英国殖民后期塞浦路斯的 "承认功绩

IF 1.9 2区 社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Maria Hadjiathanasiou
{"title":"英国殖民后期塞浦路斯的 \"承认功绩","authors":"Maria Hadjiathanasiou","doi":"10.1177/00108367241263288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"By interrogating the role of status symbols in Britain’s (de)colonial management practices, this article joins an emerging body of International Relation (IR) scholarship that conducts historical analyses of international status dynamics. Situated within the context of the age of the mid-20th century, at a time when empires were increasingly contested by their colonial subjects via near-simultaneous violent insurgency campaigns, this article aims to further our understanding on the (mis)use of imperial status symbols, using the case study of the British colony of Cyprus. Drawing upon unpublished material accessed via the Cyprus State Archives, the article reads this newly found material, such as Savingrams, Circulars and private correspondence between Empire officials in the metropole and the colony, to explore how Britain introduced several status symbols on its colonial subjects. The article argues that Britain did so, for a specific purpose, namely to maintain an informal empire as soon as ‘boots were off the ground’, by influencing and managing selected colonial subjects, thus safeguarding its imperial legacy. At the same time, the article investigates how these colonial subjects successfully leveraged the prospect of a lingering ‘British connection’, while simultaneously a large part of the Greek Cypriot community stood, and even fought, against this connection.","PeriodicalId":47286,"journal":{"name":"Cooperation and Conflict","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘Recognising Merit’ in late British colonial Cyprus\",\"authors\":\"Maria Hadjiathanasiou\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00108367241263288\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"By interrogating the role of status symbols in Britain’s (de)colonial management practices, this article joins an emerging body of International Relation (IR) scholarship that conducts historical analyses of international status dynamics. Situated within the context of the age of the mid-20th century, at a time when empires were increasingly contested by their colonial subjects via near-simultaneous violent insurgency campaigns, this article aims to further our understanding on the (mis)use of imperial status symbols, using the case study of the British colony of Cyprus. Drawing upon unpublished material accessed via the Cyprus State Archives, the article reads this newly found material, such as Savingrams, Circulars and private correspondence between Empire officials in the metropole and the colony, to explore how Britain introduced several status symbols on its colonial subjects. The article argues that Britain did so, for a specific purpose, namely to maintain an informal empire as soon as ‘boots were off the ground’, by influencing and managing selected colonial subjects, thus safeguarding its imperial legacy. At the same time, the article investigates how these colonial subjects successfully leveraged the prospect of a lingering ‘British connection’, while simultaneously a large part of the Greek Cypriot community stood, and even fought, against this connection.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47286,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cooperation and Conflict\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cooperation and Conflict\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00108367241263288\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cooperation and Conflict","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00108367241263288","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文通过探讨地位象征在英国(去)殖民管理实践中的作用,加入了对国际地位动态进行历史分析的新兴国际关系(IR)学术体系。20 世纪中叶,帝国通过近乎同时发生的暴力叛乱运动日益受到殖民地臣民的质疑,本文以这一时代为背景,旨在通过对英国殖民地塞浦路斯的案例研究,进一步加深我们对(滥用)帝国地位象征的理解。文章利用通过塞浦路斯国家档案馆获取的未公开材料,解读了这些新发现的材料,如 Savingrams、Circulars 以及帝国官员在都城和殖民地之间的私人信件,以探讨英国如何在其殖民地臣民身上引入若干身份象征。文章认为,英国这样做有其特定目的,即通过影响和管理选定的殖民地臣民,在 "靴子落地 "后立即维持一个非正式的帝国,从而保护其帝国遗产。同时,文章还研究了这些殖民地主体如何成功地利用了 "英国联系 "挥之不去的前景,而与此同时,大部分希族塞浦路斯人却站在甚至反对这种联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
‘Recognising Merit’ in late British colonial Cyprus
By interrogating the role of status symbols in Britain’s (de)colonial management practices, this article joins an emerging body of International Relation (IR) scholarship that conducts historical analyses of international status dynamics. Situated within the context of the age of the mid-20th century, at a time when empires were increasingly contested by their colonial subjects via near-simultaneous violent insurgency campaigns, this article aims to further our understanding on the (mis)use of imperial status symbols, using the case study of the British colony of Cyprus. Drawing upon unpublished material accessed via the Cyprus State Archives, the article reads this newly found material, such as Savingrams, Circulars and private correspondence between Empire officials in the metropole and the colony, to explore how Britain introduced several status symbols on its colonial subjects. The article argues that Britain did so, for a specific purpose, namely to maintain an informal empire as soon as ‘boots were off the ground’, by influencing and managing selected colonial subjects, thus safeguarding its imperial legacy. At the same time, the article investigates how these colonial subjects successfully leveraged the prospect of a lingering ‘British connection’, while simultaneously a large part of the Greek Cypriot community stood, and even fought, against this connection.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Published for over 40 years, the aim of Cooperation and Conflict is to promote research on and understanding of international relations. It believes in the deeds of academic pluralism and thus does not represent any specific methodology, approach, tradition or school. The mission of the journal is to meet the demands of the scholarly community having an interest in international studies (for details, see the statement "From the Editors" in Vol. 40, No. 3, September 2005). The editors especially encourage submissions contributing new knowledge of the field and welcome innovative, theory-aware and critical approaches. First preference will continue to be given to articles that have a Nordic and European focus. Cooperation and Conflict strictly adheres to a double-blind reviewing policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信