有效的非对称因果检验

Abdulnasser Hatemi-J
{"title":"有效的非对称因果检验","authors":"Abdulnasser Hatemi-J","doi":"arxiv-2408.03137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Asymmetric causality tests are increasingly gaining popularity in different\nscientific fields. This approach corresponds better to reality since logical\nreasons behind asymmetric behavior exist and need to be considered in empirical\ninvestigations. Hatemi-J (2012) introduced the asymmetric causality tests via\npartial cumulative sums for positive and negative components of the variables\noperating within the vector autoregressive (VAR) model. However, since the the\nresiduals across the equations in the VAR model are not independent, the\nordinary least squares method for estimating the parameters is not efficient.\nAdditionally, asymmetric causality tests mean having different causal\nparameters (i.e., for positive or negative components), thus, it is crucial to\nassess not only if these causal parameters are individually statistically\nsignificant, but also if their difference is statistically significant.\nConsequently, tests of difference between estimated causal parameters should\nexplicitly be conducted, which are neglected in the existing literature. The\npurpose of the current paper is to deal with these issues explicitly. An\napplication is provided, and ten different hypotheses pertinent to the\nasymmetric causal interaction between two largest financial markets worldwide\nare efficiently tested within a multivariate setting.","PeriodicalId":501293,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - ECON - Econometrics","volume":"90 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficient Asymmetric Causality Tests\",\"authors\":\"Abdulnasser Hatemi-J\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2408.03137\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Asymmetric causality tests are increasingly gaining popularity in different\\nscientific fields. This approach corresponds better to reality since logical\\nreasons behind asymmetric behavior exist and need to be considered in empirical\\ninvestigations. Hatemi-J (2012) introduced the asymmetric causality tests via\\npartial cumulative sums for positive and negative components of the variables\\noperating within the vector autoregressive (VAR) model. However, since the the\\nresiduals across the equations in the VAR model are not independent, the\\nordinary least squares method for estimating the parameters is not efficient.\\nAdditionally, asymmetric causality tests mean having different causal\\nparameters (i.e., for positive or negative components), thus, it is crucial to\\nassess not only if these causal parameters are individually statistically\\nsignificant, but also if their difference is statistically significant.\\nConsequently, tests of difference between estimated causal parameters should\\nexplicitly be conducted, which are neglected in the existing literature. The\\npurpose of the current paper is to deal with these issues explicitly. An\\napplication is provided, and ten different hypotheses pertinent to the\\nasymmetric causal interaction between two largest financial markets worldwide\\nare efficiently tested within a multivariate setting.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501293,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - ECON - Econometrics\",\"volume\":\"90 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - ECON - Econometrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.03137\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - ECON - Econometrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.03137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

非对称因果关系检验在不同科学领域越来越受欢迎。这种方法更符合实际情况,因为非对称行为背后存在逻辑原因,需要在实证研究中加以考虑。Hatemi-J (2012)引入了非对称因果检验,即对向量自回归(VAR)模型中运行变量的正负分量进行部分累积求和。此外,非对称因果检验意味着有不同的因果参数(即正负分量),因此,不仅要评估这些因果参数是否单独具有统计意义,还要评估它们之间的差异是否具有统计意义。本文旨在明确处理这些问题。本文提供了一个应用,并在多变量环境下有效检验了与全球两个最大金融市场之间非对称因果互动相关的十个不同假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficient Asymmetric Causality Tests
Asymmetric causality tests are increasingly gaining popularity in different scientific fields. This approach corresponds better to reality since logical reasons behind asymmetric behavior exist and need to be considered in empirical investigations. Hatemi-J (2012) introduced the asymmetric causality tests via partial cumulative sums for positive and negative components of the variables operating within the vector autoregressive (VAR) model. However, since the the residuals across the equations in the VAR model are not independent, the ordinary least squares method for estimating the parameters is not efficient. Additionally, asymmetric causality tests mean having different causal parameters (i.e., for positive or negative components), thus, it is crucial to assess not only if these causal parameters are individually statistically significant, but also if their difference is statistically significant. Consequently, tests of difference between estimated causal parameters should explicitly be conducted, which are neglected in the existing literature. The purpose of the current paper is to deal with these issues explicitly. An application is provided, and ten different hypotheses pertinent to the asymmetric causal interaction between two largest financial markets worldwide are efficiently tested within a multivariate setting.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信