平衡效率与平等:拍卖设计与群体公平问题

Fengjuan Jia, Mengxiao Zhang, Jiamou Liu, Bakh Khoussainov
{"title":"平衡效率与平等:拍卖设计与群体公平问题","authors":"Fengjuan Jia, Mengxiao Zhang, Jiamou Liu, Bakh Khoussainov","doi":"arxiv-2408.04545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The issue of fairness in AI arises from discriminatory practices in\napplications like job recommendations and risk assessments, emphasising the\nneed for algorithms that do not discriminate based on group characteristics.\nThis concern is also pertinent to auctions, commonly used for resource\nallocation, which necessitate fairness considerations. Our study examines\nauctions with groups distinguished by specific attributes, seeking to (1)\ndefine a fairness notion that ensures equitable treatment for all, (2) identify\nmechanisms that adhere to this fairness while preserving incentive\ncompatibility, and (3) explore the balance between fairness and seller's\nrevenue. We introduce two fairness notions-group fairness and individual\nfairness-and propose two corresponding auction mechanisms: the Group\nProbability Mechanism, which meets group fairness and incentive criteria, and\nthe Group Score Mechanism, which also encompasses individual fairness. Through\nexperiments, we validate these mechanisms' effectiveness in promoting fairness\nand examine their implications for seller revenue.","PeriodicalId":501316,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Computer Science and Game Theory","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Balancing Efficiency with Equality: Auction Design with Group Fairness Concerns\",\"authors\":\"Fengjuan Jia, Mengxiao Zhang, Jiamou Liu, Bakh Khoussainov\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2408.04545\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The issue of fairness in AI arises from discriminatory practices in\\napplications like job recommendations and risk assessments, emphasising the\\nneed for algorithms that do not discriminate based on group characteristics.\\nThis concern is also pertinent to auctions, commonly used for resource\\nallocation, which necessitate fairness considerations. Our study examines\\nauctions with groups distinguished by specific attributes, seeking to (1)\\ndefine a fairness notion that ensures equitable treatment for all, (2) identify\\nmechanisms that adhere to this fairness while preserving incentive\\ncompatibility, and (3) explore the balance between fairness and seller's\\nrevenue. We introduce two fairness notions-group fairness and individual\\nfairness-and propose two corresponding auction mechanisms: the Group\\nProbability Mechanism, which meets group fairness and incentive criteria, and\\nthe Group Score Mechanism, which also encompasses individual fairness. Through\\nexperiments, we validate these mechanisms' effectiveness in promoting fairness\\nand examine their implications for seller revenue.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501316,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - CS - Computer Science and Game Theory\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - CS - Computer Science and Game Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.04545\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Computer Science and Game Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.04545","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人工智能中的公平性问题源于工作推荐和风险评估等应用中的歧视性做法,这强调了不基于群体特征进行歧视的算法的必要性。我们的研究考察了以特定属性区分群体的拍卖,力求:(1)定义一种公平概念,确保所有人都能得到公平对待;(2)确定既能遵守这种公平性,又能保持激励相容性的机制;(3)探索公平性与卖方收益之间的平衡。我们引入了两种公平概念--群体公平和个人公平,并提出了两种相应的拍卖机制:群体概率机制和群体分数机制,前者符合群体公平和激励标准,后者也包含个人公平。通过实验,我们验证了这些机制在促进公平方面的有效性,并研究了它们对卖家收入的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Balancing Efficiency with Equality: Auction Design with Group Fairness Concerns
The issue of fairness in AI arises from discriminatory practices in applications like job recommendations and risk assessments, emphasising the need for algorithms that do not discriminate based on group characteristics. This concern is also pertinent to auctions, commonly used for resource allocation, which necessitate fairness considerations. Our study examines auctions with groups distinguished by specific attributes, seeking to (1) define a fairness notion that ensures equitable treatment for all, (2) identify mechanisms that adhere to this fairness while preserving incentive compatibility, and (3) explore the balance between fairness and seller's revenue. We introduce two fairness notions-group fairness and individual fairness-and propose two corresponding auction mechanisms: the Group Probability Mechanism, which meets group fairness and incentive criteria, and the Group Score Mechanism, which also encompasses individual fairness. Through experiments, we validate these mechanisms' effectiveness in promoting fairness and examine their implications for seller revenue.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信