对尼日利亚比尔宁-凯比地区用作芒果果实人工催熟剂的灰分和大米片的物理性质和细胞毒性的比较评估

CD Obadiah, TO Yahaya, AA Aliero, M Abdulkareem
{"title":"对尼日利亚比尔宁-凯比地区用作芒果果实人工催熟剂的灰分和大米片的物理性质和细胞毒性的比较评估","authors":"CD Obadiah, TO Yahaya, AA Aliero, M Abdulkareem","doi":"arxiv-2408.01425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The high demand for mango (Mangifera indica L.) fruits has led sellers to\nemploy ripening agents. However, concerns are growing regarding the potential\ntoxicities of induced ripening, emphasizing the need for scientific\ninvestigation. Samples of artificially and naturally ripened mangoes were\nanalyzed for proximate composition using standard protocols. Cytogenotoxicity\nwas then assessed using the Allium cepa L. toxicity test. Twenty (20)A. cepa\n(onion) bulbs were used, with 5 ripened naturally, 5 with wood ash, 5 with\nherbaceous ash, and 5 with rice chips, all grown over tap water for five days.\nThe root tips of the bulbs were assayed and examined for chromosomal\naberrations. The results revealed a significant (P<0.05) increase in moisture,\nprotein, and ash content of mangoes as ripening agents were introduced. Mangoes\nripened with wood ash exhibited the highest moisture content (81%), while those\nripened with rice chips had the highest protein (0.5%) and ash content (1.5%).\nNaturally ripened mangoes displayed the highest fat (0.0095%) and fiber\n(11.46%) contents. The A. cepa toxicity test indicated significant (p<0.05)\ndifferences in the root growth of mangoes ripened with various agents. Wood ash\nresulted in the highest root growth (2.62cm), while herbaceous ash had the\nleast (2.18%). Chromosomal aberrations, including sticky, vagrant, and laggard\nabnormalities, were observed in all agents, with herbaceous ash exhibiting the\nhighest and rice chips the least. The obtained results suggest that induced\nripening of the fruits could induce toxicities, highlighting the necessity for\npublic awareness regarding the potential dangers posed by these agents.","PeriodicalId":501219,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - QuanBio - Other Quantitative Biology","volume":"74 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Evaluation of the Proximate and Cytogenotoxicity of Ash and Rice Chips Used as Mango Fruit Artificial Ripening Agents in Birnin Kebbi, Nigeria\",\"authors\":\"CD Obadiah, TO Yahaya, AA Aliero, M Abdulkareem\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2408.01425\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The high demand for mango (Mangifera indica L.) fruits has led sellers to\\nemploy ripening agents. However, concerns are growing regarding the potential\\ntoxicities of induced ripening, emphasizing the need for scientific\\ninvestigation. Samples of artificially and naturally ripened mangoes were\\nanalyzed for proximate composition using standard protocols. Cytogenotoxicity\\nwas then assessed using the Allium cepa L. toxicity test. Twenty (20)A. cepa\\n(onion) bulbs were used, with 5 ripened naturally, 5 with wood ash, 5 with\\nherbaceous ash, and 5 with rice chips, all grown over tap water for five days.\\nThe root tips of the bulbs were assayed and examined for chromosomal\\naberrations. The results revealed a significant (P<0.05) increase in moisture,\\nprotein, and ash content of mangoes as ripening agents were introduced. Mangoes\\nripened with wood ash exhibited the highest moisture content (81%), while those\\nripened with rice chips had the highest protein (0.5%) and ash content (1.5%).\\nNaturally ripened mangoes displayed the highest fat (0.0095%) and fiber\\n(11.46%) contents. The A. cepa toxicity test indicated significant (p<0.05)\\ndifferences in the root growth of mangoes ripened with various agents. Wood ash\\nresulted in the highest root growth (2.62cm), while herbaceous ash had the\\nleast (2.18%). Chromosomal aberrations, including sticky, vagrant, and laggard\\nabnormalities, were observed in all agents, with herbaceous ash exhibiting the\\nhighest and rice chips the least. The obtained results suggest that induced\\nripening of the fruits could induce toxicities, highlighting the necessity for\\npublic awareness regarding the potential dangers posed by these agents.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501219,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - QuanBio - Other Quantitative Biology\",\"volume\":\"74 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - QuanBio - Other Quantitative Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.01425\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - QuanBio - Other Quantitative Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.01425","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对芒果(Mangifera indica L.)水果的大量需求促使销售商使用催熟剂。然而,人们越来越担心催熟剂的潜在毒性,因此需要进行科学研究。采用标准方案对人工催熟和自然催熟的芒果样品进行近似成分分析。然后使用 Allium cepa L. 毒性试验评估了细胞遗传毒性。使用了 20 个洋葱鳞茎,其中 5 个自然成熟,5 个加入木灰,5 个加入草木灰,5 个加入米屑,所有鳞茎都在自来水中生长了 5 天。结果表明,加入催熟剂后,芒果的水分、蛋白质和灰分含量都有明显增加(P<0.05)。使用木灰催熟的芒果水分含量最高(81%),而使用米屑催熟的芒果蛋白质含量(0.5%)和灰分含量(1.5%)最高,自然催熟的芒果脂肪含量(0.0095%)和纤维含量(11.46%)最高。牛肝菌毒性试验表明,用各种药剂催熟的芒果根系生长差异显著(p<0.05)。木灰导致的根系生长最高(2.62 厘米),而草木灰导致的根系生长最低(2.18%)。在所有药剂中都观察到了染色体畸变,包括粘性、游离和滞后异常,其中草木灰的染色体畸变最高,米屑的染色体畸变最低。研究结果表明,诱导果实成熟可能会引起中毒,因此有必要提高公众对这些制剂潜在危险的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Evaluation of the Proximate and Cytogenotoxicity of Ash and Rice Chips Used as Mango Fruit Artificial Ripening Agents in Birnin Kebbi, Nigeria
The high demand for mango (Mangifera indica L.) fruits has led sellers to employ ripening agents. However, concerns are growing regarding the potential toxicities of induced ripening, emphasizing the need for scientific investigation. Samples of artificially and naturally ripened mangoes were analyzed for proximate composition using standard protocols. Cytogenotoxicity was then assessed using the Allium cepa L. toxicity test. Twenty (20)A. cepa (onion) bulbs were used, with 5 ripened naturally, 5 with wood ash, 5 with herbaceous ash, and 5 with rice chips, all grown over tap water for five days. The root tips of the bulbs were assayed and examined for chromosomal aberrations. The results revealed a significant (P<0.05) increase in moisture, protein, and ash content of mangoes as ripening agents were introduced. Mangoes ripened with wood ash exhibited the highest moisture content (81%), while those ripened with rice chips had the highest protein (0.5%) and ash content (1.5%). Naturally ripened mangoes displayed the highest fat (0.0095%) and fiber (11.46%) contents. The A. cepa toxicity test indicated significant (p<0.05) differences in the root growth of mangoes ripened with various agents. Wood ash resulted in the highest root growth (2.62cm), while herbaceous ash had the least (2.18%). Chromosomal aberrations, including sticky, vagrant, and laggard abnormalities, were observed in all agents, with herbaceous ash exhibiting the highest and rice chips the least. The obtained results suggest that induced ripening of the fruits could induce toxicities, highlighting the necessity for public awareness regarding the potential dangers posed by these agents.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信