伊朗三叠纪晚期珊瑚礁中的生物侵蚀和结壳现象

IF 1.8 3区 地球科学 Q1 GEOLOGY
Facies Pub Date : 2024-08-07 DOI:10.1007/s10347-024-00687-w
Michelle Burger, Danijela Dimitrijević, Wolfgang Kiessling
{"title":"伊朗三叠纪晚期珊瑚礁中的生物侵蚀和结壳现象","authors":"Michelle Burger, Danijela Dimitrijević, Wolfgang Kiessling","doi":"10.1007/s10347-024-00687-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Hard substrate communities can impact coral reef growth by adding or removing calcium carbonate when they act as encrusters or bioeroders, respectively. Although such sclerobiont communities are known across the Phanerozoic, the Triassic saw a substantial increase in reef macrobioerosion. This study provides the first quantitative assessment of sclerobionts in a Late Triassic (Norian) reef coral community (from the Nayband Formation in central Iran) and establishes some post-Paleozoic trends in reef bioerosion. Sclerobionts were common on the dominant coral <i>Pamiroseris rectilamellosa</i> and covered between 0 and 26.4% of total coral surface area among the 145 colonies investigated. Encrustation was significantly more prevalent (1.78% of total area) than bioerosion (0.36% of total area). The underside of corals was 3.5 times more affected by sclerobionts than the upper surfaces. This suggests that the sclerobionts preferentially colonized dead parts of the corals. The main encrusting taxa were polychaete worms (76.2%), followed by bivalves (11.9%). The main bioeroders were Polychaeta (51.4%), Porifera (22.2%), and Bivalvia (20.7%). The lack of a correlation between encrustation and bioerosion intensity suggests that the number of sclerobionts is not simply a function of exposure time before final burial. Our review of the published literature suggests a declining trend in the relative importance of bivalves, polychaetes and cirripeds in reefs, whereas sponges increased in importance from the Triassic until today.</p>","PeriodicalId":51050,"journal":{"name":"Facies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bioerosion and encrustation in late triassic reef corals from Iran\",\"authors\":\"Michelle Burger, Danijela Dimitrijević, Wolfgang Kiessling\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10347-024-00687-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Hard substrate communities can impact coral reef growth by adding or removing calcium carbonate when they act as encrusters or bioeroders, respectively. Although such sclerobiont communities are known across the Phanerozoic, the Triassic saw a substantial increase in reef macrobioerosion. This study provides the first quantitative assessment of sclerobionts in a Late Triassic (Norian) reef coral community (from the Nayband Formation in central Iran) and establishes some post-Paleozoic trends in reef bioerosion. Sclerobionts were common on the dominant coral <i>Pamiroseris rectilamellosa</i> and covered between 0 and 26.4% of total coral surface area among the 145 colonies investigated. Encrustation was significantly more prevalent (1.78% of total area) than bioerosion (0.36% of total area). The underside of corals was 3.5 times more affected by sclerobionts than the upper surfaces. This suggests that the sclerobionts preferentially colonized dead parts of the corals. The main encrusting taxa were polychaete worms (76.2%), followed by bivalves (11.9%). The main bioeroders were Polychaeta (51.4%), Porifera (22.2%), and Bivalvia (20.7%). The lack of a correlation between encrustation and bioerosion intensity suggests that the number of sclerobionts is not simply a function of exposure time before final burial. Our review of the published literature suggests a declining trend in the relative importance of bivalves, polychaetes and cirripeds in reefs, whereas sponges increased in importance from the Triassic until today.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51050,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Facies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Facies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10347-024-00687-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Facies","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10347-024-00687-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

硬质基底群落可通过增加或移除碳酸钙来影响珊瑚礁的生长,它们可分别充当增殖体或生物寄生体。虽然这种硬质底物群落在整个新生代都为人所知,但在三叠纪,珊瑚礁的大型生物侵蚀显著增加。本研究首次对一个晚三叠世(纪)珊瑚礁珊瑚群落(取自伊朗中部的奈班德地层)中的硬毛菌进行了定量评估,并确定了珊瑚礁生物侵蚀的一些后古生代趋势。在所调查的 145 个珊瑚群中,硬壳虫在主要珊瑚 Pamiroseris rectilamellosa 上很常见,占珊瑚总表面积的 0% 到 26.4%。结壳现象(占总面积的 1.78%)明显多于生物侵蚀(占总面积的 0.36%)。珊瑚底部受硬壳菌影响的程度是上表面的 3.5 倍。这表明,硬壳虫更喜欢在珊瑚的死亡部分定居。主要的包壳类群是多毛类蠕虫(76.2%),其次是双壳类动物(11.9%)。主要的生物寄生类群是多毛类(51.4%)、多孔类(22.2%)和双壳类(20.7%)。结壳与生物侵蚀强度之间缺乏相关性,这表明硬壳虫的数量不仅仅是最终掩埋前暴露时间的函数。我们对已发表文献的回顾表明,双壳类、多毛类和圈足类在珊瑚礁中的相对重要性呈下降趋势,而海绵类的重要性从三叠纪至今一直在增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Bioerosion and encrustation in late triassic reef corals from Iran

Bioerosion and encrustation in late triassic reef corals from Iran

Hard substrate communities can impact coral reef growth by adding or removing calcium carbonate when they act as encrusters or bioeroders, respectively. Although such sclerobiont communities are known across the Phanerozoic, the Triassic saw a substantial increase in reef macrobioerosion. This study provides the first quantitative assessment of sclerobionts in a Late Triassic (Norian) reef coral community (from the Nayband Formation in central Iran) and establishes some post-Paleozoic trends in reef bioerosion. Sclerobionts were common on the dominant coral Pamiroseris rectilamellosa and covered between 0 and 26.4% of total coral surface area among the 145 colonies investigated. Encrustation was significantly more prevalent (1.78% of total area) than bioerosion (0.36% of total area). The underside of corals was 3.5 times more affected by sclerobionts than the upper surfaces. This suggests that the sclerobionts preferentially colonized dead parts of the corals. The main encrusting taxa were polychaete worms (76.2%), followed by bivalves (11.9%). The main bioeroders were Polychaeta (51.4%), Porifera (22.2%), and Bivalvia (20.7%). The lack of a correlation between encrustation and bioerosion intensity suggests that the number of sclerobionts is not simply a function of exposure time before final burial. Our review of the published literature suggests a declining trend in the relative importance of bivalves, polychaetes and cirripeds in reefs, whereas sponges increased in importance from the Triassic until today.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Facies
Facies 地学-地质学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
15
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal is open to papers dealing with the interpretation of ancient and modern biotopes and carbonate depositional environments by means of facies analysis in its broadest sense. Once the central part of research in hydrocarbon exploration, facies analysis more and more integrates modern and ancient biogeological processes of a changing earth. Special emphasis is laid on paleobiology and -ecology, basin evolution, sedimentology including diagenesis and geochemistry, as well as studies emphasising the impact of life on earth history. The main part of the target group will be people in academia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信