失败支持 3-6 岁儿童进行机械探索

IF 1.8 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
{"title":"失败支持 3-6 岁儿童进行机械探索","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.cogdev.2024.101485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study investigated whether contexts of failure improve preschool children’s mechanistic reasoning. We showed 3- to 6-year-old children (N = 55, <em>M</em> = 5;2) how to make an unfamiliar toy work to play a goal-directed game. Between conditions we manipulated children’s success in making the toy work by surreptitiously turning a hidden causal switch ON (Success) or OFF (Failure) before they interacted with the toy. We then measured children’s exploration of the toy, explanations for how the toy worked, and generalizations about how a new functioning toy would work. Children in the Failure condition were more likely to discover the hidden causal mechanism and talk about it in their explanations about the toy. Younger children spent more time exploring the toy than older children but were not more likely to discover the hidden causal mechanism. The findings are discussed as they relate to the emergence of spontaneous mechanistic exploration over development, how this then supports mechanistic reasoning, and the role of failure in children’s early causal reasoning.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51422,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Failure supports 3- to 6-year-old children’s mechanistic exploration\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cogdev.2024.101485\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study investigated whether contexts of failure improve preschool children’s mechanistic reasoning. We showed 3- to 6-year-old children (N = 55, <em>M</em> = 5;2) how to make an unfamiliar toy work to play a goal-directed game. Between conditions we manipulated children’s success in making the toy work by surreptitiously turning a hidden causal switch ON (Success) or OFF (Failure) before they interacted with the toy. We then measured children’s exploration of the toy, explanations for how the toy worked, and generalizations about how a new functioning toy would work. Children in the Failure condition were more likely to discover the hidden causal mechanism and talk about it in their explanations about the toy. Younger children spent more time exploring the toy than older children but were not more likely to discover the hidden causal mechanism. The findings are discussed as they relate to the emergence of spontaneous mechanistic exploration over development, how this then supports mechanistic reasoning, and the role of failure in children’s early causal reasoning.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognitive Development\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognitive Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885201424000704\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Development","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885201424000704","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了失败情境是否能提高学龄前儿童的机械推理能力。我们向 3 到 6 岁的儿童(人数=55,=5;2)演示了如何让一个陌生的玩具工作,以玩一个目标导向的游戏。在不同的条件下,我们通过在儿童与玩具互动之前偷偷打开一个隐藏的因果开关(成功)或关闭(失败),来操纵儿童使玩具工作的成功率。然后,我们测量了儿童对玩具的探索、对玩具工作原理的解释以及对新功能玩具工作原理的概括。在 "失败 "条件下,儿童更有可能发现隐藏的因果机制,并在解释玩具时谈论它。年龄较小的儿童比年龄较大的儿童花更多时间探索玩具,但发现隐藏因果机制的可能性并不大。本研究讨论了这些发现,因为它们与儿童在成长过程中出现的自发机械探索、这种探索如何支持机械推理以及失败在儿童早期因果推理中的作用有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Failure supports 3- to 6-year-old children’s mechanistic exploration

This study investigated whether contexts of failure improve preschool children’s mechanistic reasoning. We showed 3- to 6-year-old children (N = 55, M = 5;2) how to make an unfamiliar toy work to play a goal-directed game. Between conditions we manipulated children’s success in making the toy work by surreptitiously turning a hidden causal switch ON (Success) or OFF (Failure) before they interacted with the toy. We then measured children’s exploration of the toy, explanations for how the toy worked, and generalizations about how a new functioning toy would work. Children in the Failure condition were more likely to discover the hidden causal mechanism and talk about it in their explanations about the toy. Younger children spent more time exploring the toy than older children but were not more likely to discover the hidden causal mechanism. The findings are discussed as they relate to the emergence of spontaneous mechanistic exploration over development, how this then supports mechanistic reasoning, and the role of failure in children’s early causal reasoning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
114
期刊介绍: Cognitive Development contains the very best empirical and theoretical work on the development of perception, memory, language, concepts, thinking, problem solving, metacognition, and social cognition. Criteria for acceptance of articles will be: significance of the work to issues of current interest, substance of the argument, and clarity of expression. For purposes of publication in Cognitive Development, moral and social development will be considered part of cognitive development when they are related to the development of knowledge or thought processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信