堆肥改良剂类型和施用频率对受火灾影响的草地生态系统的影响

IF 3.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Tyler L. Anthony, Holly J. Stover, Jeremy J. James, Whendee L. Silver
{"title":"堆肥改良剂类型和施用频率对受火灾影响的草地生态系统的影响","authors":"Tyler L. Anthony, Holly J. Stover, Jeremy J. James, Whendee L. Silver","doi":"10.1007/s10021-024-00925-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Composting organic matter can lower the global warming potential of food and agricultural waste and provide a nutrient-rich soil amendment. Compost applications generally increase net primary production (NPP) and soil water-holding capacity and may stimulate soil carbon (C) sequestration. Questions remain regarding the effects of compost nitrogen (N) concentrations and application rates on soil C and greenhouse gas dynamics. In this study, we explored the effects of compost with different initial N quality (food waste versus green waste compost) on soil greenhouse gas fluxes, aboveground biomass, and soil C and N pools in a fire-impacted annual grassland ecosystem. Composts were applied annually once, twice, or three times prior to the onset of the winter rainy season. A low-intensity fire event after the first growing season also allowed us to explore how compost-amended grasslands respond to burning events, which are expected to increase with climate change. After four growing seasons, all compost treatments significantly increased soil C pools from 9.5 ± 0.9 to 30.2 ± 0.7 Mg C ha<sup>−1</sup> (0–40 cm) and 19.5 ± 0.9 to 40.1 ± 0.7 Mg C ha<sup>−1</sup> (0–40 cm) relative to burned and unburned controls, respectively. Gains exceeded the compost-C applied, representing newly fixed C. The higher N food waste compost treatments yielded more cumulative soil C (5.2–10.9 Mg C ha<sup>−1</sup>) and aboveground biomass (0.19–0.66 Mg C ha<sup>−1</sup>) than the lower N green waste compost treatments, suggesting greater N inputs further increased soil stocks. The three-time green waste application increased soil C and N stocks relative to a single application of either compost. There was minimal impact on net ecosystem greenhouse gas emissions. Aboveground biomass accumulation was higher in all compost treatments relative to controls, likely due to increased water-holding capacity and N availability. Results show that higher N compost resulted in larger C gains with little offset from greenhouse gas emissions and that compost amendments may help mediate effects of low-intensity fire by increasing fertility and water-holding capacity.</p>","PeriodicalId":11406,"journal":{"name":"Ecosystems","volume":"59 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impacts of Compost Amendment Type and Application Frequency on a Fire-Impacted Grassland Ecosystem\",\"authors\":\"Tyler L. Anthony, Holly J. Stover, Jeremy J. James, Whendee L. Silver\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10021-024-00925-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Composting organic matter can lower the global warming potential of food and agricultural waste and provide a nutrient-rich soil amendment. Compost applications generally increase net primary production (NPP) and soil water-holding capacity and may stimulate soil carbon (C) sequestration. Questions remain regarding the effects of compost nitrogen (N) concentrations and application rates on soil C and greenhouse gas dynamics. In this study, we explored the effects of compost with different initial N quality (food waste versus green waste compost) on soil greenhouse gas fluxes, aboveground biomass, and soil C and N pools in a fire-impacted annual grassland ecosystem. Composts were applied annually once, twice, or three times prior to the onset of the winter rainy season. A low-intensity fire event after the first growing season also allowed us to explore how compost-amended grasslands respond to burning events, which are expected to increase with climate change. After four growing seasons, all compost treatments significantly increased soil C pools from 9.5 ± 0.9 to 30.2 ± 0.7 Mg C ha<sup>−1</sup> (0–40 cm) and 19.5 ± 0.9 to 40.1 ± 0.7 Mg C ha<sup>−1</sup> (0–40 cm) relative to burned and unburned controls, respectively. Gains exceeded the compost-C applied, representing newly fixed C. The higher N food waste compost treatments yielded more cumulative soil C (5.2–10.9 Mg C ha<sup>−1</sup>) and aboveground biomass (0.19–0.66 Mg C ha<sup>−1</sup>) than the lower N green waste compost treatments, suggesting greater N inputs further increased soil stocks. The three-time green waste application increased soil C and N stocks relative to a single application of either compost. There was minimal impact on net ecosystem greenhouse gas emissions. Aboveground biomass accumulation was higher in all compost treatments relative to controls, likely due to increased water-holding capacity and N availability. Results show that higher N compost resulted in larger C gains with little offset from greenhouse gas emissions and that compost amendments may help mediate effects of low-intensity fire by increasing fertility and water-holding capacity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11406,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecosystems\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecosystems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-024-00925-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecosystems","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-024-00925-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有机物堆肥可以降低食品和农业废弃物的全球升温潜能值,并提供营养丰富的土壤改良剂。施用堆肥通常会提高净初级生产力(NPP)和土壤持水能力,并可促进土壤碳(C)固存。关于堆肥氮(N)浓度和施用率对土壤碳和温室气体动态的影响,仍然存在一些问题。在这项研究中,我们探讨了不同初始氮质量的堆肥(厨余堆肥和绿化垃圾堆肥)对受火灾影响的一年生草地生态系统中土壤温室气体通量、地上生物量以及土壤碳库和氮库的影响。堆肥每年在冬季雨季来临前施用一次、两次或三次。在第一个生长季之后,我们还进行了一次低强度的火灾试验,以探索经堆肥改良的草地如何应对火灾,预计火灾会随着气候变化而增加。经过四个生长季后,与燃烧和未燃烧对照组相比,所有堆肥处理都显著增加了土壤碳库,分别从 9.5 ± 0.9 到 30.2 ± 0.7 兆克碳/公顷(0-40 厘米)和 19.5 ± 0.9 到 40.1 ± 0.7 兆克碳/公顷(0-40 厘米)。与含氮量较低的绿色垃圾堆肥处理相比,含氮量较高的食物垃圾堆肥处理产生了更多的累积土壤碳(5.2-10.9 兆克碳/公顷-1)和地上生物量(0.19-0.66 兆克碳/公顷-1),表明更多的氮投入进一步增加了土壤储量。与单次施用两种堆肥相比,三次施用绿色废物可增加土壤中的碳和氮储量。这对生态系统温室气体净排放量的影响微乎其微。与对照组相比,所有堆肥处理的地上生物量积累都更高,这可能是由于持水能力和氮的可用性提高了。结果表明,高氮堆肥能带来更大的碳增量,而温室气体排放几乎无法抵消;堆肥添加物可通过提高肥力和持水能力来帮助调节低强度火灾的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Impacts of Compost Amendment Type and Application Frequency on a Fire-Impacted Grassland Ecosystem

Impacts of Compost Amendment Type and Application Frequency on a Fire-Impacted Grassland Ecosystem

Composting organic matter can lower the global warming potential of food and agricultural waste and provide a nutrient-rich soil amendment. Compost applications generally increase net primary production (NPP) and soil water-holding capacity and may stimulate soil carbon (C) sequestration. Questions remain regarding the effects of compost nitrogen (N) concentrations and application rates on soil C and greenhouse gas dynamics. In this study, we explored the effects of compost with different initial N quality (food waste versus green waste compost) on soil greenhouse gas fluxes, aboveground biomass, and soil C and N pools in a fire-impacted annual grassland ecosystem. Composts were applied annually once, twice, or three times prior to the onset of the winter rainy season. A low-intensity fire event after the first growing season also allowed us to explore how compost-amended grasslands respond to burning events, which are expected to increase with climate change. After four growing seasons, all compost treatments significantly increased soil C pools from 9.5 ± 0.9 to 30.2 ± 0.7 Mg C ha−1 (0–40 cm) and 19.5 ± 0.9 to 40.1 ± 0.7 Mg C ha−1 (0–40 cm) relative to burned and unburned controls, respectively. Gains exceeded the compost-C applied, representing newly fixed C. The higher N food waste compost treatments yielded more cumulative soil C (5.2–10.9 Mg C ha−1) and aboveground biomass (0.19–0.66 Mg C ha−1) than the lower N green waste compost treatments, suggesting greater N inputs further increased soil stocks. The three-time green waste application increased soil C and N stocks relative to a single application of either compost. There was minimal impact on net ecosystem greenhouse gas emissions. Aboveground biomass accumulation was higher in all compost treatments relative to controls, likely due to increased water-holding capacity and N availability. Results show that higher N compost resulted in larger C gains with little offset from greenhouse gas emissions and that compost amendments may help mediate effects of low-intensity fire by increasing fertility and water-holding capacity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecosystems
Ecosystems 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
2.70%
发文量
71
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: The study and management of ecosystems represent the most dynamic field of contemporary ecology. Ecosystem research bridges fundamental ecology and environmental ecology and environmental problem-solving, and spans boundaries of scale, discipline and perspective. Ecosystems features a distinguished team of editors-in-chief and an outstanding international editorial board, and is seen worldwide as a vital home for publishing significant research as well as editorials, mini-reviews and special features.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信