NZYQ 和宪法文化

IF 0.7 Q2 LAW
Samuel Naylor
{"title":"NZYQ 和宪法文化","authors":"Samuel Naylor","doi":"10.1177/1037969x241269205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The political and social reaction to the High Court's decision in NZYQ is evidence of a deficit of constitutional culture in Australia: there has been a race to the bottom in public debate. This is against the background of the failed Voice referendum. Possible ways forward are discussed, and France is mentioned as counterpoint on the issue of constitutional culture.","PeriodicalId":44595,"journal":{"name":"Alternative Law Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"NZYQ and constitutional culture\",\"authors\":\"Samuel Naylor\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1037969x241269205\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The political and social reaction to the High Court's decision in NZYQ is evidence of a deficit of constitutional culture in Australia: there has been a race to the bottom in public debate. This is against the background of the failed Voice referendum. Possible ways forward are discussed, and France is mentioned as counterpoint on the issue of constitutional culture.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44595,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alternative Law Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alternative Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1037969x241269205\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alternative Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1037969x241269205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

高等法院对 NZYQ 一案的判决所引起的政治和社会反应证明了澳大利亚宪法文化的缺失:在公共辩论中出现了竞相逐低的现象。这是在 "声音 "公投失败的背景下发生的。我们讨论了可能的前进道路,并提到法国作为宪法文化问题的反面教材。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
NZYQ and constitutional culture
The political and social reaction to the High Court's decision in NZYQ is evidence of a deficit of constitutional culture in Australia: there has been a race to the bottom in public debate. This is against the background of the failed Voice referendum. Possible ways forward are discussed, and France is mentioned as counterpoint on the issue of constitutional culture.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信