Alexander T Moffett, Scott D Halpern, Gary Eric Weissman
{"title":"支气管扩张后 FEV1/FVC < 0.7 对慢性阻塞性肺疾病诊断和治疗的影响:回归不连续设计","authors":"Alexander T Moffett, Scott D Halpern, Gary Eric Weissman","doi":"10.1101/2024.08.05.24311519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background\nGlobal Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guidelines recommend the diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) only in patients with a post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second to forced vital capacity ratio (FEV1/FVC) less than 0.7. However the impact of this recommendation on clinical practice is unknown. Research Question\nWhat is the effect of a documented post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC < 0.7 on the diagnosis and treatment of COPD? Study Design and Methods\nWe used a national electronic health record database to identify clinical encounters be- tween 2007 to 2022 with patients 18 years of age and older in which a post-bronchodilator FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC value was documented. An encounter was associated with a COPD diagnosis if a diagnostic code for COPD was assigned, and was associated with COPD treatment if a prescription for a medication commonly used to treat COPD was filled within 90 days. We used a regression discontinuity design to measure the effect of a post-bronchodilator FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC < 0.7 on COPD diagnosis and treatment. Results\nAmong 27 817 clinical encounters, involving 18 991 patients, a post-bronchodilator FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC < 0.7 was present in 14 876 (53.4%). The presence of a documented post-bronchodilator FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC < 0.7 had a small effect on the probability of a COPD diagnosis, increasing by\n26.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1% to 10.9%) from 38.0% just above the 0.7 cutoff to 44.0% just below this cutoff. The presence of a documented post-bronchodilator FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC had no effect on the probability of COPD treatment (−2.1%, 95% CI −7.2% to 3.0%). Interpretation\nThe presence of a documented post-bronchodilator FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC < 0.7 has only a small effect on the probability that a clinician will make a guideline-concordant diagnosis of COPD and has no effect on corresponding treatment decisions.","PeriodicalId":501074,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Respiratory Medicine","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of a Post-Bronchodilator FEV1/FVC < 0.7 on COPD Diagnosis and Treatment: A Regression Discontinuity Design\",\"authors\":\"Alexander T Moffett, Scott D Halpern, Gary Eric Weissman\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.08.05.24311519\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background\\nGlobal Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guidelines recommend the diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) only in patients with a post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second to forced vital capacity ratio (FEV1/FVC) less than 0.7. However the impact of this recommendation on clinical practice is unknown. Research Question\\nWhat is the effect of a documented post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC < 0.7 on the diagnosis and treatment of COPD? Study Design and Methods\\nWe used a national electronic health record database to identify clinical encounters be- tween 2007 to 2022 with patients 18 years of age and older in which a post-bronchodilator FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC value was documented. An encounter was associated with a COPD diagnosis if a diagnostic code for COPD was assigned, and was associated with COPD treatment if a prescription for a medication commonly used to treat COPD was filled within 90 days. We used a regression discontinuity design to measure the effect of a post-bronchodilator FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC < 0.7 on COPD diagnosis and treatment. Results\\nAmong 27 817 clinical encounters, involving 18 991 patients, a post-bronchodilator FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC < 0.7 was present in 14 876 (53.4%). The presence of a documented post-bronchodilator FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC < 0.7 had a small effect on the probability of a COPD diagnosis, increasing by\\n26.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1% to 10.9%) from 38.0% just above the 0.7 cutoff to 44.0% just below this cutoff. The presence of a documented post-bronchodilator FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC had no effect on the probability of COPD treatment (−2.1%, 95% CI −7.2% to 3.0%). Interpretation\\nThe presence of a documented post-bronchodilator FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC < 0.7 has only a small effect on the probability that a clinician will make a guideline-concordant diagnosis of COPD and has no effect on corresponding treatment decisions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501074,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Respiratory Medicine\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Respiratory Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.05.24311519\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Respiratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.05.24311519","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Effect of a Post-Bronchodilator FEV1/FVC < 0.7 on COPD Diagnosis and Treatment: A Regression Discontinuity Design
Background
Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guidelines recommend the diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) only in patients with a post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second to forced vital capacity ratio (FEV1/FVC) less than 0.7. However the impact of this recommendation on clinical practice is unknown. Research Question
What is the effect of a documented post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC < 0.7 on the diagnosis and treatment of COPD? Study Design and Methods
We used a national electronic health record database to identify clinical encounters be- tween 2007 to 2022 with patients 18 years of age and older in which a post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC value was documented. An encounter was associated with a COPD diagnosis if a diagnostic code for COPD was assigned, and was associated with COPD treatment if a prescription for a medication commonly used to treat COPD was filled within 90 days. We used a regression discontinuity design to measure the effect of a post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC < 0.7 on COPD diagnosis and treatment. Results
Among 27 817 clinical encounters, involving 18 991 patients, a post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC < 0.7 was present in 14 876 (53.4%). The presence of a documented post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC < 0.7 had a small effect on the probability of a COPD diagnosis, increasing by
26.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1% to 10.9%) from 38.0% just above the 0.7 cutoff to 44.0% just below this cutoff. The presence of a documented post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC had no effect on the probability of COPD treatment (−2.1%, 95% CI −7.2% to 3.0%). Interpretation
The presence of a documented post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC < 0.7 has only a small effect on the probability that a clinician will make a guideline-concordant diagnosis of COPD and has no effect on corresponding treatment decisions.