利用皮层内微刺激驱动人类自然人工触觉的仿生刺激模式

Taylor G Hobbs, Charles Greenspon, Ceci Verbaarschot, Giacomo Valle, Michael Boninger, Sliman J Bensmaia, Robert A Gaunt
{"title":"利用皮层内微刺激驱动人类自然人工触觉的仿生刺激模式","authors":"Taylor G Hobbs, Charles Greenspon, Ceci Verbaarschot, Giacomo Valle, Michael Boninger, Sliman J Bensmaia, Robert A Gaunt","doi":"10.1101/2024.07.31.24311276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective. Intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) of human somatosensory cortex evokes tactile percepts that people describe as originating from their own body, but are not always described as feeling natural. It remains unclear whether stimulation parameters such as amplitude, frequency, and spatiotemporal patterns across electrodes can be chosen to increase the naturalness of these artificial tactile percepts. Approach. In this study, we investigated whether biomimetic stimulation patterns — ICMS patterns that reproduce essential features of natural neural activity — increased the perceived naturalness of ICMS-evoked sensations compared to a non-biomimetic pattern in three people with cervical spinal cord injuries. All participants had electrode arrays implanted in their somatosensory cortices. Rather than qualitatively asking which pattern felt more natural, participants directly compared natural residual percepts, delivered by mechanical indentation on a sensate region of their hand, to artificial percepts evoked by ICMS and were asked whether linear non-biomimetic or biomimetic stimulation felt most like the mechanical indentation. Main Results. We show that simple biomimetic ICMS, which modulated the stimulation amplitude on a single electrode, was perceived as being more like a mechanical indentation reference on 32% of the electrodes. We also tested an advanced biomimetic stimulation scheme that captured more of the spatiotemporal dynamics of cortical activity using co-modulated stimulation amplitudes and frequencies across four electrodes. Here, ICMS felt more like the mechanical reference for 75% of the electrode groups. Finally, biomimetic stimulation required less stimulus charge than their non-biomimetic counterparts. Significance. We conclude that ICMS encoding schemes that mimic naturally occurring neural spatiotemporal activation patterns in somatosensory cortex feel more like an actual touch than non-biomimetic encoding schemes. This also suggests that using key elements of neuronal activity can be a useful conceptual guide to constrain the large stimulus parameter space when designing future stimulation strategies.","PeriodicalId":501367,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Neurology","volume":"86 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biomimetic stimulation patterns drive natural artificial touch percepts using intracortical microstimulation in humans\",\"authors\":\"Taylor G Hobbs, Charles Greenspon, Ceci Verbaarschot, Giacomo Valle, Michael Boninger, Sliman J Bensmaia, Robert A Gaunt\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.07.31.24311276\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective. Intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) of human somatosensory cortex evokes tactile percepts that people describe as originating from their own body, but are not always described as feeling natural. It remains unclear whether stimulation parameters such as amplitude, frequency, and spatiotemporal patterns across electrodes can be chosen to increase the naturalness of these artificial tactile percepts. Approach. In this study, we investigated whether biomimetic stimulation patterns — ICMS patterns that reproduce essential features of natural neural activity — increased the perceived naturalness of ICMS-evoked sensations compared to a non-biomimetic pattern in three people with cervical spinal cord injuries. All participants had electrode arrays implanted in their somatosensory cortices. Rather than qualitatively asking which pattern felt more natural, participants directly compared natural residual percepts, delivered by mechanical indentation on a sensate region of their hand, to artificial percepts evoked by ICMS and were asked whether linear non-biomimetic or biomimetic stimulation felt most like the mechanical indentation. Main Results. We show that simple biomimetic ICMS, which modulated the stimulation amplitude on a single electrode, was perceived as being more like a mechanical indentation reference on 32% of the electrodes. We also tested an advanced biomimetic stimulation scheme that captured more of the spatiotemporal dynamics of cortical activity using co-modulated stimulation amplitudes and frequencies across four electrodes. Here, ICMS felt more like the mechanical reference for 75% of the electrode groups. Finally, biomimetic stimulation required less stimulus charge than their non-biomimetic counterparts. Significance. We conclude that ICMS encoding schemes that mimic naturally occurring neural spatiotemporal activation patterns in somatosensory cortex feel more like an actual touch than non-biomimetic encoding schemes. This also suggests that using key elements of neuronal activity can be a useful conceptual guide to constrain the large stimulus parameter space when designing future stimulation strategies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501367,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Neurology\",\"volume\":\"86 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.31.24311276\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.31.24311276","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的。对人类体感皮层进行皮层内微刺激(ICMS)会唤起人们的触觉感知,人们会将这种感知描述为源自自己的身体,但这种感觉并不总是自然的。目前仍不清楚是否可以通过选择刺激参数(如振幅、频率和跨电极的时空模式)来提高这些人工触觉知觉的自然度。研究方法在这项研究中,我们研究了生物仿真刺激模式--再现自然神经活动基本特征的 ICMS 模式--与非生物仿真模式相比,是否能提高三名颈椎损伤患者对 ICMS 诱发感觉的自然感知。所有参与者的体感皮层都植入了电极阵列。参与者并不是定性地询问哪种模式感觉更自然,而是直接将机械压入手部感觉区域所产生的自然残留感知与 ICMS 诱发的人工感知进行比较,并询问线性非生物拟态刺激或生物拟态刺激的感觉是否最像机械压入。主要结果。我们发现,在 32% 的电极上,简单的生物仿真 ICMS(在单个电极上调节刺激幅度)被认为更像机械压痕参照物。我们还测试了一种先进的生物模拟刺激方案,该方案利用四个电极上共同调制的刺激幅度和频率,捕捉到了更多皮层活动的时空动态。在这里,75% 的电极组感觉 ICMS 更像是机械参考。最后,与非仿生刺激相比,仿生刺激所需的刺激电荷更少。意义重大。我们的结论是,与非仿生编码方案相比,模仿躯体感觉皮层自然发生的神经时空激活模式的 ICMS 编码方案感觉更像实际触摸。这也表明,在设计未来的刺激策略时,使用神经元活动的关键要素可以作为一种有用的概念指导,以限制庞大的刺激参数空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Biomimetic stimulation patterns drive natural artificial touch percepts using intracortical microstimulation in humans
Objective. Intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) of human somatosensory cortex evokes tactile percepts that people describe as originating from their own body, but are not always described as feeling natural. It remains unclear whether stimulation parameters such as amplitude, frequency, and spatiotemporal patterns across electrodes can be chosen to increase the naturalness of these artificial tactile percepts. Approach. In this study, we investigated whether biomimetic stimulation patterns — ICMS patterns that reproduce essential features of natural neural activity — increased the perceived naturalness of ICMS-evoked sensations compared to a non-biomimetic pattern in three people with cervical spinal cord injuries. All participants had electrode arrays implanted in their somatosensory cortices. Rather than qualitatively asking which pattern felt more natural, participants directly compared natural residual percepts, delivered by mechanical indentation on a sensate region of their hand, to artificial percepts evoked by ICMS and were asked whether linear non-biomimetic or biomimetic stimulation felt most like the mechanical indentation. Main Results. We show that simple biomimetic ICMS, which modulated the stimulation amplitude on a single electrode, was perceived as being more like a mechanical indentation reference on 32% of the electrodes. We also tested an advanced biomimetic stimulation scheme that captured more of the spatiotemporal dynamics of cortical activity using co-modulated stimulation amplitudes and frequencies across four electrodes. Here, ICMS felt more like the mechanical reference for 75% of the electrode groups. Finally, biomimetic stimulation required less stimulus charge than their non-biomimetic counterparts. Significance. We conclude that ICMS encoding schemes that mimic naturally occurring neural spatiotemporal activation patterns in somatosensory cortex feel more like an actual touch than non-biomimetic encoding schemes. This also suggests that using key elements of neuronal activity can be a useful conceptual guide to constrain the large stimulus parameter space when designing future stimulation strategies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信