欧洲老年人接种呼吸道合胞病毒疫苗成本效益的影响因素:多国分析

Xiao Li, Lander Willem, Caroline Klint Johannesen, Arantxa Urchueguia Fornes, Toni Lehtonen, Richard Osei-Yeboah, Heini Salo, Alejandro Orrico Sanchez, Javier Diez-Domingo, Mark Jit, Joke Bilcke, Philippe Beutels
{"title":"欧洲老年人接种呼吸道合胞病毒疫苗成本效益的影响因素:多国分析","authors":"Xiao Li, Lander Willem, Caroline Klint Johannesen, Arantxa Urchueguia Fornes, Toni Lehtonen, Richard Osei-Yeboah, Heini Salo, Alejandro Orrico Sanchez, Javier Diez-Domingo, Mark Jit, Joke Bilcke, Philippe Beutels","doi":"10.1101/2024.08.06.24311440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: We aimed to identify influential drivers of the cost-effectiveness of older adult respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccination in Denmark, Finland, the Netherlands and Valencia-Spain.\nMethods: A static multi-cohort model was parameterised using country- and age-specific hospitalisations using three approaches: (1) the International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-coded hospitalisations, (2) laboratory RSV-confirmed hospitalisations and (3) time-series modelling (TSM). Plausible hypothetical RSV vaccine characteristics were derived from two protein subunit vaccines for adults aged greater than 60 years (60y+). Costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were compared between four strategies: (a) no intervention, and RSV vaccination in adults (b) 60y+; (c) 65y+; (d) 75y+, from both the healthcare payers and societal perspectives. Value of information, probabilistic sensitivity and scenario analyses identified influential drivers. Results: Besides vaccine price, the hospitalisation estimates were most influential: Using adjusted RSV-ICD-coded hospitalisations at a vaccine price of EUR150 per dose, no intervention was cost-effective up to willingness-to-pay (WTP) values of EUR 80 000 per QALY gained in Denmark, and up to EUR 34 000 and EUR 62 000 per QALY gained in Finland and the Netherlands, respectively. Using the adjusted RSV-confirmed dataset, the findings were consistent in Denmark and comparable in Finland. In Spain-Valencia, the 75y+ strategy became cost-effective at WTP > EUR 17 000. Using TSM-based estimates, the 75y+ strategy was cost-effective at WTP > EUR 16 000, > EUR 28 000, >EUR 13 000 and >EUR 37 000 in Denmark, Finland, the Netherlands and Spain-Valencia, respectively. The (in-hospital) case fatality ratio and the specification of its age dependency were both influential. Specifying different ways in which protective efficacy waned and RSV seasons were shaped and timed had both relatively limited impact on results. Conclusion: Data gaps and uncertainties on the RSV-related burden in older adults persists and influences the cost-effectiveness of RSV vaccination. More refined age- and country-specific data on the RSV attributable burden are crucial to aid decision making.","PeriodicalId":501072,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Health Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influential drivers of the cost-effectiveness of respiratory syncytial virus vaccination in European older adults: A multi-country analysis\",\"authors\":\"Xiao Li, Lander Willem, Caroline Klint Johannesen, Arantxa Urchueguia Fornes, Toni Lehtonen, Richard Osei-Yeboah, Heini Salo, Alejandro Orrico Sanchez, Javier Diez-Domingo, Mark Jit, Joke Bilcke, Philippe Beutels\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.08.06.24311440\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: We aimed to identify influential drivers of the cost-effectiveness of older adult respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccination in Denmark, Finland, the Netherlands and Valencia-Spain.\\nMethods: A static multi-cohort model was parameterised using country- and age-specific hospitalisations using three approaches: (1) the International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-coded hospitalisations, (2) laboratory RSV-confirmed hospitalisations and (3) time-series modelling (TSM). Plausible hypothetical RSV vaccine characteristics were derived from two protein subunit vaccines for adults aged greater than 60 years (60y+). Costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were compared between four strategies: (a) no intervention, and RSV vaccination in adults (b) 60y+; (c) 65y+; (d) 75y+, from both the healthcare payers and societal perspectives. Value of information, probabilistic sensitivity and scenario analyses identified influential drivers. Results: Besides vaccine price, the hospitalisation estimates were most influential: Using adjusted RSV-ICD-coded hospitalisations at a vaccine price of EUR150 per dose, no intervention was cost-effective up to willingness-to-pay (WTP) values of EUR 80 000 per QALY gained in Denmark, and up to EUR 34 000 and EUR 62 000 per QALY gained in Finland and the Netherlands, respectively. Using the adjusted RSV-confirmed dataset, the findings were consistent in Denmark and comparable in Finland. In Spain-Valencia, the 75y+ strategy became cost-effective at WTP > EUR 17 000. Using TSM-based estimates, the 75y+ strategy was cost-effective at WTP > EUR 16 000, > EUR 28 000, >EUR 13 000 and >EUR 37 000 in Denmark, Finland, the Netherlands and Spain-Valencia, respectively. The (in-hospital) case fatality ratio and the specification of its age dependency were both influential. Specifying different ways in which protective efficacy waned and RSV seasons were shaped and timed had both relatively limited impact on results. Conclusion: Data gaps and uncertainties on the RSV-related burden in older adults persists and influences the cost-effectiveness of RSV vaccination. More refined age- and country-specific data on the RSV attributable burden are crucial to aid decision making.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501072,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Health Economics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Health Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.06.24311440\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Health Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.06.24311440","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:我们旨在确定丹麦、芬兰、荷兰和西班牙巴伦西亚地区老年人呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)疫苗接种成本效益的影响因素:静态多队列模型的参数设置采用了国家和年龄特定的住院病例,使用了三种方法:(1)国际疾病分类(ICD)编码的住院病例;(2)实验室确诊的 RSV 住院病例;(3)时间序列建模(TSM)。可信的假定 RSV 疫苗特征来自两种蛋白亚单位疫苗,适用于 60 岁以上的成年人(60 岁以上)。从医疗支付方和社会的角度比较了以下四种策略的成本和质量调整生命年(QALYs):(a) 不采取干预措施;(b) 60 岁以上;(c) 65 岁以上;(d) 75 岁以上成人 RSV 疫苗接种。信息价值、概率敏感性和情景分析确定了有影响的驱动因素。结果:除疫苗价格外,影响最大的是住院估算:使用调整后的 RSV-ICD 编码住院率,在疫苗价格为每剂 150 欧元的情况下,丹麦每获得一个 QALY 值的支付意愿(WTP)值为 80,000 欧元,芬兰和荷兰每获得一个 QALY 值的支付意愿(WTP)值分别为 34,000 欧元和 62,000 欧元,没有任何干预措施是具有成本效益的。使用调整后的 RSV 确认数据集,丹麦的研究结果一致,芬兰的研究结果与之相当。在西班牙-巴伦西亚,75y+ 策略的成本效益为 WTP > 17 000 欧元。在丹麦、芬兰、荷兰和西班牙-瓦伦西亚,使用基于 TSM 的估算,75y+ 策略的成本效益分别为 WTP > 16 000 欧元、> 28 000 欧元、>13 000 欧元和>37 000 欧元。院内)病死率及其年龄依赖性的规定都有影响。规定保护效力减弱的不同方式以及 RSV 季节的形成和时间对结果的影响相对有限。结论有关老年人 RSV 相关负担的数据缺口和不确定性依然存在,并影响着 RSV 疫苗接种的成本效益。关于 RSV 可归因负担的更精细的年龄和国家数据对于帮助决策至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Influential drivers of the cost-effectiveness of respiratory syncytial virus vaccination in European older adults: A multi-country analysis
Background: We aimed to identify influential drivers of the cost-effectiveness of older adult respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccination in Denmark, Finland, the Netherlands and Valencia-Spain. Methods: A static multi-cohort model was parameterised using country- and age-specific hospitalisations using three approaches: (1) the International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-coded hospitalisations, (2) laboratory RSV-confirmed hospitalisations and (3) time-series modelling (TSM). Plausible hypothetical RSV vaccine characteristics were derived from two protein subunit vaccines for adults aged greater than 60 years (60y+). Costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were compared between four strategies: (a) no intervention, and RSV vaccination in adults (b) 60y+; (c) 65y+; (d) 75y+, from both the healthcare payers and societal perspectives. Value of information, probabilistic sensitivity and scenario analyses identified influential drivers. Results: Besides vaccine price, the hospitalisation estimates were most influential: Using adjusted RSV-ICD-coded hospitalisations at a vaccine price of EUR150 per dose, no intervention was cost-effective up to willingness-to-pay (WTP) values of EUR 80 000 per QALY gained in Denmark, and up to EUR 34 000 and EUR 62 000 per QALY gained in Finland and the Netherlands, respectively. Using the adjusted RSV-confirmed dataset, the findings were consistent in Denmark and comparable in Finland. In Spain-Valencia, the 75y+ strategy became cost-effective at WTP > EUR 17 000. Using TSM-based estimates, the 75y+ strategy was cost-effective at WTP > EUR 16 000, > EUR 28 000, >EUR 13 000 and >EUR 37 000 in Denmark, Finland, the Netherlands and Spain-Valencia, respectively. The (in-hospital) case fatality ratio and the specification of its age dependency were both influential. Specifying different ways in which protective efficacy waned and RSV seasons were shaped and timed had both relatively limited impact on results. Conclusion: Data gaps and uncertainties on the RSV-related burden in older adults persists and influences the cost-effectiveness of RSV vaccination. More refined age- and country-specific data on the RSV attributable burden are crucial to aid decision making.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信