Jeseok Bang, Griffin Bradford, Kwangmin Kim, Jonathan Lee, Anatolii Polyanskii and David Larbalestier
{"title":"使用高应力 REBCO 线圈对应变超过 0.4% 的弹塑性导体损伤进行评估","authors":"Jeseok Bang, Griffin Bradford, Kwangmin Kim, Jonathan Lee, Anatolii Polyanskii and David Larbalestier","doi":"10.1088/1361-6668/ad6a9d","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent reports on screening current stress simulations of high-field REBCO magnets frequently present peak stresses over 1 GPa. However, this result is probably an unrealistic artifact of purely elastic calculations, considering the macroscopic yield and fracture stresses of approximately 900 MPa and less than 1.1 GPa for Hastelloy substrate-coated conductors. Here, we evaluate elastic-plastic conductor damage at over 0.4% strain using a high-stress REBCO coil exposed to a high field to explore this elastic-plastic regime. The coil was located off-center in a low-temperature superconductor magnet so as to induce a significant screening current in the enhanced radial field. Voltage taps, a Hall sensor, and two strain gauges were used for the instrumentation. We obtained strains exceeding 0.4% near the outward edge during the coil current charge from 350 A to 390 A, where the coil was exposed to external axial and radial magnetic fields of 13 T and 0.5 T. Post mortem results showed wavy plastic deformation, electrical damage, and REBCO defects. An elastic-plastic simulation reproduced the measured strains and predicted that ∼1 GPa stress is sufficient to induce ∼0.9% strain, thus validating our initial concerns with purely elastic models. This paper provides our experimental and simulation results.","PeriodicalId":21985,"journal":{"name":"Superconductor Science and Technology","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Elastic-plastic conductor damage evaluation at over 0.4% strain using a high-stress REBCO coil\",\"authors\":\"Jeseok Bang, Griffin Bradford, Kwangmin Kim, Jonathan Lee, Anatolii Polyanskii and David Larbalestier\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/1361-6668/ad6a9d\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recent reports on screening current stress simulations of high-field REBCO magnets frequently present peak stresses over 1 GPa. However, this result is probably an unrealistic artifact of purely elastic calculations, considering the macroscopic yield and fracture stresses of approximately 900 MPa and less than 1.1 GPa for Hastelloy substrate-coated conductors. Here, we evaluate elastic-plastic conductor damage at over 0.4% strain using a high-stress REBCO coil exposed to a high field to explore this elastic-plastic regime. The coil was located off-center in a low-temperature superconductor magnet so as to induce a significant screening current in the enhanced radial field. Voltage taps, a Hall sensor, and two strain gauges were used for the instrumentation. We obtained strains exceeding 0.4% near the outward edge during the coil current charge from 350 A to 390 A, where the coil was exposed to external axial and radial magnetic fields of 13 T and 0.5 T. Post mortem results showed wavy plastic deformation, electrical damage, and REBCO defects. An elastic-plastic simulation reproduced the measured strains and predicted that ∼1 GPa stress is sufficient to induce ∼0.9% strain, thus validating our initial concerns with purely elastic models. This paper provides our experimental and simulation results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21985,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Superconductor Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Superconductor Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6668/ad6a9d\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Superconductor Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6668/ad6a9d","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
最近关于高磁场 REBCO 磁体屏蔽电流应力模拟的报告经常显示峰值应力超过 1 GPa。然而,考虑到哈氏合金基材涂层导体的宏观屈服应力和断裂应力分别约为 900 兆帕和小于 1.1 GPa,这一结果很可能是纯弹性计算中不切实际的假象。在此,我们使用暴露在高场中的高应力 REBCO 线圈来评估应变超过 0.4% 的弹塑性导体损伤,以探索这种弹塑性机制。线圈位于低温超导体磁体的偏心位置,以便在增强的径向磁场中产生显著的屏蔽电流。仪器使用了电压抽头、霍尔传感器和两个应变计。在线圈电流从 350 A 充至 390 A 期间,我们在外缘附近获得了超过 0.4% 的应变,线圈暴露在 13 T 和 0.5 T 的外部轴向和径向磁场中。弹塑性模拟再现了测量到的应变,并预测 1 GPa 的应力足以引起 0.9% 的应变,从而验证了我们最初对纯弹性模型的担忧。本文提供了我们的实验和模拟结果。
Elastic-plastic conductor damage evaluation at over 0.4% strain using a high-stress REBCO coil
Recent reports on screening current stress simulations of high-field REBCO magnets frequently present peak stresses over 1 GPa. However, this result is probably an unrealistic artifact of purely elastic calculations, considering the macroscopic yield and fracture stresses of approximately 900 MPa and less than 1.1 GPa for Hastelloy substrate-coated conductors. Here, we evaluate elastic-plastic conductor damage at over 0.4% strain using a high-stress REBCO coil exposed to a high field to explore this elastic-plastic regime. The coil was located off-center in a low-temperature superconductor magnet so as to induce a significant screening current in the enhanced radial field. Voltage taps, a Hall sensor, and two strain gauges were used for the instrumentation. We obtained strains exceeding 0.4% near the outward edge during the coil current charge from 350 A to 390 A, where the coil was exposed to external axial and radial magnetic fields of 13 T and 0.5 T. Post mortem results showed wavy plastic deformation, electrical damage, and REBCO defects. An elastic-plastic simulation reproduced the measured strains and predicted that ∼1 GPa stress is sufficient to induce ∼0.9% strain, thus validating our initial concerns with purely elastic models. This paper provides our experimental and simulation results.