刷尾负鼠(Trichosurus vulpecula)在饵料喂食器上支配达玛小袋鼠(Notamacropus eugenii)和贝内特小袋鼠(Notamacropus rufogriseus):对入侵物种管理的影响

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Graham J. Hickling, Tim D. Day
{"title":"刷尾负鼠(Trichosurus vulpecula)在饵料喂食器上支配达玛小袋鼠(Notamacropus eugenii)和贝内特小袋鼠(Notamacropus rufogriseus):对入侵物种管理的影响","authors":"Graham J. Hickling, Tim D. Day","doi":"10.1071/wr24016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<strong> Context</strong><p>Dama wallaby (<i>Notamacropus eugenii</i>) and Bennett’s wallaby (<i>N. rufogriseus</i>) are invasive pests on the New Zealand mainland and consequently are subject to ongoing control measures that include deployment of toxic baits in feeding stations.</p><strong> Aim</strong><p>We investigated whether behavioural interactions between wallabies and introduced brushtail possums (<i>Trichosurus vulpecula</i>) at bait feeders are likely to reduce the efficacy of this method for wallaby control.</p><strong> Methods</strong><p>Wallaby and possum visits and encounters at cereal bait feeders were monitored with trail cameras for several months in dama wallaby habitat near Rotorua, and in Bennett’s wallaby habitat in South Canterbury. The response of Bennett’s wallabies to possum carcases placed at feeders was also assessed.</p><strong> Key results</strong><p>The diurnal activity of wallabies and possums at the feeders overlapped extensively, although Bennett’s wallabies exhibited more daytime activity than the other two species. Thousands of visits by wallabies and possums were recorded but close encounters between the species at feeders were infrequent (<i>N</i> = 251). When encounters did occur, the wallaby was usually excluded from the feeder (72% of 229 encounters at Titoki Estate, near Rotorua, and 95% of 22 encounters at Blue Cliffs, South Canterbury) regardless of which species arrived at the feeder first. Zero instances of a wallaby excluding a possum from a feeder were recorded. When possum carcases were placed beside feeders, visitations by Bennett’s wallabies reduced significantly, by 86% during the first week when a possum carcase was present. This effect was short lived, however, because the carcase soon decayed or was scavenged by other wildlife.</p><strong> Conclusions</strong><p>Despite their smaller body size, possums are strongly behaviourally dominant over both wallaby species. Consequently, possums may empty feeders of bait before visiting wallabies have an opportunity to feed. Furthermore, interruption and exclusion of feeding wallabies by possums will increase the risk of sublethal toxic dosing and consequent bait shyness.</p><strong> Implications</strong><p>Since possums are common throughout most wallaby habitat in New Zealand, their dominance behaviour is likely to reduce the efficacy of bait feeder control of wallabies at many sites. Possum population suppression is, therefore, likely to increase the effectiveness of wallaby bait feeder programs but will be costly to achieve.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Brushtail possums (Trichosurus vulpecula) dominate dama wallabies (Notamacropus eugenii) and Bennett’s wallabies (Notamacropus rufogriseus) at bait feeders: implications for invasive species management\",\"authors\":\"Graham J. Hickling, Tim D. Day\",\"doi\":\"10.1071/wr24016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<strong> Context</strong><p>Dama wallaby (<i>Notamacropus eugenii</i>) and Bennett’s wallaby (<i>N. rufogriseus</i>) are invasive pests on the New Zealand mainland and consequently are subject to ongoing control measures that include deployment of toxic baits in feeding stations.</p><strong> Aim</strong><p>We investigated whether behavioural interactions between wallabies and introduced brushtail possums (<i>Trichosurus vulpecula</i>) at bait feeders are likely to reduce the efficacy of this method for wallaby control.</p><strong> Methods</strong><p>Wallaby and possum visits and encounters at cereal bait feeders were monitored with trail cameras for several months in dama wallaby habitat near Rotorua, and in Bennett’s wallaby habitat in South Canterbury. The response of Bennett’s wallabies to possum carcases placed at feeders was also assessed.</p><strong> Key results</strong><p>The diurnal activity of wallabies and possums at the feeders overlapped extensively, although Bennett’s wallabies exhibited more daytime activity than the other two species. Thousands of visits by wallabies and possums were recorded but close encounters between the species at feeders were infrequent (<i>N</i> = 251). When encounters did occur, the wallaby was usually excluded from the feeder (72% of 229 encounters at Titoki Estate, near Rotorua, and 95% of 22 encounters at Blue Cliffs, South Canterbury) regardless of which species arrived at the feeder first. Zero instances of a wallaby excluding a possum from a feeder were recorded. When possum carcases were placed beside feeders, visitations by Bennett’s wallabies reduced significantly, by 86% during the first week when a possum carcase was present. This effect was short lived, however, because the carcase soon decayed or was scavenged by other wildlife.</p><strong> Conclusions</strong><p>Despite their smaller body size, possums are strongly behaviourally dominant over both wallaby species. Consequently, possums may empty feeders of bait before visiting wallabies have an opportunity to feed. Furthermore, interruption and exclusion of feeding wallabies by possums will increase the risk of sublethal toxic dosing and consequent bait shyness.</p><strong> Implications</strong><p>Since possums are common throughout most wallaby habitat in New Zealand, their dominance behaviour is likely to reduce the efficacy of bait feeder control of wallabies at many sites. Possum population suppression is, therefore, likely to increase the effectiveness of wallaby bait feeder programs but will be costly to achieve.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1071/wr24016\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/wr24016","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景达玛小袋鼠(Notamacropus eugenii)和贝内特小袋鼠(N. rufogriseus)是新西兰大陆的入侵害虫,因此受到持续控制措施的影响,包括在喂食站投放有毒诱饵。目的我们研究了小袋鼠和引进的刷尾负鼠(Trichosurus vulpecula)在饵料饲喂站的行为互动是否会降低这种小袋鼠控制方法的效果。方法在罗托鲁瓦附近的达玛小袋鼠栖息地和南坎特伯雷的贝内特小袋鼠栖息地,用跟踪摄像机对小袋鼠和负鼠在谷物饵料喂食器的来访和相遇情况进行了几个月的监测。此外,还评估了贝内特小袋鼠对放置在喂食器上的负鼠尸体的反应。主要结果小袋鼠和负鼠在喂食器上的昼夜活动广泛重叠,但贝内特小袋鼠的白天活动比其他两种小袋鼠多。记录到的小袋鼠和负鼠来访次数数以千计,但这两个物种在喂食器上的亲密接触并不多见(N = 251)。当发生相遇时,小袋鼠通常会被排除在喂食器之外(在罗托鲁瓦附近的 Titoki Estate 的 229 次相遇中,72% 的小袋鼠被排除在喂食器之外;在南坎特伯雷的 Blue Cliffs 的 22 次相遇中,95% 的小袋鼠被排除在喂食器之外),无论哪个物种先到达喂食器。小袋鼠将负鼠排除在喂食器之外的情况记录为零。将负鼠尸体放在喂食器旁边时,贝内特小袋鼠的光顾次数明显减少,在有负鼠尸体的第一周减少了 86%。不过,这种效果持续时间很短,因为尸体很快就会腐烂或被其他野生动物吃掉。结论尽管负鼠的体型较小,但在行为上对两种袋鼠都具有很强的优势。因此,负鼠可能会在到访的小袋鼠有机会觅食之前就把喂食器中的饵料清空。此外,负鼠干扰和排斥小袋鼠觅食会增加亚致死毒性剂量的风险,从而导致小袋鼠对饵料害羞。影响由于负鼠在新西兰大多数小袋鼠栖息地都很常见,它们的优势行为很可能会降低许多地点用饵料饲喂器控制小袋鼠的效果。因此,抑制负鼠的数量可能会提高小袋鼠饵料饲喂器计划的效果,但实现这一目标的成本很高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Brushtail possums (Trichosurus vulpecula) dominate dama wallabies (Notamacropus eugenii) and Bennett’s wallabies (Notamacropus rufogriseus) at bait feeders: implications for invasive species management
Context

Dama wallaby (Notamacropus eugenii) and Bennett’s wallaby (N. rufogriseus) are invasive pests on the New Zealand mainland and consequently are subject to ongoing control measures that include deployment of toxic baits in feeding stations.

Aim

We investigated whether behavioural interactions between wallabies and introduced brushtail possums (Trichosurus vulpecula) at bait feeders are likely to reduce the efficacy of this method for wallaby control.

Methods

Wallaby and possum visits and encounters at cereal bait feeders were monitored with trail cameras for several months in dama wallaby habitat near Rotorua, and in Bennett’s wallaby habitat in South Canterbury. The response of Bennett’s wallabies to possum carcases placed at feeders was also assessed.

Key results

The diurnal activity of wallabies and possums at the feeders overlapped extensively, although Bennett’s wallabies exhibited more daytime activity than the other two species. Thousands of visits by wallabies and possums were recorded but close encounters between the species at feeders were infrequent (N = 251). When encounters did occur, the wallaby was usually excluded from the feeder (72% of 229 encounters at Titoki Estate, near Rotorua, and 95% of 22 encounters at Blue Cliffs, South Canterbury) regardless of which species arrived at the feeder first. Zero instances of a wallaby excluding a possum from a feeder were recorded. When possum carcases were placed beside feeders, visitations by Bennett’s wallabies reduced significantly, by 86% during the first week when a possum carcase was present. This effect was short lived, however, because the carcase soon decayed or was scavenged by other wildlife.

Conclusions

Despite their smaller body size, possums are strongly behaviourally dominant over both wallaby species. Consequently, possums may empty feeders of bait before visiting wallabies have an opportunity to feed. Furthermore, interruption and exclusion of feeding wallabies by possums will increase the risk of sublethal toxic dosing and consequent bait shyness.

Implications

Since possums are common throughout most wallaby habitat in New Zealand, their dominance behaviour is likely to reduce the efficacy of bait feeder control of wallabies at many sites. Possum population suppression is, therefore, likely to increase the effectiveness of wallaby bait feeder programs but will be costly to achieve.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信