使用验证工具调查入门级和高级学生在熵和热力学第二定律方面遇到的困难

Mary Jane Brundage, David E. Meltzer, Chandralekha Singh
{"title":"使用验证工具调查入门级和高级学生在熵和热力学第二定律方面遇到的困难","authors":"Mary Jane Brundage, David E. Meltzer, Chandralekha Singh","doi":"arxiv-2408.00944","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We use the Survey of Thermodynamic Processes and First and Second Laws-Long\n(STPFaSL-Long), a research-based survey instrument with 78 items at the level\nof introductory physics, to investigate introductory and advanced students'\ndifficulties with entropy and the second law of thermodynamics. We present\nanalysis of data from 12 different introductory and advanced physics classes at\nfour different higher education public institutions in the US in which the\nsurvey was administered in-person to more than 1000 students. We find that a\nwidespread unproductive tendency for introductory students to associate the\nproperties of entropy with those of energy leads to many errors based on an\nidea of \"conservation of entropy,\" in which entropy increases are always\nbalanced by equal entropy decreases. For many of the more advanced students\n(calculus-based and upper level), we detect a tendency to expect entropy\nincreases even in processes in which the entropy does not change. We observed a\nwidespread failure to correctly apply the relationship {\\Delta}S =\n{\\delta}Qreversible/T, either by using it for irreversible processes to which\nit does not apply, or by applying it incorrectly or completely neglecting it in\nreversible processes to which it does apply. We also noted that many\nintroductory students are simply not aware that total entropy must increase in\nany \"spontaneous\" heat transfer process. Students at all levels were very\nfrequently found to be confused that while net entropy (system + reservoir) in\nreversible isothermal processes does not change, the entropy of the working\nsubstance itself does indeed increase or decrease depending on whether the\nprocess is an expansion or compression. Our findings are broadly consistent\nwith prior research findings in this area, expanding upon them and revealing\npreviously unreported aspects of students' thinking.","PeriodicalId":501565,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - Physics Education","volume":"86 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating introductory and advanced students' difficulties with entropy and the second law of thermodynamics using a validated instrument\",\"authors\":\"Mary Jane Brundage, David E. Meltzer, Chandralekha Singh\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2408.00944\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We use the Survey of Thermodynamic Processes and First and Second Laws-Long\\n(STPFaSL-Long), a research-based survey instrument with 78 items at the level\\nof introductory physics, to investigate introductory and advanced students'\\ndifficulties with entropy and the second law of thermodynamics. We present\\nanalysis of data from 12 different introductory and advanced physics classes at\\nfour different higher education public institutions in the US in which the\\nsurvey was administered in-person to more than 1000 students. We find that a\\nwidespread unproductive tendency for introductory students to associate the\\nproperties of entropy with those of energy leads to many errors based on an\\nidea of \\\"conservation of entropy,\\\" in which entropy increases are always\\nbalanced by equal entropy decreases. For many of the more advanced students\\n(calculus-based and upper level), we detect a tendency to expect entropy\\nincreases even in processes in which the entropy does not change. We observed a\\nwidespread failure to correctly apply the relationship {\\\\Delta}S =\\n{\\\\delta}Qreversible/T, either by using it for irreversible processes to which\\nit does not apply, or by applying it incorrectly or completely neglecting it in\\nreversible processes to which it does apply. We also noted that many\\nintroductory students are simply not aware that total entropy must increase in\\nany \\\"spontaneous\\\" heat transfer process. Students at all levels were very\\nfrequently found to be confused that while net entropy (system + reservoir) in\\nreversible isothermal processes does not change, the entropy of the working\\nsubstance itself does indeed increase or decrease depending on whether the\\nprocess is an expansion or compression. Our findings are broadly consistent\\nwith prior research findings in this area, expanding upon them and revealing\\npreviously unreported aspects of students' thinking.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501565,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - PHYS - Physics Education\",\"volume\":\"86 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - PHYS - Physics Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.00944\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - Physics Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.00944","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们使用热力学过程及第一和第二定律调查--STPFaSL-Long(STPFaSL-Long)这一基于研究的调查工具(在物理入门阶段有 78 个项目)来调查入门级和高级班学生在熵和热力学第二定律方面遇到的困难。我们对美国四所公立高等教育机构的 12 个不同的物理入门班和进阶班的数据进行了分析,对 1000 多名学生进行了现场调查。我们发现,入门级学生普遍倾向于将熵的性质与能量的性质联系起来,这种非生产性的倾向导致了许多基于 "熵守恒 "观点的错误,在 "熵守恒 "观点中,熵的增加总是被等量的熵的减少所平衡。对于许多高年级学生(以微积分为基础的高年级学生),我们发现他们倾向于认为即使在熵不发生变化的过程中熵也会增加。我们发现学生普遍不能正确应用{\delta}S ={\delta}Q可逆/T的关系,要么将其用于不适用的不可逆过程,要么在适用的可逆过程中错误应用或完全忽略。我们还注意到,许多入门级学生根本不知道在任何 "自发 "热传递过程中总熵一定会增加。我们发现,各个年级的学生都经常混淆这样一个问题:虽然在可逆等温过程中净熵(系统+贮热器)不会发生变化,但工作物质本身的熵确实会增加或减少,这取决于该过程是膨胀还是压缩。我们的研究结果与之前在这一领域的研究结果基本一致,并在此基础上进行了扩展,揭示了之前未曾报道过的学生思维方面的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investigating introductory and advanced students' difficulties with entropy and the second law of thermodynamics using a validated instrument
We use the Survey of Thermodynamic Processes and First and Second Laws-Long (STPFaSL-Long), a research-based survey instrument with 78 items at the level of introductory physics, to investigate introductory and advanced students' difficulties with entropy and the second law of thermodynamics. We present analysis of data from 12 different introductory and advanced physics classes at four different higher education public institutions in the US in which the survey was administered in-person to more than 1000 students. We find that a widespread unproductive tendency for introductory students to associate the properties of entropy with those of energy leads to many errors based on an idea of "conservation of entropy," in which entropy increases are always balanced by equal entropy decreases. For many of the more advanced students (calculus-based and upper level), we detect a tendency to expect entropy increases even in processes in which the entropy does not change. We observed a widespread failure to correctly apply the relationship {\Delta}S = {\delta}Qreversible/T, either by using it for irreversible processes to which it does not apply, or by applying it incorrectly or completely neglecting it in reversible processes to which it does apply. We also noted that many introductory students are simply not aware that total entropy must increase in any "spontaneous" heat transfer process. Students at all levels were very frequently found to be confused that while net entropy (system + reservoir) in reversible isothermal processes does not change, the entropy of the working substance itself does indeed increase or decrease depending on whether the process is an expansion or compression. Our findings are broadly consistent with prior research findings in this area, expanding upon them and revealing previously unreported aspects of students' thinking.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信