检测老年人认知能力下降的自动语音分析

Lihe Huang, Hao Yang, Yiran Che, Jingjing Yang
{"title":"检测老年人认知能力下降的自动语音分析","authors":"Lihe Huang, Hao Yang, Yiran Che, Jingjing Yang","doi":"10.3389/fpubh.2024.1417966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Speech analysis has been expected to help as a screening tool for early detection of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and mild-cognitively impairment (MCI). Acoustic features and linguistic features are usually used in speech analysis. However, no studies have yet determined which type of features provides better screening effectiveness, especially in the large aging population of China.Firstly, to compare the screening effectiveness of acoustic features, linguistic features, and their combination using the same dataset. Secondly, to develop Chinese automated diagnosis model using self-collected natural discourse data obtained from native Chinese speakers.A total of 92 participants from communities in Shanghai, completed MoCA-B and a picture description task based on the Cookie Theft under the guidance of trained operators, and were divided into three groups including AD, MCI, and heathy control (HC) based on their MoCA-B score. Acoustic features (Pitches, Jitter, Shimmer, MFCCs, Formants) and linguistic features (part-of-speech, type-token ratio, information words, information units) are extracted. The machine algorithms used in this study included logistic regression, random forest (RF), support vector machines (SVM), Gaussian Naive Bayesian (GNB), and k-Nearest neighbor (kNN). The validation accuracies of the same ML model using acoustic features, linguistic features, and their combination were compared.The accuracy with linguistic features is generally higher than acoustic features in training. The highest accuracy to differentiate HC and AD is 80.77% achieved by SVM, based on all the features extracted from the speech data, while the highest accuracy to differentiate HC and AD or MCI is 80.43% achieved by RF, based only on linguistic features.Our results suggest the utility and validity of linguistic features in the automated diagnosis of cognitive impairment, and validated the applicability of automated diagnosis for Chinese language data.","PeriodicalId":510753,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Public Health","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Automatic speech analysis for detecting cognitive decline of older adults\",\"authors\":\"Lihe Huang, Hao Yang, Yiran Che, Jingjing Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fpubh.2024.1417966\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Speech analysis has been expected to help as a screening tool for early detection of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and mild-cognitively impairment (MCI). Acoustic features and linguistic features are usually used in speech analysis. However, no studies have yet determined which type of features provides better screening effectiveness, especially in the large aging population of China.Firstly, to compare the screening effectiveness of acoustic features, linguistic features, and their combination using the same dataset. Secondly, to develop Chinese automated diagnosis model using self-collected natural discourse data obtained from native Chinese speakers.A total of 92 participants from communities in Shanghai, completed MoCA-B and a picture description task based on the Cookie Theft under the guidance of trained operators, and were divided into three groups including AD, MCI, and heathy control (HC) based on their MoCA-B score. Acoustic features (Pitches, Jitter, Shimmer, MFCCs, Formants) and linguistic features (part-of-speech, type-token ratio, information words, information units) are extracted. The machine algorithms used in this study included logistic regression, random forest (RF), support vector machines (SVM), Gaussian Naive Bayesian (GNB), and k-Nearest neighbor (kNN). The validation accuracies of the same ML model using acoustic features, linguistic features, and their combination were compared.The accuracy with linguistic features is generally higher than acoustic features in training. The highest accuracy to differentiate HC and AD is 80.77% achieved by SVM, based on all the features extracted from the speech data, while the highest accuracy to differentiate HC and AD or MCI is 80.43% achieved by RF, based only on linguistic features.Our results suggest the utility and validity of linguistic features in the automated diagnosis of cognitive impairment, and validated the applicability of automated diagnosis for Chinese language data.\",\"PeriodicalId\":510753,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Public Health\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1417966\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1417966","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

语音分析有望成为早期检测阿尔茨海默病(AD)和轻度认知障碍(MCI)的筛查工具。语音分析通常使用声学特征和语言特征。首先,使用相同的数据集比较声学特征、语言特征及其组合的筛查效果。在经过培训的操作员的指导下,92 名来自上海社区的参与者完成了 MoCA-B 和基于 Cookieft 的图片描述任务,并根据 MoCA-B 得分被分为三组,包括 AD、MCI 和健康对照组(HC)。提取声学特征(音调、抖动、微光、MFCCs、形音)和语言特征(语音部分、类型-标记比、信息词、信息单元)。本研究中使用的机器算法包括逻辑回归、随机森林(RF)、支持向量机(SVM)、高斯直觉贝叶斯(GNB)和 k-近邻(kNN)。比较了使用声学特征、语言特征和它们的组合对同一 ML 模型的验证准确度。基于从语音数据中提取的所有特征,SVM 区分 HC 和 AD 的最高准确率为 80.77%,而仅基于语言特征的 RF 区分 HC 和 AD 或 MCI 的最高准确率为 80.43%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Automatic speech analysis for detecting cognitive decline of older adults
Speech analysis has been expected to help as a screening tool for early detection of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and mild-cognitively impairment (MCI). Acoustic features and linguistic features are usually used in speech analysis. However, no studies have yet determined which type of features provides better screening effectiveness, especially in the large aging population of China.Firstly, to compare the screening effectiveness of acoustic features, linguistic features, and their combination using the same dataset. Secondly, to develop Chinese automated diagnosis model using self-collected natural discourse data obtained from native Chinese speakers.A total of 92 participants from communities in Shanghai, completed MoCA-B and a picture description task based on the Cookie Theft under the guidance of trained operators, and were divided into three groups including AD, MCI, and heathy control (HC) based on their MoCA-B score. Acoustic features (Pitches, Jitter, Shimmer, MFCCs, Formants) and linguistic features (part-of-speech, type-token ratio, information words, information units) are extracted. The machine algorithms used in this study included logistic regression, random forest (RF), support vector machines (SVM), Gaussian Naive Bayesian (GNB), and k-Nearest neighbor (kNN). The validation accuracies of the same ML model using acoustic features, linguistic features, and their combination were compared.The accuracy with linguistic features is generally higher than acoustic features in training. The highest accuracy to differentiate HC and AD is 80.77% achieved by SVM, based on all the features extracted from the speech data, while the highest accuracy to differentiate HC and AD or MCI is 80.43% achieved by RF, based only on linguistic features.Our results suggest the utility and validity of linguistic features in the automated diagnosis of cognitive impairment, and validated the applicability of automated diagnosis for Chinese language data.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信