线条、切割和刻痕:比较(北)爱尔兰和上西里西亚的当代分治叙事

IF 0.5 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE
Leszek Drong
{"title":"线条、切割和刻痕:比较(北)爱尔兰和上西里西亚的当代分治叙事","authors":"Leszek Drong","doi":"10.1080/0950236x.2024.2380274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay offers a comparative perspective on several narrative representations of two partitions that were established in Europe in the 1920s. Partitions of Ireland and of Upper Silesia had marke...","PeriodicalId":45473,"journal":{"name":"TEXTUAL PRACTICE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lines, cuts and engrams: comparing contemporary partition narratives from (Northern) Ireland and Upper Silesia\",\"authors\":\"Leszek Drong\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0950236x.2024.2380274\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This essay offers a comparative perspective on several narrative representations of two partitions that were established in Europe in the 1920s. Partitions of Ireland and of Upper Silesia had marke...\",\"PeriodicalId\":45473,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"TEXTUAL PRACTICE\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"TEXTUAL PRACTICE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0950236x.2024.2380274\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TEXTUAL PRACTICE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0950236x.2024.2380274","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章从比较的角度阐述了 20 世纪 20 年代欧洲两次分治的几种叙事方式。爱尔兰的分治和上西里西亚的分治对欧洲的历史产生了重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lines, cuts and engrams: comparing contemporary partition narratives from (Northern) Ireland and Upper Silesia
This essay offers a comparative perspective on several narrative representations of two partitions that were established in Europe in the 1920s. Partitions of Ireland and of Upper Silesia had marke...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
TEXTUAL PRACTICE
TEXTUAL PRACTICE LITERATURE-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
期刊介绍: Since its launch in 1987, Textual Practice has been Britain"s principal international journal of radical literary studies, continually pressing theory into new engagements. Today, as customary relations among disciplines and media are questioned and transformed, Textual Practice works at the turning points of theory with politics, history and texts. It is intrigued by the processes through which hitherto marginal cultures of ethnicity and sexuality are becoming conceptually central, and by the consequences of these diverse disturbances for educational and cultural institutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信