在冰岛火星模拟环境中比较漫游车和直升机行星任务结构

IF 3.8 Q2 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Samantha Gwizd, Kathryn M. Stack, Raymond Francis, Fred Calef, Brett B. Carr, Chris Langley, Jamie Graff, þorsteinn Hanning Kristinsson, Vilhjálmur Páll Thorarensen, Eiríkur Bernharðsson, Michael Phillips, Matthew Varnam, Nathan Hadland, Jahnavi Shah, Jeffrey Moersch, Udit Basu, Joana R. C. Voigt and Christopher W. Hamilton
{"title":"在冰岛火星模拟环境中比较漫游车和直升机行星任务结构","authors":"Samantha Gwizd, Kathryn M. Stack, Raymond Francis, Fred Calef, Brett B. Carr, Chris Langley, Jamie Graff, þorsteinn Hanning Kristinsson, Vilhjálmur Páll Thorarensen, Eiríkur Bernharðsson, Michael Phillips, Matthew Varnam, Nathan Hadland, Jahnavi Shah, Jeffrey Moersch, Udit Basu, Joana R. C. Voigt and Christopher W. Hamilton","doi":"10.3847/psj/ad55f4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Rover–Aerial Vehicle Exploration Network project field-tested planetary mission operations within a Mars analog environment in Iceland using stand-alone rover and helicopter architectures. Mission planning, implementation, and results are reported for the rover mission and briefly summarized for the helicopter mission. The outcomes of both missions are subsequently compared. Field implementation occurred from 2022 July to August at the Holuhraun lava flow. The rover science operations team executed a 14 sol (Martian day) mission that achieved mission, science, and sampling goals, including the contextualization, acquisition, and planned caching of two eolian and two rock samples. The helicopter science operations team executed a plan of comparable length but emphasized different science goals given long-range flight capabilities and landing limitations. The resolution and targetability of the rover payload enabled more detailed analyses, whereas the helicopter was better able to map flow-scale morphologies. The rover’s exploration was limited by daily mobility duration limits and hazardous terrain, whereas the helicopter’s exploration was constrained by landing site hazards. Resource limitations resulted from lengthier rover drives and data-volume-intensive helicopter imaging surveys. Future missions using combined rover–helicopter architectures should account for each spacecraft’s resource needs and acknowledge system strengths in different geologic settings. Both missions served to establish operations strategies and mission outcomes to be applied to future combined rover and helicopter mission architectures, while the helicopter mission also evaluated strategies and outcomes for future stand-alone airborne missions. Findings in this work are relevant to future missions seeking to optimize strategies for planetary mission operations.","PeriodicalId":34524,"journal":{"name":"The Planetary Science Journal","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing Rover and Helicopter Planetary Mission Architectures in a Mars Analog Setting in Iceland\",\"authors\":\"Samantha Gwizd, Kathryn M. Stack, Raymond Francis, Fred Calef, Brett B. Carr, Chris Langley, Jamie Graff, þorsteinn Hanning Kristinsson, Vilhjálmur Páll Thorarensen, Eiríkur Bernharðsson, Michael Phillips, Matthew Varnam, Nathan Hadland, Jahnavi Shah, Jeffrey Moersch, Udit Basu, Joana R. C. Voigt and Christopher W. Hamilton\",\"doi\":\"10.3847/psj/ad55f4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Rover–Aerial Vehicle Exploration Network project field-tested planetary mission operations within a Mars analog environment in Iceland using stand-alone rover and helicopter architectures. Mission planning, implementation, and results are reported for the rover mission and briefly summarized for the helicopter mission. The outcomes of both missions are subsequently compared. Field implementation occurred from 2022 July to August at the Holuhraun lava flow. The rover science operations team executed a 14 sol (Martian day) mission that achieved mission, science, and sampling goals, including the contextualization, acquisition, and planned caching of two eolian and two rock samples. The helicopter science operations team executed a plan of comparable length but emphasized different science goals given long-range flight capabilities and landing limitations. The resolution and targetability of the rover payload enabled more detailed analyses, whereas the helicopter was better able to map flow-scale morphologies. The rover’s exploration was limited by daily mobility duration limits and hazardous terrain, whereas the helicopter’s exploration was constrained by landing site hazards. Resource limitations resulted from lengthier rover drives and data-volume-intensive helicopter imaging surveys. Future missions using combined rover–helicopter architectures should account for each spacecraft’s resource needs and acknowledge system strengths in different geologic settings. Both missions served to establish operations strategies and mission outcomes to be applied to future combined rover and helicopter mission architectures, while the helicopter mission also evaluated strategies and outcomes for future stand-alone airborne missions. Findings in this work are relevant to future missions seeking to optimize strategies for planetary mission operations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34524,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Planetary Science Journal\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Planetary Science Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3847/psj/ad55f4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Planetary Science Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3847/psj/ad55f4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

漫游者-航空飞行器探索网络项目利用独立的漫游者和直升机结构,在冰岛的火星模拟环境中实地测试了行星任务的运行情况。报告了漫游车任务的规划、实施和结果,并简要概述了直升机任务。随后对两次任务的结果进行了比较。实地实施工作于 2022 年 7 月至 8 月在霍鲁哈伦熔岩流进行。漫游车科学运行团队执行了 14 个火星日的任务,实现了任务、科学和采样目标,包括确定背景、获取和计划缓存两个风化样本和两个岩石样本。直升机科学作业小组执行了一个长度相当的计划,但考虑到远程飞行能力和着陆限制,强调了不同的科学目标。漫游车有效载荷的分辨率和目标性使其能够进行更详细的分析,而直升机则能够更好地绘制流动尺度的形态图。漫游车的探索受到每日机动时间限制和危险地形的限制,而直升机的探索则受到着陆点危险的限制。由于漫游车行驶时间较长和直升机成像勘测需要大量数据,因此资源有限。未来使用漫游车-直升机组合结构的任务应考虑每个航天器的资源需求,并承认系统在不同地质环境中的优势。这两项任务都是为了建立适用于未来漫游车和直升机联合任务架构的运行策略和任务成果,而直升机任务还评估了未来独立机载任务的策略和成果。这项工作的研究结果与寻求优化行星任务运行战略的未来任务相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing Rover and Helicopter Planetary Mission Architectures in a Mars Analog Setting in Iceland
The Rover–Aerial Vehicle Exploration Network project field-tested planetary mission operations within a Mars analog environment in Iceland using stand-alone rover and helicopter architectures. Mission planning, implementation, and results are reported for the rover mission and briefly summarized for the helicopter mission. The outcomes of both missions are subsequently compared. Field implementation occurred from 2022 July to August at the Holuhraun lava flow. The rover science operations team executed a 14 sol (Martian day) mission that achieved mission, science, and sampling goals, including the contextualization, acquisition, and planned caching of two eolian and two rock samples. The helicopter science operations team executed a plan of comparable length but emphasized different science goals given long-range flight capabilities and landing limitations. The resolution and targetability of the rover payload enabled more detailed analyses, whereas the helicopter was better able to map flow-scale morphologies. The rover’s exploration was limited by daily mobility duration limits and hazardous terrain, whereas the helicopter’s exploration was constrained by landing site hazards. Resource limitations resulted from lengthier rover drives and data-volume-intensive helicopter imaging surveys. Future missions using combined rover–helicopter architectures should account for each spacecraft’s resource needs and acknowledge system strengths in different geologic settings. Both missions served to establish operations strategies and mission outcomes to be applied to future combined rover and helicopter mission architectures, while the helicopter mission also evaluated strategies and outcomes for future stand-alone airborne missions. Findings in this work are relevant to future missions seeking to optimize strategies for planetary mission operations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
The Planetary Science Journal
The Planetary Science Journal Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geophysics
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
249
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信