规范和非规范 PRC1 对神经干细胞命运的调控具有不同作用

Janine Hoffmann, Theresa M. Schütze, Annika Kolodziejczyk, Annekathrin Kränkel, Susanne Reinhardt, Razvan P. Derihaci, Cahit Birdir, Pauline Wimberger, Haruhiko Koseki, Mareike Albert
{"title":"规范和非规范 PRC1 对神经干细胞命运的调控具有不同作用","authors":"Janine Hoffmann, Theresa M. Schütze, Annika Kolodziejczyk, Annekathrin Kränkel, Susanne Reinhardt, Razvan P. Derihaci, Cahit Birdir, Pauline Wimberger, Haruhiko Koseki, Mareike Albert","doi":"10.1101/2024.08.07.606990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Neocortex development is characterized by sequential phases of neural progenitor cell (NPC) expansion, neurogenesis and gliogenesis. Polycomb-mediated epigenetic mechanisms are known to play important roles in regulating the lineage potential of NPCs during development. The composition of Polycomb Repressive Complex 1 (PRC1) is highly diverse in mammals and was hypothesized to contribute to context-specific regulation of cell fate. Here, we have performed side-by-side comparison of the role of canonical PRC1.2/1.4 and non-canonical PRC1.3/1.5, all of which are expressed in the developing neocortex, in NSC proliferation and differentiation. We found that the deletion of <em>Pcgf2/4</em> in NSCs led to a strong reduction in proliferation and to altered lineage fate, both during the neurogenic and gliogenic phase, whereas <em>Pcgf3/5</em> played a minor role. Mechanistically, genes encoding stem cell and neurogenic factors were bound by PRC1 and differentially expressed upon <em>Pcgf2/4</em> deletion. Thus, rather than different PRC1 sub-complexes contributing to different phases of neural development, we found that canonical PRC1 played a more significant role in NSC regulation during proliferative, neurogenic and gliogenic phases compared to non-canonical PRC1.","PeriodicalId":501269,"journal":{"name":"bioRxiv - Developmental Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Canonical and non-canonical PRC1 differentially contribute to the regulation of neural stem cell fate\",\"authors\":\"Janine Hoffmann, Theresa M. Schütze, Annika Kolodziejczyk, Annekathrin Kränkel, Susanne Reinhardt, Razvan P. Derihaci, Cahit Birdir, Pauline Wimberger, Haruhiko Koseki, Mareike Albert\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.08.07.606990\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Neocortex development is characterized by sequential phases of neural progenitor cell (NPC) expansion, neurogenesis and gliogenesis. Polycomb-mediated epigenetic mechanisms are known to play important roles in regulating the lineage potential of NPCs during development. The composition of Polycomb Repressive Complex 1 (PRC1) is highly diverse in mammals and was hypothesized to contribute to context-specific regulation of cell fate. Here, we have performed side-by-side comparison of the role of canonical PRC1.2/1.4 and non-canonical PRC1.3/1.5, all of which are expressed in the developing neocortex, in NSC proliferation and differentiation. We found that the deletion of <em>Pcgf2/4</em> in NSCs led to a strong reduction in proliferation and to altered lineage fate, both during the neurogenic and gliogenic phase, whereas <em>Pcgf3/5</em> played a minor role. Mechanistically, genes encoding stem cell and neurogenic factors were bound by PRC1 and differentially expressed upon <em>Pcgf2/4</em> deletion. Thus, rather than different PRC1 sub-complexes contributing to different phases of neural development, we found that canonical PRC1 played a more significant role in NSC regulation during proliferative, neurogenic and gliogenic phases compared to non-canonical PRC1.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501269,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"bioRxiv - Developmental Biology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"bioRxiv - Developmental Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.07.606990\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"bioRxiv - Developmental Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.07.606990","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

神经皮层的发育以神经祖细胞(NPC)扩增、神经发生和胶质细胞生成的连续阶段为特征。众所周知,多聚胞介导的表观遗传机制在发育过程中调节神经祖细胞的系潜能方面发挥着重要作用。在哺乳动物中,多聚胞抑制复合体 1(PRC1)的组成具有高度的多样性,据推测它有助于对细胞命运进行特定的调控。在这里,我们并排比较了典型 PRC1.2/1.4 和非典型 PRC1.3/1.5(它们都在发育中的新皮质中表达)在 NSC 增殖和分化中的作用。我们发现,在神经原阶段和神经胶质细胞形成阶段,NSCs 中 Pcgf2/4 基因的缺失会导致增殖的显著减少和细胞系命运的改变,而 Pcgf3/5 的作用较小。从机制上讲,编码干细胞和神经源因子的基因与PRC1结合,并在Pcgf2/4缺失时有不同的表达。因此,我们发现,与非经典PRC1相比,经典PRC1在增殖期、神经源性期和神经胶质形成期的NSC调控中发挥了更重要的作用,而不是不同的PRC1亚复合物对神经发育的不同阶段做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Canonical and non-canonical PRC1 differentially contribute to the regulation of neural stem cell fate
Neocortex development is characterized by sequential phases of neural progenitor cell (NPC) expansion, neurogenesis and gliogenesis. Polycomb-mediated epigenetic mechanisms are known to play important roles in regulating the lineage potential of NPCs during development. The composition of Polycomb Repressive Complex 1 (PRC1) is highly diverse in mammals and was hypothesized to contribute to context-specific regulation of cell fate. Here, we have performed side-by-side comparison of the role of canonical PRC1.2/1.4 and non-canonical PRC1.3/1.5, all of which are expressed in the developing neocortex, in NSC proliferation and differentiation. We found that the deletion of Pcgf2/4 in NSCs led to a strong reduction in proliferation and to altered lineage fate, both during the neurogenic and gliogenic phase, whereas Pcgf3/5 played a minor role. Mechanistically, genes encoding stem cell and neurogenic factors were bound by PRC1 and differentially expressed upon Pcgf2/4 deletion. Thus, rather than different PRC1 sub-complexes contributing to different phases of neural development, we found that canonical PRC1 played a more significant role in NSC regulation during proliferative, neurogenic and gliogenic phases compared to non-canonical PRC1.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信