LSPR23:来自最大规模实弹网络安全演习的新型 IDS 数据集

IF 3.8 2区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
{"title":"LSPR23:来自最大规模实弹网络安全演习的新型 IDS 数据集","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jisa.2024.103847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Cybersecurity threats are constantly evolving and becoming increasingly sophisticated, automated, adaptive, and intelligent. This makes it difficult for organizations to defend their digital assets. Industry professionals are looking for solutions to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of cybersecurity operations, adopting different strategies. In cybersecurity, the importance of developing new intrusion detection systems (IDSs) to address these threats has emerged. Most of these systems today are based on machine learning. But these systems need high-quality data to “learn” the characteristics of malicious traffic. Such datasets are difficult to obtain and therefore rarely available.</p><p>This paper advances the state of the art and presents a new high-quality IDS dataset. The dataset originates from Locked Shields, one of the world’s most extensive live-fire cyber defense exercises. This ensures that (i) it contains realistic behavior of attackers and defenders; (ii) it contains sophisticated attacks; and (iii) it contains labels, as the actions of the attackers are well-documented.</p><p>The dataset includes approximately 16 million network flows, [F3] of which approximately 1.6 million were labeled malicious. What is unique about this dataset is the use of a new labeling technique that increases the accuracy level of data labeling.</p><p>We evaluate the robustness of our dataset using both quantitative and qualitative methodologies. We begin with a quantitative examination of the Suricata IDS alerts based on signatures and anomalies. Subsequently, we assess the reproducibility of machine learning experiments conducted by Känzig et al., who used a private Locked Shields dataset. We also apply the quality criteria outlined by the evaluation framework proposed by Gharib et al.</p><p>Using our dataset with an existing classifier, we demonstrate comparable results (F1 score of 0.997) to the original paper where the classifier was evaluated on a private dataset (F1 score of 0.984)</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48638,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Information Security and Applications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"LSPR23: A novel IDS dataset from the largest live-fire cybersecurity exercise\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jisa.2024.103847\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Cybersecurity threats are constantly evolving and becoming increasingly sophisticated, automated, adaptive, and intelligent. This makes it difficult for organizations to defend their digital assets. Industry professionals are looking for solutions to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of cybersecurity operations, adopting different strategies. In cybersecurity, the importance of developing new intrusion detection systems (IDSs) to address these threats has emerged. Most of these systems today are based on machine learning. But these systems need high-quality data to “learn” the characteristics of malicious traffic. Such datasets are difficult to obtain and therefore rarely available.</p><p>This paper advances the state of the art and presents a new high-quality IDS dataset. The dataset originates from Locked Shields, one of the world’s most extensive live-fire cyber defense exercises. This ensures that (i) it contains realistic behavior of attackers and defenders; (ii) it contains sophisticated attacks; and (iii) it contains labels, as the actions of the attackers are well-documented.</p><p>The dataset includes approximately 16 million network flows, [F3] of which approximately 1.6 million were labeled malicious. What is unique about this dataset is the use of a new labeling technique that increases the accuracy level of data labeling.</p><p>We evaluate the robustness of our dataset using both quantitative and qualitative methodologies. We begin with a quantitative examination of the Suricata IDS alerts based on signatures and anomalies. Subsequently, we assess the reproducibility of machine learning experiments conducted by Känzig et al., who used a private Locked Shields dataset. We also apply the quality criteria outlined by the evaluation framework proposed by Gharib et al.</p><p>Using our dataset with an existing classifier, we demonstrate comparable results (F1 score of 0.997) to the original paper where the classifier was evaluated on a private dataset (F1 score of 0.984)</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48638,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Information Security and Applications\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Information Security and Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214212624001492\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Information Security and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214212624001492","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

网络安全威胁不断演变,变得越来越复杂、自动化、自适应和智能化。这使得企业难以保护其数字资产。业内专业人士正在寻找解决方案,以提高网络安全操作的效率和有效性,并采取不同的策略。在网络安全领域,开发新的入侵检测系统(IDS)以应对这些威胁的重要性已经显现。目前,这些系统大多基于机器学习。但这些系统需要高质量的数据来 "学习 "恶意流量的特征。这种数据集很难获得,因此很少有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

LSPR23: A novel IDS dataset from the largest live-fire cybersecurity exercise

LSPR23: A novel IDS dataset from the largest live-fire cybersecurity exercise

Cybersecurity threats are constantly evolving and becoming increasingly sophisticated, automated, adaptive, and intelligent. This makes it difficult for organizations to defend their digital assets. Industry professionals are looking for solutions to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of cybersecurity operations, adopting different strategies. In cybersecurity, the importance of developing new intrusion detection systems (IDSs) to address these threats has emerged. Most of these systems today are based on machine learning. But these systems need high-quality data to “learn” the characteristics of malicious traffic. Such datasets are difficult to obtain and therefore rarely available.

This paper advances the state of the art and presents a new high-quality IDS dataset. The dataset originates from Locked Shields, one of the world’s most extensive live-fire cyber defense exercises. This ensures that (i) it contains realistic behavior of attackers and defenders; (ii) it contains sophisticated attacks; and (iii) it contains labels, as the actions of the attackers are well-documented.

The dataset includes approximately 16 million network flows, [F3] of which approximately 1.6 million were labeled malicious. What is unique about this dataset is the use of a new labeling technique that increases the accuracy level of data labeling.

We evaluate the robustness of our dataset using both quantitative and qualitative methodologies. We begin with a quantitative examination of the Suricata IDS alerts based on signatures and anomalies. Subsequently, we assess the reproducibility of machine learning experiments conducted by Känzig et al., who used a private Locked Shields dataset. We also apply the quality criteria outlined by the evaluation framework proposed by Gharib et al.

Using our dataset with an existing classifier, we demonstrate comparable results (F1 score of 0.997) to the original paper where the classifier was evaluated on a private dataset (F1 score of 0.984)

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Information Security and Applications
Journal of Information Security and Applications Computer Science-Computer Networks and Communications
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
5.40%
发文量
206
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Information Security and Applications (JISA) focuses on the original research and practice-driven applications with relevance to information security and applications. JISA provides a common linkage between a vibrant scientific and research community and industry professionals by offering a clear view on modern problems and challenges in information security, as well as identifying promising scientific and "best-practice" solutions. JISA issues offer a balance between original research work and innovative industrial approaches by internationally renowned information security experts and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信