搭配

IF 0.4 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Christian Mair
{"title":"搭配","authors":"Christian Mair","doi":"10.1075/jhp.00073.mai","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Surveying a representative sample of studies of colloquialisation, a tendency for written norms to move closer to\n spoken usage, the chapter explores:\n \n \n \n the relationship between colloquialisation, operationalised in exclusively linguistic terms, and\n informalisation and democratisation, two processes primarily targeting wider sociocultural change, and\n \n \n complications arising when colloquialisation is extended beyond its original domain of application,\n standard written English of the ENL type.\n \n \n \n There are two major findings. Colloquialisation works less well in the study of ESL varieties than ENL ones. In\n addition, recent real-time analyses of change in spoken English suggest that the supposedly homogeneous baseline style of informal\n conversational English is more internally variable than is assumed in current work on colloquialisation.","PeriodicalId":54081,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Historical Pragmatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Colloquialisation\",\"authors\":\"Christian Mair\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/jhp.00073.mai\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Surveying a representative sample of studies of colloquialisation, a tendency for written norms to move closer to\\n spoken usage, the chapter explores:\\n \\n \\n \\n the relationship between colloquialisation, operationalised in exclusively linguistic terms, and\\n informalisation and democratisation, two processes primarily targeting wider sociocultural change, and\\n \\n \\n complications arising when colloquialisation is extended beyond its original domain of application,\\n standard written English of the ENL type.\\n \\n \\n \\n There are two major findings. Colloquialisation works less well in the study of ESL varieties than ENL ones. In\\n addition, recent real-time analyses of change in spoken English suggest that the supposedly homogeneous baseline style of informal\\n conversational English is more internally variable than is assumed in current work on colloquialisation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54081,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Historical Pragmatics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Historical Pragmatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.00073.mai\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Historical Pragmatics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.00073.mai","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

口语化是书面规范向口语用法靠拢的一种趋势,本章对口语化研究的代表性样本进行了调查,探讨了:口语化(完全从语言学角度进行操作)与非正式化和民主化(主要针对更广泛的社会文化变革的两个过程)之间的关系,以及当口语化扩展到其最初的应用领域(ENL 类型的标准书面英语)之外时产生的复杂情况。 有两个主要发现。口语化在研究 ESL 变体方面的效果不如 ENL 变体。此外,最近对英语口语变化的实时分析表明,非正式会话英语的所谓同质基线风格比当前口语化研究中假设的具有更多的内部可变性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Colloquialisation
Surveying a representative sample of studies of colloquialisation, a tendency for written norms to move closer to spoken usage, the chapter explores: the relationship between colloquialisation, operationalised in exclusively linguistic terms, and informalisation and democratisation, two processes primarily targeting wider sociocultural change, and complications arising when colloquialisation is extended beyond its original domain of application, standard written English of the ENL type. There are two major findings. Colloquialisation works less well in the study of ESL varieties than ENL ones. In addition, recent real-time analyses of change in spoken English suggest that the supposedly homogeneous baseline style of informal conversational English is more internally variable than is assumed in current work on colloquialisation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: The Journal of Historical Pragmatics provides an interdisciplinary forum for theoretical, empirical and methodological work at the intersection of pragmatics and historical linguistics. The editorial focus is on socio-historical and pragmatic aspects of historical texts in their sociocultural context of communication (e.g. conversational principles, politeness strategies, or speech acts) and on diachronic pragmatics as seen in linguistic processes such as grammaticalization or discoursization. Contributions draw on data from literary or non-literary sources and from any language. In addition to contributions with a strictly pragmatic or discourse analytical perspective, it also includes contributions with a more sociolinguistic or semantic approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信