探索 COVID-19 疫苗决策:来自 "一针见血的奇迹 "和 "疫苗狂热者 "的启示

3区 综合性期刊 Q1 Medicine
Josefina Nuñez Sahr, Angela M. Parcesepe, William You, Denis Nash, Kate Penrose, Milton Leonard Wainberg, Subha Balasubramanian, Bai Xi Jasmine Chan, Rachael Piltch-Loeb
{"title":"探索 COVID-19 疫苗决策:来自 \"一针见血的奇迹 \"和 \"疫苗狂热者 \"的启示","authors":"Josefina Nuñez Sahr, Angela M. Parcesepe, William You, Denis Nash, Kate Penrose, Milton Leonard Wainberg, Subha Balasubramanian, Bai Xi Jasmine Chan, Rachael Piltch-Loeb","doi":"10.3390/ijerph21081054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Within the USA, the uptake of the updated COVID-19 vaccines is suboptimal despite health authority recommendations. This study used qualitative methods to examine factors influencing COVID-19 vaccine decision making and the effects of anxiety and depression on these decisions within the CHASING COVID Cohort (C3). Between October and December 2023, we conducted 25 interviews with participants from 16 different US states, 14 of whom endorsed recent symptoms of anxiety and/or depression. Using grounded theory methodology for coding and thematic analysis, we categorized participants into “One-Shot Wonders” and “Booster Enthusiasts”. Our findings indicate that the US COVID-19 vaccination environment has shifted from active promotion to a notable absence of COVID-19 discussions, leading to reduced worry about infection and severe illness, diminished perception of the benefits of the vaccine on personal and community levels, and fewer cues to action. Initially influential factors like family, personal experiences, and physician recommendations lost impact over time. Although the relationship between symptoms of depression and anxiety and vaccination was not prominent, one case highlighted a direct relationship. The study emphasizes the importance of timely and accurate public health messaging adaptable to individuals’ needs and misconceptions, highlighting the need for dynamic communication strategies in future initiatives with rapidly changing landscapes.","PeriodicalId":14044,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health","volume":"84 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring COVID-19 Vaccine Decision Making: Insights from ‘One-Shot Wonders’ and ‘Booster Enthusiasts’\",\"authors\":\"Josefina Nuñez Sahr, Angela M. Parcesepe, William You, Denis Nash, Kate Penrose, Milton Leonard Wainberg, Subha Balasubramanian, Bai Xi Jasmine Chan, Rachael Piltch-Loeb\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/ijerph21081054\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Within the USA, the uptake of the updated COVID-19 vaccines is suboptimal despite health authority recommendations. This study used qualitative methods to examine factors influencing COVID-19 vaccine decision making and the effects of anxiety and depression on these decisions within the CHASING COVID Cohort (C3). Between October and December 2023, we conducted 25 interviews with participants from 16 different US states, 14 of whom endorsed recent symptoms of anxiety and/or depression. Using grounded theory methodology for coding and thematic analysis, we categorized participants into “One-Shot Wonders” and “Booster Enthusiasts”. Our findings indicate that the US COVID-19 vaccination environment has shifted from active promotion to a notable absence of COVID-19 discussions, leading to reduced worry about infection and severe illness, diminished perception of the benefits of the vaccine on personal and community levels, and fewer cues to action. Initially influential factors like family, personal experiences, and physician recommendations lost impact over time. Although the relationship between symptoms of depression and anxiety and vaccination was not prominent, one case highlighted a direct relationship. The study emphasizes the importance of timely and accurate public health messaging adaptable to individuals’ needs and misconceptions, highlighting the need for dynamic communication strategies in future initiatives with rapidly changing landscapes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14044,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health\",\"volume\":\"84 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21081054\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21081054","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在美国,尽管有卫生部门的建议,但最新的 COVID-19 疫苗的接种率并不理想。本研究采用定性方法研究了影响COVID-19疫苗决策的因素,以及焦虑和抑郁对CHASING COVID队列(C3)中这些决策的影响。2023 年 10 月至 12 月期间,我们对来自美国 16 个不同州的参与者进行了 25 次访谈,其中 14 人表示近期有焦虑和/或抑郁症状。利用基础理论方法进行编码和主题分析,我们将参与者分为 "一鸣惊人者 "和 "助推狂热者"。我们的研究结果表明,美国的 COVID-19 疫苗接种环境已经从积极推广转变为明显缺乏对 COVID-19 的讨论,这导致人们对感染和重病的担忧减少,对疫苗在个人和社区层面的益处的认识降低,行动的线索减少。随着时间的推移,家庭、个人经历和医生建议等最初的影响因素逐渐失去了作用。虽然抑郁和焦虑症状与接种疫苗之间的关系并不突出,但有一个病例突出显示了两者之间的直接关系。这项研究强调了根据个人需求和误解及时准确地传递公共卫生信息的重要性,并强调了在未来瞬息万变的环境中采取动态传播策略的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring COVID-19 Vaccine Decision Making: Insights from ‘One-Shot Wonders’ and ‘Booster Enthusiasts’
Within the USA, the uptake of the updated COVID-19 vaccines is suboptimal despite health authority recommendations. This study used qualitative methods to examine factors influencing COVID-19 vaccine decision making and the effects of anxiety and depression on these decisions within the CHASING COVID Cohort (C3). Between October and December 2023, we conducted 25 interviews with participants from 16 different US states, 14 of whom endorsed recent symptoms of anxiety and/or depression. Using grounded theory methodology for coding and thematic analysis, we categorized participants into “One-Shot Wonders” and “Booster Enthusiasts”. Our findings indicate that the US COVID-19 vaccination environment has shifted from active promotion to a notable absence of COVID-19 discussions, leading to reduced worry about infection and severe illness, diminished perception of the benefits of the vaccine on personal and community levels, and fewer cues to action. Initially influential factors like family, personal experiences, and physician recommendations lost impact over time. Although the relationship between symptoms of depression and anxiety and vaccination was not prominent, one case highlighted a direct relationship. The study emphasizes the importance of timely and accurate public health messaging adaptable to individuals’ needs and misconceptions, highlighting the need for dynamic communication strategies in future initiatives with rapidly changing landscapes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14422
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (IJERPH) (ISSN 1660-4601) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that publishes original articles, critical reviews, research notes, and short communications in the interdisciplinary area of environmental health sciences and public health. It links several scientific disciplines including biology, biochemistry, biotechnology, cellular and molecular biology, chemistry, computer science, ecology, engineering, epidemiology, genetics, immunology, microbiology, oncology, pathology, pharmacology, and toxicology, in an integrated fashion, to address critical issues related to environmental quality and public health. Therefore, IJERPH focuses on the publication of scientific and technical information on the impacts of natural phenomena and anthropogenic factors on the quality of our environment, the interrelationships between environmental health and the quality of life, as well as the socio-cultural, political, economic, and legal considerations related to environmental stewardship and public health. The 2018 IJERPH Outstanding Reviewer Award has been launched! This award acknowledge those who have generously dedicated their time to review manuscripts submitted to IJERPH. See full details at http://www.mdpi.com/journal/ijerph/awards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信