{"title":"资源空间分布、拖网重叠和位置误差对疏浚效率估算的影响","authors":"Marcelo J. Kittlein , Juan Alberti","doi":"10.1016/j.fishres.2024.107138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Assessing the efficiency of fishing gears, i.e. the fraction of fish in the gear path that are caught and retained, is essential for providing reliable abundance estimates in the management of sedentary invertebrate fisheries. While various methods have been proposed for estimating gear efficiency from experiments, each approach has its strengths and weaknesses, influenced by factors such as resource distribution, tow overlap, and positional errors. In this study, we conducted simulations to gauge the accuracy and precision of four different methods commonly used for estimating gear efficiency and initial density in depletion experiments: Leslie-Davis, DeLury, Removal, and Patch; considering different spatial arrangements of resources, degrees of tow overlap, and positional inaccuracies. We followed designs used in depletion experiments conducted in the Patagonian scallop fishery, commonly employed in scallops and other sedentary species’ fisheries. Our findings reveal that the Patch model, which is specifically harnessed to account for the spatial impact of tows, outperforms the others in terms of accuracy and precision, provided there is no positional error. Estimation of initial density in the simulated depletion experiments showed a similar pattern than that for gear efficiency. The spatial distribution of scallops had no noticeable effect on the precision and bias of efficiency and intial density estimates for any of the models. This holds across all scenarios of spatial clustering and tow overlap. However, when high positional errors in tow locations are at play, the Patch model’s performance is comparable to the other methods. The study highlights the advantages of the Patch model, especially in light of the current availability of high-precision GPS systems that can accurately track tow locations. We also discuss why traditional models may be less suitable for sedentary benthic species, underscoring the importance of selecting appropriate methodologies for specific fishery management tasks.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50443,"journal":{"name":"Fisheries Research","volume":"279 ","pages":"Article 107138"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of resource spatial distribution, tow overlap, and positional error in the estimation of dredge efficiency\",\"authors\":\"Marcelo J. Kittlein , Juan Alberti\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fishres.2024.107138\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Assessing the efficiency of fishing gears, i.e. the fraction of fish in the gear path that are caught and retained, is essential for providing reliable abundance estimates in the management of sedentary invertebrate fisheries. While various methods have been proposed for estimating gear efficiency from experiments, each approach has its strengths and weaknesses, influenced by factors such as resource distribution, tow overlap, and positional errors. In this study, we conducted simulations to gauge the accuracy and precision of four different methods commonly used for estimating gear efficiency and initial density in depletion experiments: Leslie-Davis, DeLury, Removal, and Patch; considering different spatial arrangements of resources, degrees of tow overlap, and positional inaccuracies. We followed designs used in depletion experiments conducted in the Patagonian scallop fishery, commonly employed in scallops and other sedentary species’ fisheries. Our findings reveal that the Patch model, which is specifically harnessed to account for the spatial impact of tows, outperforms the others in terms of accuracy and precision, provided there is no positional error. Estimation of initial density in the simulated depletion experiments showed a similar pattern than that for gear efficiency. The spatial distribution of scallops had no noticeable effect on the precision and bias of efficiency and intial density estimates for any of the models. This holds across all scenarios of spatial clustering and tow overlap. However, when high positional errors in tow locations are at play, the Patch model’s performance is comparable to the other methods. The study highlights the advantages of the Patch model, especially in light of the current availability of high-precision GPS systems that can accurately track tow locations. We also discuss why traditional models may be less suitable for sedentary benthic species, underscoring the importance of selecting appropriate methodologies for specific fishery management tasks.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50443,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fisheries Research\",\"volume\":\"279 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107138\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fisheries Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165783624002029\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FISHERIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fisheries Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165783624002029","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effects of resource spatial distribution, tow overlap, and positional error in the estimation of dredge efficiency
Assessing the efficiency of fishing gears, i.e. the fraction of fish in the gear path that are caught and retained, is essential for providing reliable abundance estimates in the management of sedentary invertebrate fisheries. While various methods have been proposed for estimating gear efficiency from experiments, each approach has its strengths and weaknesses, influenced by factors such as resource distribution, tow overlap, and positional errors. In this study, we conducted simulations to gauge the accuracy and precision of four different methods commonly used for estimating gear efficiency and initial density in depletion experiments: Leslie-Davis, DeLury, Removal, and Patch; considering different spatial arrangements of resources, degrees of tow overlap, and positional inaccuracies. We followed designs used in depletion experiments conducted in the Patagonian scallop fishery, commonly employed in scallops and other sedentary species’ fisheries. Our findings reveal that the Patch model, which is specifically harnessed to account for the spatial impact of tows, outperforms the others in terms of accuracy and precision, provided there is no positional error. Estimation of initial density in the simulated depletion experiments showed a similar pattern than that for gear efficiency. The spatial distribution of scallops had no noticeable effect on the precision and bias of efficiency and intial density estimates for any of the models. This holds across all scenarios of spatial clustering and tow overlap. However, when high positional errors in tow locations are at play, the Patch model’s performance is comparable to the other methods. The study highlights the advantages of the Patch model, especially in light of the current availability of high-precision GPS systems that can accurately track tow locations. We also discuss why traditional models may be less suitable for sedentary benthic species, underscoring the importance of selecting appropriate methodologies for specific fishery management tasks.
期刊介绍:
This journal provides an international forum for the publication of papers in the areas of fisheries science, fishing technology, fisheries management and relevant socio-economics. The scope covers fisheries in salt, brackish and freshwater systems, and all aspects of associated ecology, environmental aspects of fisheries, and economics. Both theoretical and practical papers are acceptable, including laboratory and field experimental studies relevant to fisheries. Papers on the conservation of exploitable living resources are welcome. Review and Viewpoint articles are also published. As the specified areas inevitably impinge on and interrelate with each other, the approach of the journal is multidisciplinary, and authors are encouraged to emphasise the relevance of their own work to that of other disciplines. The journal is intended for fisheries scientists, biological oceanographers, gear technologists, economists, managers, administrators, policy makers and legislators.