全场晶体塑性模拟与同步加速器实验的比较:错误预测的详细调查

IF 2.4 3区 材料科学 Q3 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING
Nikhil Prabhu, Martin Diehl
{"title":"全场晶体塑性模拟与同步加速器实验的比较:错误预测的详细调查","authors":"Nikhil Prabhu, Martin Diehl","doi":"10.1007/s40192-024-00359-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Crystal plasticity-based digital twins are an alternative to expensive and time-consuming experiments for the investigation of micro-mechanical material behavior. However, before using simulations as an alternative for experiments, the capabilities and limitations of the modeling approach need to be known. This is best done by juxtaposing the predictions of digital twins against experimental data. The present work assesses the capabilities of full-field crystal plasticity simulations in an additively manufactured (AM) nickel-based superalloy that was characterized in situ by high-energy X-ray diffraction microscopy and electron backscatter diffraction as part of challenge 4 of air force research laboratory’s AM modeling challenge series. To ensure that the grains of interest are initialized with the measured eigenstrains, a novel scheme is proposed and its performance is evaluated. The overall agreement between simulation and experiment is assessed and compared to previous studies using the same dataset and aspects for which a systematic disagreement is seen are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":13604,"journal":{"name":"Integrating Materials and Manufacturing Innovation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Full-Field Crystal Plasticity Simulations to Synchrotron Experiments: Detailed Investigation of Mispredictions\",\"authors\":\"Nikhil Prabhu, Martin Diehl\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40192-024-00359-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Crystal plasticity-based digital twins are an alternative to expensive and time-consuming experiments for the investigation of micro-mechanical material behavior. However, before using simulations as an alternative for experiments, the capabilities and limitations of the modeling approach need to be known. This is best done by juxtaposing the predictions of digital twins against experimental data. The present work assesses the capabilities of full-field crystal plasticity simulations in an additively manufactured (AM) nickel-based superalloy that was characterized in situ by high-energy X-ray diffraction microscopy and electron backscatter diffraction as part of challenge 4 of air force research laboratory’s AM modeling challenge series. To ensure that the grains of interest are initialized with the measured eigenstrains, a novel scheme is proposed and its performance is evaluated. The overall agreement between simulation and experiment is assessed and compared to previous studies using the same dataset and aspects for which a systematic disagreement is seen are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13604,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Integrating Materials and Manufacturing Innovation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Integrating Materials and Manufacturing Innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40192-024-00359-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrating Materials and Manufacturing Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40192-024-00359-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于晶体塑性的数字孪晶是研究微观机械材料行为的昂贵而耗时的实验的替代方案。然而,在使用模拟替代实验之前,需要了解建模方法的能力和局限性。最好的办法是将数字孪生预测与实验数据进行对比。本研究评估了全场晶体塑性模拟在加法制造(AM)镍基超合金中的能力,该超合金是通过高能 X 射线衍射显微镜和电子反向散射衍射进行现场表征的,是空军研究实验室 AM 建模挑战系列赛挑战 4 的一部分。为确保相关晶粒根据测量的特征应变进行初始化,提出了一种新方案并对其性能进行了评估。评估了模拟与实验之间的整体一致性,并与之前使用相同数据集进行的研究进行了比较,讨论了存在系统性分歧的方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparison of Full-Field Crystal Plasticity Simulations to Synchrotron Experiments: Detailed Investigation of Mispredictions

Comparison of Full-Field Crystal Plasticity Simulations to Synchrotron Experiments: Detailed Investigation of Mispredictions

Crystal plasticity-based digital twins are an alternative to expensive and time-consuming experiments for the investigation of micro-mechanical material behavior. However, before using simulations as an alternative for experiments, the capabilities and limitations of the modeling approach need to be known. This is best done by juxtaposing the predictions of digital twins against experimental data. The present work assesses the capabilities of full-field crystal plasticity simulations in an additively manufactured (AM) nickel-based superalloy that was characterized in situ by high-energy X-ray diffraction microscopy and electron backscatter diffraction as part of challenge 4 of air force research laboratory’s AM modeling challenge series. To ensure that the grains of interest are initialized with the measured eigenstrains, a novel scheme is proposed and its performance is evaluated. The overall agreement between simulation and experiment is assessed and compared to previous studies using the same dataset and aspects for which a systematic disagreement is seen are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Integrating Materials and Manufacturing Innovation
Integrating Materials and Manufacturing Innovation Engineering-Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
42
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: The journal will publish: Research that supports building a model-based definition of materials and processes that is compatible with model-based engineering design processes and multidisciplinary design optimization; Descriptions of novel experimental or computational tools or data analysis techniques, and their application, that are to be used for ICME; Best practices in verification and validation of computational tools, sensitivity analysis, uncertainty quantification, and data management, as well as standards and protocols for software integration and exchange of data; In-depth descriptions of data, databases, and database tools; Detailed case studies on efforts, and their impact, that integrate experiment and computation to solve an enduring engineering problem in materials and manufacturing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信