超声波设置对肺垂直伪影的影响:对机械通气患者的观察研究

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
J. Leote, Andreia Gonçalves, Júlia Fonseca, Ricardo Loução, Hermínia Dias, Maria Inês Ribeiro, Ricardo Meireles, Rita Varudo, Jacobo Bacariza, Filipe Gonzalez
{"title":"超声波设置对肺垂直伪影的影响:对机械通气患者的观察研究","authors":"J. Leote, Andreia Gonçalves, Júlia Fonseca, Ricardo Loução, Hermínia Dias, Maria Inês Ribeiro, Ricardo Meireles, Rita Varudo, Jacobo Bacariza, Filipe Gonzalez","doi":"10.1183/23120541.00483-2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The number of vertical artifacts (VA) in lung ultrasound (LUS) impacts patients’ clinical management. This study aimed to demonstrate the influence of ultrasound settings on the number of VA in patients under invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV).Patients under IMV were recruited for LUS including three breathing cycles with a motionless curvilinear probe on the thoracic region with the most VA. Three experts in LUS were randomly inquired about the number of VA [RL1] and blindly after altering settings for a total of 20 test recordings per patient. The correlation between expert classifications was tested after grading the classifications. The number of VA across clinicians was compared between baseline recordings and test conditions recordings to determine statistical differences.Twenty-nine patients were enrolled with a median SOFA score of 6 (and an interquartile range (median±IQR) of 3. IMV was mainly due to stroke (n=10) and pneumonia (n=6). LUS was made between days 1 and 6 (IQR). Baseline recordings showed a median VA number of 2±2 in inspiration and a median of 1±2 in expiration from a total of 3636 expert classifications with a strong agreement within patients. The probe frequency of 8MHz, artifact filtering, speckle reduction and frame average reduced the median VA number by one. The power of −20dB and dynamic range of 32dB abolished the VA. Gain above 90% increased the median number of VA by one.In thisin vivostudy, the LUS settings influenced the VA number in IMV patients, after controlling for physiological and operator confounders.","PeriodicalId":11739,"journal":{"name":"ERJ Open Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of ultrasound settings on lung vertical artifacts: an observational study in mechanically ventilated patients\",\"authors\":\"J. Leote, Andreia Gonçalves, Júlia Fonseca, Ricardo Loução, Hermínia Dias, Maria Inês Ribeiro, Ricardo Meireles, Rita Varudo, Jacobo Bacariza, Filipe Gonzalez\",\"doi\":\"10.1183/23120541.00483-2024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The number of vertical artifacts (VA) in lung ultrasound (LUS) impacts patients’ clinical management. This study aimed to demonstrate the influence of ultrasound settings on the number of VA in patients under invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV).Patients under IMV were recruited for LUS including three breathing cycles with a motionless curvilinear probe on the thoracic region with the most VA. Three experts in LUS were randomly inquired about the number of VA [RL1] and blindly after altering settings for a total of 20 test recordings per patient. The correlation between expert classifications was tested after grading the classifications. The number of VA across clinicians was compared between baseline recordings and test conditions recordings to determine statistical differences.Twenty-nine patients were enrolled with a median SOFA score of 6 (and an interquartile range (median±IQR) of 3. IMV was mainly due to stroke (n=10) and pneumonia (n=6). LUS was made between days 1 and 6 (IQR). Baseline recordings showed a median VA number of 2±2 in inspiration and a median of 1±2 in expiration from a total of 3636 expert classifications with a strong agreement within patients. The probe frequency of 8MHz, artifact filtering, speckle reduction and frame average reduced the median VA number by one. The power of −20dB and dynamic range of 32dB abolished the VA. Gain above 90% increased the median number of VA by one.In thisin vivostudy, the LUS settings influenced the VA number in IMV patients, after controlling for physiological and operator confounders.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11739,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERJ Open Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERJ Open Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00483-2024\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERJ Open Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00483-2024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肺部超声检查(LUS)中垂直伪影(VA)的数量会影响患者的临床治疗。这项研究旨在证明超声波设置对接受有创机械通气(IMV)患者的 VA 数量的影响。招募接受 IMV 的患者进行 LUS,包括在 VA 最多的胸腔区域使用静止曲线探头进行三个呼吸周期的检查。三位 LUS 专家随机询问 VA [RL1]的数量,并在改变设置后进行盲测,每位患者共进行 20 次测试记录。分级后测试专家分类之间的相关性。29 名患者的 SOFA 中位数为 6(中位数±IQR),四分位数范围为 3。IMV 主要由中风(10 人)和肺炎(6 人)引起。LUS在第1天至第6天之间进行(IQR)。基线记录显示,在总共 3636 次专家分类中,吸气时的 VA 数量中位数为 2±2,呼气时的 VA 数量中位数为 1±2,患者之间的一致性很高。探头频率为 8MHz、滤除伪影、减少斑点和帧平均后,VA 中位数减少了 1。-20dB的功率和32dB的动态范围则消除了VA。在这项活体研究中,在控制了生理和操作混杂因素后,LUS的设置影响了IMV患者的VA数量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of ultrasound settings on lung vertical artifacts: an observational study in mechanically ventilated patients
The number of vertical artifacts (VA) in lung ultrasound (LUS) impacts patients’ clinical management. This study aimed to demonstrate the influence of ultrasound settings on the number of VA in patients under invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV).Patients under IMV were recruited for LUS including three breathing cycles with a motionless curvilinear probe on the thoracic region with the most VA. Three experts in LUS were randomly inquired about the number of VA [RL1] and blindly after altering settings for a total of 20 test recordings per patient. The correlation between expert classifications was tested after grading the classifications. The number of VA across clinicians was compared between baseline recordings and test conditions recordings to determine statistical differences.Twenty-nine patients were enrolled with a median SOFA score of 6 (and an interquartile range (median±IQR) of 3. IMV was mainly due to stroke (n=10) and pneumonia (n=6). LUS was made between days 1 and 6 (IQR). Baseline recordings showed a median VA number of 2±2 in inspiration and a median of 1±2 in expiration from a total of 3636 expert classifications with a strong agreement within patients. The probe frequency of 8MHz, artifact filtering, speckle reduction and frame average reduced the median VA number by one. The power of −20dB and dynamic range of 32dB abolished the VA. Gain above 90% increased the median number of VA by one.In thisin vivostudy, the LUS settings influenced the VA number in IMV patients, after controlling for physiological and operator confounders.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ERJ Open Research
ERJ Open Research Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
273
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: ERJ Open Research is a fully open access original research journal, published online by the European Respiratory Society. The journal aims to publish high-quality work in all fields of respiratory science and medicine, covering basic science, clinical translational science and clinical medicine. The journal was created to help fulfil the ERS objective to disseminate scientific and educational material to its members and to the medical community, but also to provide researchers with an affordable open access specialty journal in which to publish their work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信