合成人脸识别处理与自然人脸识别处理具有共同的机制

Kim Uittenhove, Hatef Otroshi Shahreza, Sébastien Marcel, Meike Ramon
{"title":"合成人脸识别处理与自然人脸识别处理具有共同的机制","authors":"Kim Uittenhove, Hatef Otroshi Shahreza, Sébastien Marcel, Meike Ramon","doi":"10.1101/2024.08.03.605972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent developments in generative AI offer the means to create synthetic identities, or deepfakes, at scale. As deepfake faces and voices become indistinguishable from real ones, they are considered as promising alternatives for research and development to enhance fairness and protect humans’ rights to privacy. Notwithstanding these efforts and intentions, a basic question remains unanswered: Are natural faces and facial deepfakes perceived and remembered in the same way? Using images created via professional photography on the one hand, and a state-of-the-art generative model on the other, we investigated the most studied process of face cognition: perceptual matching and discrimination of facial identity. Our results demonstrate that identity discrimination of natural <em>and</em> synthetic faces is governed by the same underlying perceptual mechanisms: objective stimulus similarity and observers’ ability level. These findings provide empirical support both for the societal risks associated with deepfakes, while also underscoring the utility of synthetic identities for research and development.","PeriodicalId":501210,"journal":{"name":"bioRxiv - Animal Behavior and Cognition","volume":"303 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Synthetic And Natural Face Identity Processing Share Common Mechanisms\",\"authors\":\"Kim Uittenhove, Hatef Otroshi Shahreza, Sébastien Marcel, Meike Ramon\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.08.03.605972\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recent developments in generative AI offer the means to create synthetic identities, or deepfakes, at scale. As deepfake faces and voices become indistinguishable from real ones, they are considered as promising alternatives for research and development to enhance fairness and protect humans’ rights to privacy. Notwithstanding these efforts and intentions, a basic question remains unanswered: Are natural faces and facial deepfakes perceived and remembered in the same way? Using images created via professional photography on the one hand, and a state-of-the-art generative model on the other, we investigated the most studied process of face cognition: perceptual matching and discrimination of facial identity. Our results demonstrate that identity discrimination of natural <em>and</em> synthetic faces is governed by the same underlying perceptual mechanisms: objective stimulus similarity and observers’ ability level. These findings provide empirical support both for the societal risks associated with deepfakes, while also underscoring the utility of synthetic identities for research and development.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"bioRxiv - Animal Behavior and Cognition\",\"volume\":\"303 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"bioRxiv - Animal Behavior and Cognition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.03.605972\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"bioRxiv - Animal Behavior and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.03.605972","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生成式人工智能的最新发展为大规模创建合成身份或深度假身份提供了手段。由于 "深度伪造 "的面孔和声音与真实的面孔和声音难以区分,它们被认为是研究和开发以提高公平性和保护人类隐私权的有前途的替代品。尽管有这些努力和意图,但一个基本问题仍未得到解答:自然面孔和面部深度伪造是否以同样的方式被感知和记忆?我们一方面使用专业摄影技术制作的图像,另一方面使用最先进的生成模型,研究了研究最多的人脸认知过程:人脸身份的感知匹配和辨别。我们的研究结果表明,自然面孔和合成面孔的身份辨别受相同的感知机制支配:客观刺激物的相似性和观察者的能力水平。这些发现为深度伪造所带来的社会风险提供了实证支持,同时也强调了合成身份在研究和开发中的实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Synthetic And Natural Face Identity Processing Share Common Mechanisms
Recent developments in generative AI offer the means to create synthetic identities, or deepfakes, at scale. As deepfake faces and voices become indistinguishable from real ones, they are considered as promising alternatives for research and development to enhance fairness and protect humans’ rights to privacy. Notwithstanding these efforts and intentions, a basic question remains unanswered: Are natural faces and facial deepfakes perceived and remembered in the same way? Using images created via professional photography on the one hand, and a state-of-the-art generative model on the other, we investigated the most studied process of face cognition: perceptual matching and discrimination of facial identity. Our results demonstrate that identity discrimination of natural and synthetic faces is governed by the same underlying perceptual mechanisms: objective stimulus similarity and observers’ ability level. These findings provide empirical support both for the societal risks associated with deepfakes, while also underscoring the utility of synthetic identities for research and development.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信