已实现波动率预测的动态性:跨参数变化评估 GARCH 模型和深度学习算法

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Omer Burak Akgun, Emrah Gulay
{"title":"已实现波动率预测的动态性:跨参数变化评估 GARCH 模型和深度学习算法","authors":"Omer Burak Akgun, Emrah Gulay","doi":"10.1007/s10614-024-10694-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The modeling and forecasting of return volatility for the top three cryptocurrencies, which are identified by the highest trading volumes, is the main focus of the study. Eleven different GARCH-type models were analyzed using a comprehensive methodology in six different distributions, and deep learning algorithms were used to rigorously assess each model’s forecasting performance. Additionally, the study investigates the impact of selecting dynamic parameters for the forecasting performance of these models. This study investigates if there are any appreciable differences in forecast outcomes between the two different realized variance calculations and variations in training size. Further investigation focuses on how the use of expanding and rolling windows affects the optimal window type for forecasting. Finally, the importance of choosing different error measurements is emphasized in the framework of comparing forecasting performances. Our results indicate that in GARCH-type models, 5-minute realized variance shows the best forecasting performance, while in deep learning models, median realized variance (MedRV) has the best performance. Moreover, it has been determined that an increase in the training/test ratio and the selection of the rolling window approach both play important roles in achieving better forecast accuracy. Finally, our results show that deep learning models outperform GARCH-type models in volatility forecasts.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dynamics in Realized Volatility Forecasting: Evaluating GARCH Models and Deep Learning Algorithms Across Parameter Variations\",\"authors\":\"Omer Burak Akgun, Emrah Gulay\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10614-024-10694-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The modeling and forecasting of return volatility for the top three cryptocurrencies, which are identified by the highest trading volumes, is the main focus of the study. Eleven different GARCH-type models were analyzed using a comprehensive methodology in six different distributions, and deep learning algorithms were used to rigorously assess each model’s forecasting performance. Additionally, the study investigates the impact of selecting dynamic parameters for the forecasting performance of these models. This study investigates if there are any appreciable differences in forecast outcomes between the two different realized variance calculations and variations in training size. Further investigation focuses on how the use of expanding and rolling windows affects the optimal window type for forecasting. Finally, the importance of choosing different error measurements is emphasized in the framework of comparing forecasting performances. Our results indicate that in GARCH-type models, 5-minute realized variance shows the best forecasting performance, while in deep learning models, median realized variance (MedRV) has the best performance. Moreover, it has been determined that an increase in the training/test ratio and the selection of the rolling window approach both play important roles in achieving better forecast accuracy. Finally, our results show that deep learning models outperform GARCH-type models in volatility forecasts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-024-10694-2\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-024-10694-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的重点是对交易量最高的前三种加密货币的回报波动性进行建模和预测。采用综合方法分析了六种不同分布的 11 种不同 GARCH 类型模型,并使用深度学习算法严格评估了每个模型的预测性能。此外,本研究还调查了选择动态参数对这些模型预测性能的影响。本研究调查了两种不同的已实现方差计算方法和训练规模变化之间的预测结果是否存在明显差异。进一步调查的重点是扩展窗口和滚动窗口的使用如何影响预测的最佳窗口类型。最后,在比较预测性能的框架下,强调了选择不同误差测量的重要性。我们的研究结果表明,在 GARCH 类型模型中,5 分钟已实现方差显示出最佳预测性能,而在深度学习模型中,中位已实现方差(MedRV)具有最佳性能。此外,我们还确定,提高训练/测试比率和选择滚动窗口方法对获得更好的预测准确性都有重要作用。最后,我们的结果表明,深度学习模型在波动率预测方面优于 GARCH 类型模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Dynamics in Realized Volatility Forecasting: Evaluating GARCH Models and Deep Learning Algorithms Across Parameter Variations

Dynamics in Realized Volatility Forecasting: Evaluating GARCH Models and Deep Learning Algorithms Across Parameter Variations

The modeling and forecasting of return volatility for the top three cryptocurrencies, which are identified by the highest trading volumes, is the main focus of the study. Eleven different GARCH-type models were analyzed using a comprehensive methodology in six different distributions, and deep learning algorithms were used to rigorously assess each model’s forecasting performance. Additionally, the study investigates the impact of selecting dynamic parameters for the forecasting performance of these models. This study investigates if there are any appreciable differences in forecast outcomes between the two different realized variance calculations and variations in training size. Further investigation focuses on how the use of expanding and rolling windows affects the optimal window type for forecasting. Finally, the importance of choosing different error measurements is emphasized in the framework of comparing forecasting performances. Our results indicate that in GARCH-type models, 5-minute realized variance shows the best forecasting performance, while in deep learning models, median realized variance (MedRV) has the best performance. Moreover, it has been determined that an increase in the training/test ratio and the selection of the rolling window approach both play important roles in achieving better forecast accuracy. Finally, our results show that deep learning models outperform GARCH-type models in volatility forecasts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信