加强撒哈拉以南非洲地区的外科医疗保健研究能力:尼日利亚研究培训计划的影响

E. A. Ameh, J. Seyi-Olajide, Nkeiruka Ameh, Afieharo Michael, Mohammed AS Abdullahi, Oti N. Aria, Nkeiruka Obi, Isaac Chukwu
{"title":"加强撒哈拉以南非洲地区的外科医疗保健研究能力:尼日利亚研究培训计划的影响","authors":"E. A. Ameh, J. Seyi-Olajide, Nkeiruka Ameh, Afieharo Michael, Mohammed AS Abdullahi, Oti N. Aria, Nkeiruka Obi, Isaac Chukwu","doi":"10.3389/fmed.2024.1429168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Limited research capacity has contributed to the lack of high-quality research from low-and middle-income countries. This is compounded by limited research training opportunities. Research capacity scale-up training was deployed as part of the implementation of the National Surgical, Obstetrics, Anaesthesia, and Nursing Plan for Nigeria. We report the impact of this locally contextualized efforts to scale up research capacity in sub-Saharan Africa.This is an evaluation of the training of 65 participants in research, grant writing and manuscript writing and publication. Pre- and post-training surveys using a 5-point Likert scale and open-ended questions were administered to evaluate the impact of the programme.There were 39 (60%) males and 26 (40%) females aged 26–62 years (median 42 years). Thirty-nine (60%) participants had previous training in research, but only 12 (18.5%) had previously received grant writing training, and 17 (26.2%) had previously received manuscript writing and publishing training. Following training, 45 (70.3%) participants agreed that the training was relevant. The research, grant writing and manuscript writing, and publication components of the training were rated high by the participants (45–59, 70.3–92.2%). However, 41.2% felt that there was not enough time, and 32.4% felt that the training was too comprehensive. Nearly all the participants agreed that the training had improved their skills in research, grant writing and manuscript writing and publication, and more than two-thirds subsequently engaged in informal mentoring of others. Overall, participants achieved success in designing their own research projects and publishing manuscripts and grants. Three (4.6%) of the participants had gone on to become faculty for the research training programme. The three top barriers encountered following training were time constraints (67.3%), lack of funding (36.5%) and not being able to find research collaborators (25%).Outcome of this training programme is encouraging and highlights the feasibility and potential impact of deploying such programmes in low and middle income countries (LMICs). Despite the positive outcomes, barriers including time constraints, funding limitations, and difficulties in finding research collaborators remain to be addressed. Such training programmes need to be supported to strengthen the research capacity in this and similar settings.","PeriodicalId":502302,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Medicine","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strengthening surgical healthcare research capacity in sub-Saharan Africa: impact of a research training programme in Nigeria\",\"authors\":\"E. A. Ameh, J. Seyi-Olajide, Nkeiruka Ameh, Afieharo Michael, Mohammed AS Abdullahi, Oti N. Aria, Nkeiruka Obi, Isaac Chukwu\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fmed.2024.1429168\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Limited research capacity has contributed to the lack of high-quality research from low-and middle-income countries. This is compounded by limited research training opportunities. Research capacity scale-up training was deployed as part of the implementation of the National Surgical, Obstetrics, Anaesthesia, and Nursing Plan for Nigeria. We report the impact of this locally contextualized efforts to scale up research capacity in sub-Saharan Africa.This is an evaluation of the training of 65 participants in research, grant writing and manuscript writing and publication. Pre- and post-training surveys using a 5-point Likert scale and open-ended questions were administered to evaluate the impact of the programme.There were 39 (60%) males and 26 (40%) females aged 26–62 years (median 42 years). Thirty-nine (60%) participants had previous training in research, but only 12 (18.5%) had previously received grant writing training, and 17 (26.2%) had previously received manuscript writing and publishing training. Following training, 45 (70.3%) participants agreed that the training was relevant. The research, grant writing and manuscript writing, and publication components of the training were rated high by the participants (45–59, 70.3–92.2%). However, 41.2% felt that there was not enough time, and 32.4% felt that the training was too comprehensive. Nearly all the participants agreed that the training had improved their skills in research, grant writing and manuscript writing and publication, and more than two-thirds subsequently engaged in informal mentoring of others. Overall, participants achieved success in designing their own research projects and publishing manuscripts and grants. Three (4.6%) of the participants had gone on to become faculty for the research training programme. The three top barriers encountered following training were time constraints (67.3%), lack of funding (36.5%) and not being able to find research collaborators (25%).Outcome of this training programme is encouraging and highlights the feasibility and potential impact of deploying such programmes in low and middle income countries (LMICs). Despite the positive outcomes, barriers including time constraints, funding limitations, and difficulties in finding research collaborators remain to be addressed. Such training programmes need to be supported to strengthen the research capacity in this and similar settings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":502302,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Medicine\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1429168\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1429168","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究能力有限导致中低收入国家缺乏高质量的研究。而研究培训机会有限则加剧了这一问题。作为尼日利亚国家外科、产科、麻醉和护理计划实施工作的一部分,开展了科研能力提升培训。我们报告了这一因地制宜的努力对撒哈拉以南非洲地区科研能力提升的影响。这是对 65 名参加者在科研、基金撰写、手稿撰写和出版方面的培训情况进行的评估。培训前和培训后的调查使用了 5 分李克特量表和开放式问题,以评估该计划的影响。参加者中有 39 名男性(60%)和 26 名女性(40%),年龄在 26-62 岁之间(中位数为 42 岁)。39名参与者(60%)曾接受过研究培训,但只有12名(18.5%)曾接受过撰写研究基金的培训,17名(26.2%)曾接受过撰写和出版手稿的培训。培训结束后,45 名学员(70.3%)认为培训很有意义。学员们对培训中的研究、资助金撰写、稿件撰写和出版部分给予了较高的评价(45-59 人,70.3-92.2%)。但是,41.2% 的学员认为培训时间不够,32.4% 的学员认为培训内容过于全面。几乎所有学员都认为,培训提高了他们在研究、基金撰写、稿件撰写和出版方面的技能,三分之二以上的学员随后参与了对他人的非正式指导。总体而言,学员们在设计自己的研究项目、发表手稿和获得资助方面取得了成功。三位学员(4.6%)成为研究培训计划的教师。培训后遇到的三大障碍是时间限制(67.3%)、缺乏资金(36.5%)和找不到研究合作者(25%)。尽管取得了积极成果,但包括时间限制、资金限制和难以找到研究合作者在内的障碍仍有待解决。此类培训计划需要得到支持,以加强该地区及类似地区的研究能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Strengthening surgical healthcare research capacity in sub-Saharan Africa: impact of a research training programme in Nigeria
Limited research capacity has contributed to the lack of high-quality research from low-and middle-income countries. This is compounded by limited research training opportunities. Research capacity scale-up training was deployed as part of the implementation of the National Surgical, Obstetrics, Anaesthesia, and Nursing Plan for Nigeria. We report the impact of this locally contextualized efforts to scale up research capacity in sub-Saharan Africa.This is an evaluation of the training of 65 participants in research, grant writing and manuscript writing and publication. Pre- and post-training surveys using a 5-point Likert scale and open-ended questions were administered to evaluate the impact of the programme.There were 39 (60%) males and 26 (40%) females aged 26–62 years (median 42 years). Thirty-nine (60%) participants had previous training in research, but only 12 (18.5%) had previously received grant writing training, and 17 (26.2%) had previously received manuscript writing and publishing training. Following training, 45 (70.3%) participants agreed that the training was relevant. The research, grant writing and manuscript writing, and publication components of the training were rated high by the participants (45–59, 70.3–92.2%). However, 41.2% felt that there was not enough time, and 32.4% felt that the training was too comprehensive. Nearly all the participants agreed that the training had improved their skills in research, grant writing and manuscript writing and publication, and more than two-thirds subsequently engaged in informal mentoring of others. Overall, participants achieved success in designing their own research projects and publishing manuscripts and grants. Three (4.6%) of the participants had gone on to become faculty for the research training programme. The three top barriers encountered following training were time constraints (67.3%), lack of funding (36.5%) and not being able to find research collaborators (25%).Outcome of this training programme is encouraging and highlights the feasibility and potential impact of deploying such programmes in low and middle income countries (LMICs). Despite the positive outcomes, barriers including time constraints, funding limitations, and difficulties in finding research collaborators remain to be addressed. Such training programmes need to be supported to strengthen the research capacity in this and similar settings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信