{"title":"搭配","authors":"Christian Mair","doi":"10.1075/jhp.00073.mai","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Surveying a representative sample of studies of colloquialisation, a tendency for written norms to move closer to\n spoken usage, the chapter explores:\n \n \n \n the relationship between colloquialisation, operationalised in exclusively linguistic terms, and\n informalisation and democratisation, two processes primarily targeting wider sociocultural change, and\n \n \n complications arising when colloquialisation is extended beyond its original domain of application,\n standard written English of the ENL type.\n \n \n \n There are two major findings. Colloquialisation works less well in the study of ESL varieties than ENL ones. In\n addition, recent real-time analyses of change in spoken English suggest that the supposedly homogeneous baseline style of informal\n conversational English is more internally variable than is assumed in current work on colloquialisation.","PeriodicalId":54081,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Historical Pragmatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Colloquialisation\",\"authors\":\"Christian Mair\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/jhp.00073.mai\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Surveying a representative sample of studies of colloquialisation, a tendency for written norms to move closer to\\n spoken usage, the chapter explores:\\n \\n \\n \\n the relationship between colloquialisation, operationalised in exclusively linguistic terms, and\\n informalisation and democratisation, two processes primarily targeting wider sociocultural change, and\\n \\n \\n complications arising when colloquialisation is extended beyond its original domain of application,\\n standard written English of the ENL type.\\n \\n \\n \\n There are two major findings. Colloquialisation works less well in the study of ESL varieties than ENL ones. In\\n addition, recent real-time analyses of change in spoken English suggest that the supposedly homogeneous baseline style of informal\\n conversational English is more internally variable than is assumed in current work on colloquialisation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54081,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Historical Pragmatics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Historical Pragmatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.00073.mai\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Historical Pragmatics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.00073.mai","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Surveying a representative sample of studies of colloquialisation, a tendency for written norms to move closer to
spoken usage, the chapter explores:
the relationship between colloquialisation, operationalised in exclusively linguistic terms, and
informalisation and democratisation, two processes primarily targeting wider sociocultural change, and
complications arising when colloquialisation is extended beyond its original domain of application,
standard written English of the ENL type.
There are two major findings. Colloquialisation works less well in the study of ESL varieties than ENL ones. In
addition, recent real-time analyses of change in spoken English suggest that the supposedly homogeneous baseline style of informal
conversational English is more internally variable than is assumed in current work on colloquialisation.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Historical Pragmatics provides an interdisciplinary forum for theoretical, empirical and methodological work at the intersection of pragmatics and historical linguistics. The editorial focus is on socio-historical and pragmatic aspects of historical texts in their sociocultural context of communication (e.g. conversational principles, politeness strategies, or speech acts) and on diachronic pragmatics as seen in linguistic processes such as grammaticalization or discoursization. Contributions draw on data from literary or non-literary sources and from any language. In addition to contributions with a strictly pragmatic or discourse analytical perspective, it also includes contributions with a more sociolinguistic or semantic approach.