利用标准互动和 TOPSIS 排序的模糊 MCDM 方法进行信用评级预测

IF 4.4 3区 管理学 Q1 OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
Petr Hajek, Jean-Michel Sahut, Vladimir Olej
{"title":"利用标准互动和 TOPSIS 排序的模糊 MCDM 方法进行信用评级预测","authors":"Petr Hajek, Jean-Michel Sahut, Vladimir Olej","doi":"10.1007/s10479-024-06183-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) provides effective methods for dealing with the challenge of sorting credit ratings. This paper presents a novel data-driven MCDM sorting approach to predicting credit ratings. Our methodology combines the fuzzy TOPSIS-Sort-C model with the fuzzy best-worst approach, supported by a fuzzy cognitive map, to effectively deal with criteria interactions. This approach provides a corporate credit risk assessment, taking into account the uncertainties in credit risk assessment and relevance of its criteria by using fuzzy <i>c</i>-means and correlation-based feature selection. Our empirical analysis of 1138 US companies demonstrates the reliability of our model in dealing with a range of financial and non-financial indicators. The results demonstrate the potential of our methodology in credit rating assessment, with a good predictive performance relative to existing models.</p>","PeriodicalId":8215,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Operations Research","volume":"89 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Credit rating prediction using a fuzzy MCDM approach with criteria interactions and TOPSIS sorting\",\"authors\":\"Petr Hajek, Jean-Michel Sahut, Vladimir Olej\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10479-024-06183-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) provides effective methods for dealing with the challenge of sorting credit ratings. This paper presents a novel data-driven MCDM sorting approach to predicting credit ratings. Our methodology combines the fuzzy TOPSIS-Sort-C model with the fuzzy best-worst approach, supported by a fuzzy cognitive map, to effectively deal with criteria interactions. This approach provides a corporate credit risk assessment, taking into account the uncertainties in credit risk assessment and relevance of its criteria by using fuzzy <i>c</i>-means and correlation-based feature selection. Our empirical analysis of 1138 US companies demonstrates the reliability of our model in dealing with a range of financial and non-financial indicators. The results demonstrate the potential of our methodology in credit rating assessment, with a good predictive performance relative to existing models.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8215,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Operations Research\",\"volume\":\"89 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Operations Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-024-06183-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Operations Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-024-06183-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多标准决策(MCDM)为应对信用评级排序的挑战提供了有效的方法。本文提出了一种新颖的数据驱动 MCDM 排序方法来预测信用评级。我们的方法结合了模糊 TOPSIS-Sort-C 模型和模糊最佳-最差方法,并辅以模糊认知图,从而有效地处理了标准之间的相互作用。这种方法考虑到了信用风险评估中的不确定性,并通过使用模糊 c-means 和基于相关性的特征选择,提供了一种企业信用风险评估方法。我们对 1138 家美国公司进行了实证分析,证明了我们的模型在处理一系列财务和非财务指标时的可靠性。结果证明了我们的方法在信用评级评估中的潜力,与现有模型相比具有良好的预测性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Credit rating prediction using a fuzzy MCDM approach with criteria interactions and TOPSIS sorting

Credit rating prediction using a fuzzy MCDM approach with criteria interactions and TOPSIS sorting

Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) provides effective methods for dealing with the challenge of sorting credit ratings. This paper presents a novel data-driven MCDM sorting approach to predicting credit ratings. Our methodology combines the fuzzy TOPSIS-Sort-C model with the fuzzy best-worst approach, supported by a fuzzy cognitive map, to effectively deal with criteria interactions. This approach provides a corporate credit risk assessment, taking into account the uncertainties in credit risk assessment and relevance of its criteria by using fuzzy c-means and correlation-based feature selection. Our empirical analysis of 1138 US companies demonstrates the reliability of our model in dealing with a range of financial and non-financial indicators. The results demonstrate the potential of our methodology in credit rating assessment, with a good predictive performance relative to existing models.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Operations Research
Annals of Operations Research 管理科学-运筹学与管理科学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
596
审稿时长
8.4 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Operations Research publishes peer-reviewed original articles dealing with key aspects of operations research, including theory, practice, and computation. The journal publishes full-length research articles, short notes, expositions and surveys, reports on computational studies, and case studies that present new and innovative practical applications. In addition to regular issues, the journal publishes periodic special volumes that focus on defined fields of operations research, ranging from the highly theoretical to the algorithmic and the applied. These volumes have one or more Guest Editors who are responsible for collecting the papers and overseeing the refereeing process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信